Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rightsideout

(978 posts)
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 09:35 AM Feb 2013

I'm now calling the Second Amendment the Genocide Amendment

1,340,000 gun deaths since 1968 certainly qualifies it. The Genocide Amendment has worked quite well since it's being carried out at the hands of it's own populace.

Let the flames begin!

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm now calling the Second Amendment the Genocide Amendment (Original Post) rightsideout Feb 2013 OP
Wow.. pipoman Feb 2013 #1
I don't think the US would be all that different without guns, other than SWTORFanatic Feb 2013 #5
Just another 'hair on fire' pipoman Feb 2013 #8
This just in case meme is nonsense. Hey, what if you run into a BG with a SWTORFanatic Feb 2013 #9
So is there a violence problem or isn't there? pipoman Feb 2013 #14
There is a violence problem with both gang bangers and loose cannons (aka gun nuts) with SWTORFanatic Feb 2013 #15
I'd like the source of the 300 number pipoman Feb 2013 #24
Here's the source SWTORFanatic Feb 2013 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author SWTORFanatic Feb 2013 #29
What should I do when I'm at the farm and coyotes go after the goats Recursion Feb 2013 #16
Long guns are less of a problem. Those are very rarely open or concealed (lol?) carried in SWTORFanatic Feb 2013 #18
Too bad they are all anybody is trying to ban Recursion Feb 2013 #21
Never heard of a strong movement to ban long guns other than things like SWTORFanatic Feb 2013 #22
I bet the OP drives guardian Feb 2013 #23
Nope rightsideout Feb 2013 #30
Nothing like a calm well-reasoned argument. el_bryanto Feb 2013 #2
So trivializing genocide is your solution? hack89 Feb 2013 #3
I have no idea why gun owners are worried Recursion Feb 2013 #4
Do you call the 5th the Criminal Protection Amendment? aikoaiko Feb 2013 #6
You might want to rethink that... RevStPatrick Feb 2013 #7
Nice user name. randome Feb 2013 #10
Idiot. nt greytdemocrat Feb 2013 #11
Words... mean things. Robb Feb 2013 #12
Glad you're not in a position of influence. Eleanors38 Feb 2013 #13
I'm calling cars "genocide enablers" dairydog91 Feb 2013 #17
What the? libtodeath Feb 2013 #19
Not very effective considering a 200+ year run TheKentuckian Feb 2013 #20
I call the big one bitey RZM Feb 2013 #25
It's your right to appear ridiculous cthulu2016 Feb 2013 #26
K&R. Perfect name for it. MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #27
No flames from me... I'm calling swimming pools "Genocide Puddles". n/t cherokeeprogressive Feb 2013 #31
LOL rightsideout Feb 2013 #32

SWTORFanatic

(385 posts)
5. I don't think the US would be all that different without guns, other than
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 09:54 AM
Feb 2013

less people getting killed. You can survive without a gun. I have for 32 years never once had the need to use one.

On the other hand, things would be very different (and for the worse) without cars.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
8. Just another 'hair on fire'
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:01 AM
Feb 2013

ridiculous gun post on GD.

Oh, and I actually have a fire extinguisher in my kitchen..have kept one in there for over 20 years...never have had the need to use it...I think I'll keep one around, just in case..

SWTORFanatic

(385 posts)
9. This just in case meme is nonsense. Hey, what if you run into a BG with a
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:04 AM
Feb 2013

gun and he's a better shot and faster than you?

Why aren't you wearing body armor right now? Never know when a BG with a gun who is a better shot and faster than you might show up!

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
14. So is there a violence problem or isn't there?
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:32 AM
Feb 2013

If there is, seems reasonable to have some idea how one would respond if confronted with it. If there isn't, why does it matter what I have or don't have? Further, using your logic, if one has a fire extinguisher, they should wear a fire suit all the time...just more nonsense it is..

The actual meme is something to the effect, 'you stand more of a chance of a bad guy killing you with your own gun than defending yourself'..and such silliness..

SWTORFanatic

(385 posts)
15. There is a violence problem with both gang bangers and loose cannons (aka gun nuts) with
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:41 AM
Feb 2013

guns.

BUT the number of people who kill an attacker in a justified homicide is less than 300 PER YEAR. The chance that it happens to you is so unlikely to be nearly as statistically insignificant as winning the lottery. Honestly, there are other things you are probably not doing with your life that would protect you accidental / intentional injury or death much more than having a gun would.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
24. I'd like the source of the 300 number
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 09:43 PM
Feb 2013

and how many times people defend themselves without firing a shot. The chances of being the victim of violent crime far exceeds the chance of a house fire, tornado, hurricane, and other things you would find perfectly reasonable to consider an emergency response for...how is victimization any different?

Response to pipoman (Reply #24)

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
16. What should I do when I'm at the farm and coyotes go after the goats
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:42 AM
Feb 2013

Or a marten goes after the pullets? Or when a cottonmouth is between me and the river?

SWTORFanatic

(385 posts)
22. Never heard of a strong movement to ban long guns other than things like
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:51 AM
Feb 2013

AR15s. Most people who have a problem with guns have a problem with those types AND/OR handguns. And also oversized (no one needs) rifle rounds like .50 caliber rifles.

Very few have a problem with your standard 12 gauge / 20 gauge / 30-.06.

rightsideout

(978 posts)
30. Nope
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 11:28 PM
Feb 2013

I drive an electric powered Ford Escort I converted to run on electricity several years ago. 80,000 electric miles. Not many people know how to convert a car to run on electricity. So that's my ride.

Apparently, 1,340,000 deaths since 1968 as the result of delusional Amendment doesn't seem to bother anyone.

The Amendment has outlasted it's usefulness and has probably caused more deaths than it's protected.

You know. Like sending 4000 Americans to die in Iraq in revenge for 3000 that died in 9/11.

I'm not advocating taking people's guns. If you'll want to kill each other over it, be my guest. I just hope I'm not caught in the cross fire or become a victim like my best friend did at the hand's of his father's gun which was supposed to be used for protection. So add him as one of the 1,340,000 Second Amendment victims.

So yea, you all can stick your head in the sand that an Amendment is killing it's own people.

As far as comparing car fatalities to gun fatalities. Now, that's delusional. Get real. They don't even serve the same purpose.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
2. Nothing like a calm well-reasoned argument.
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 09:40 AM
Feb 2013

That might not have been clear. I mean this post is nothing like a calm well-reasoned argument.

Bryant

hack89

(39,171 posts)
3. So trivializing genocide is your solution?
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 09:40 AM
Feb 2013

ok.
Are cigarettes genocide sticks? Is alcohol genocide liquid?

Robb

(39,665 posts)
12. Words... mean things.
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:12 AM
Feb 2013

Genocide usually has intent, deliberation, and -- to be frank -- focus.

Three things I do not associate with the current wholesale slaughter, numbers notwithstanding.

dairydog91

(951 posts)
17. I'm calling cars "genocide enablers"
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:44 AM
Feb 2013

World Health Organization estimates that, worldwide, well over a million people die in car accidents every year.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
20. Not very effective considering a 200+ year run
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:45 AM
Feb 2013

Amazingly, the populations has increased a staggering amount over such time despite "genocide" being a fundamental part of the fabric.

Imagine how HUGH our population would be without hundreds of years of "genocide"!

I was also wondering what population was targeted, I assumed you meant all Americans (which means it isn't working to well).

Who is doing the targeting and what is their endgame?

Based on the rate of death, when will we anticipate being wiped out?

rightsideout

(978 posts)
32. LOL
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 11:55 PM
Feb 2013

Glad I caused a stir. Sometimes you have to be extreme to get attention.

When it comes to people loosing their lives over an antiquated amendment then so be it. Lets face it. Our founding fathers wrote that Amendment and people are dying exercising their right over.

I would say over 1 million deaths and probably millions of injuries qualifies as a US government policy that's killing it's own people.

But I can see that people here are blinded by their own patriotism over their precious amendments.

And if someone wants to kick me out of here please do. I've tried signing out for good and can't find a way out.

And no, I'm not a Republican. "Rightsideout" is a play on words. I voted for Clinton twice, voted for Gore and Kerry and Obama twice. I'm an environmentalist and liberal that lives in a solar powered house and drives an electric car. I currently have one of my electric cars on display at the DC auto show.

I hate guns with a passion since my best friend was killed by his father's gun that was supposed to be used for protection. All because his dad insisted on practicing his Second Amendment rights.

So kick my ass outta here!!









Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm now calling the Secon...