General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat you "young turds" are missing about halftime show
Sure, some people were not happy with the outfits. Some said they didn't like Beyonce's music. For our differences in taste, we've been pilloried on DU, with lots of jokes about The Andrew Sisters and Lawrence Welk.
My problem with show was, well, the show. The young turds keep saying what a great singer/performer Beyonce is. But I saw 20-30 other women on that stage dancing the exact same steps as Beyonce, against a million-dollar backdrop of lighting, video displays and pyrotechnics. Beyonce wasn't even singing (or lip syncing) for much of the time, she was just shaking her half-naked body while stuff blew up, and lights flashed in a display which probably sent a few epileptics into shock.
The point is, in this era of manufactured boy bands and Disney Channel dolls, the young turds seem to not realize what it means to be a "band" or even a singer. What was amazing (and sickening, if you really think about the expense of this brief extravaganza in a stadium full of people who paid $3,400 to watch a game, but complain about a tiny tax increase), was just the spectacle. Dozens of pretty women dancing about on an electrified video game set, and people are saying "she's an awesome singer!"
Meh. I've seen a hundred strippers do the same moves. Beyonce didn't write the music, didn't build the stage, didn't fire off the rockets, hell, she can't even play an instrument. She was a prop in someone else's stage show.
BTW, I'm an "old turd" who prefers college radio, alt rock (whatever that is) and most anything played by actual musicians. I just can't stand packaged sugar pops. That's just the way my taste runs.
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)And you are correct, Beyonce didn't do much singing. Repeated grunts and words.
I thought the half time show as a dud at best. I kept waiting for something exciting to happen and all I got was more lights and pyrotechnics. WOW!
brush
(53,794 posts)Thought it was a great, high energy "show", which is what it was meant to be. Much better than Madonna's geriatric version last year. When the other two Destiny's Child members came out, that was a highlight. Who can complain about two more gorgeous women, best Superbowl half time show ever. And I'm not the only one blown away by it. Here's a link with twitter feeds from others, several celebrities included, and most of them are women.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/03/halftime-show-reactions-beyonce-destinys-child-tweets_n_2612490.html?ref=topbar#slide=2057176
mac56
(17,572 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)When the back part of the stage flipped up as a video screen, I wondered if the people on the then-obstructed part of the stadium paid a lower price.
It was produced as a stage event meant to be viewed from the front.
Stadiums are round. The producers are no doubt capable of putting together something meant to be seen from one direction, but it was a front-view event that used a small portion of the field, and didn't seem to be a "made for viewing in a stadium" event.
Response to jberryhill (Reply #108)
bvar22 This message was self-deleted by its author.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Better than The Stones?
Better than The Boss?
No pre-packaged commercial TV "extravaganza" featuring a half-dressed TV Spokesmodel "performing" a script written, packaged, and approved by a team of Commercial Corporate TV writers targeting an audience of dedicated American Idol TV Watchers will ever be better than a REAL band with REAL Singers performing REAL Music that comes from their heart and their sweat.
independentpiney
(1,510 posts)I've always thought most of Beyonces solo music sounded like something from a half time show, I've never liked it. But at least she's still somewhat in the prime of her career, not some bunch of old men who are a shadow of what they used to be in their prime, which only people in their later '50s or older experienced firsthand. They were like having Bing Crosby or the remnants of the Dorsey band play a halftime show in the late '60s. And you can't seriously believe the Who and Stones half time shows weren't any less pre-packaged commercial TV "extravaganza" s than hers was.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)won't we? The Who, The Stones, Pink Floyd, etc. etc. have already stood the test of time. Many young people love their music. Let's see where Beyonce's music is in 40 years.
independentpiney
(1,510 posts)I said in response to another poster that I felt her super bowl performance was better than the Who's, which I thought was a total embarrassment, or the geriatric Stones parody of their younger selves. Nothing at all to do with the quality of the music. Super bowl half time shows are glitzy pop entertainment extravaganzas, which she is very good at. But she could never come even remotely close to Diana Ross' performance. which I think was the best to date.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)vocalists in Los Angeles, all of whom could sing and emote rings around Beyonce (and a couple of whom could even give Sade a run for her money). OK, maybe these women couldn't shake their asses quite as adeptly as Beyonce, but I really don't give a fuck about that. Were Beyonce to try her hand at 'God Bless the Child' or "All of Me," she would suck and suck badly.
Pmc1962
(42 posts)I think she did a beautiful job. I doubt she would suck badly at 'God Bless the Child' or 'All of Me'.
I do not follow her music (not my genre) but I think she's very talented as both a singer and a dancer. All that with a baby at home! (that's the most impressive part.)
If you don't like Beyonce's music, fine, but please don't disparage her like that.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)judged her. I did not see or hear the performance you mention.
NewYorkTaxPayer
(27 posts)of what she does, Alicia Keys on the other hand is unbelievable, but she sang At Last for a movie and did a bunch of public performances of it:
bloom
(11,635 posts)But recently when I actually listened - I think she is pretty darn good.
She is a performer. Most jazz musicians are performers, for that matter - not writing what they play.
Classical musicians are performers. The Super Bowl Haftime show is all about performance.
What she did - was suitable for the event.
tomp
(9,512 posts)I think she is a terrible singer and a mediocre piano player at best. all hype.
Dollface
(1,590 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)...by my standards.
I mean, she has her thing and all that but there are great singers out there.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)She should shut-up and cover up.
brush
(53,794 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 5, 2013, 09:55 AM - Edit history (1)
. . . but there's nothing wrong with those thighs. Get some glasses for God's sake. And you must have meant "cellulite" not "cellulose", right?
ObaMania
(2,054 posts)But it was not so bad that her pair of support hose couldn't keep it together.
brush
(53,794 posts)Pretty hard for cellulite (not "cellulose" to form when your job is to dance/entertain/exercise/practice like she does.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)(born and raised there) but that was something I always LOVED about L.A. You could walk into virtually any club and see the most amazing talent. It could be the smallest, out-of-the-way little dive in a shitty part of town, didn't matter. The competition there is so steep there's no way someone with no talent would ever get stage time.
And PLEASE don't encourage her to try something like "God Bless the Child" or "All of Me." Have you heard what she did to "At Last?" She ought to be gagged for life just for that.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)I love rock but I don't want to see a bunch of senior citizens rolled onto the stage to perform 50 year old songs
bvar22
(39,909 posts)..to grilled salmon and fine wine.
There is no accounting for taste.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)no accounting for taste
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)brush
(53,794 posts)She may not have the greatest voice but she's an "entertainer" with great showmanship. And simply put, she put on a great, entertaining show yesterday, which is what the Superbowl half time show is all about. It's an extravaganza not an intimate club date with subtle phrasings and smooth changes and intonations. She delivered exactly what was called for and she did it way better than most.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)She put on a SHOW!
ObaMania
(2,054 posts).. begins at the 1:00 mark.
Honestly, the audio was bad, the songs were bad, and the Destiny's Child reunion wasn't even with Destiny's Child songs.
Heck, I'd put Aerosmith and Britney Spear's performance of a few years back over this one and that, IMO, was pretty bad.
They should try and cover all bases in these halftime shows. Represented by a little rock, a little country, and a little of whatever you call Beyonce's music.
JI7
(89,254 posts)brush
(53,794 posts). . . when she was younger. Madonna was still trying the deep knee bends from her younger days and very visibly the flexibility just was not there.
RC
(25,592 posts)That should count for something.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)surely win!
RC
(25,592 posts)ChazII
(6,205 posts)effected by lights I made sure all the lights around my television set were turned on and I did leave the room at one point. Strobes are the worst for me.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,239 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)Like many, I tuned in to watch a half hour or so of supposedly amazing commercials, but a good, exciting game broke. That was the first complete game I've watched many, many years.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)And the Cowboys!
dawg
(10,624 posts)Talented performer. Very easy on the eyes.
No complaints from dawg.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)I believe it has to do with an expectation of perfection from producers, sponsors, and the audience. Another explanation may be that people expect their favorite performers to sound the same on stage as on their recordings, which is impossible since the released recordings of most artists are so electronically altered it sounds nothing like the artist who is singing. No, the age of entertainment, true entertainment, has passed in favor of faux entertainment..
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)for lack of talent.
Random example of the opposite here.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Somehow I had forgotten that great Dylan song and was happy to hear such an awesome cover of it. 2 new purchases on iTunes.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)"All Apologies" too. It will blow you away. She takes Cobain to a whole new level and he was already among the exalted, imho.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)Her new offering is as good as her first to me. Great stuff. The Super Bowl has always been one big commercial crap event and I am proud to say I missed it and the literal "blowout" that was the half time show.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)scubadude
(3,556 posts)Here is a better example of about a one octave singer who doesn't play an instrument beyond her voice.
scubadude
(3,556 posts)And look, they are all really playing their instruments, to a level virtually unknown today. Look her up for some incredible vocal talent. She doesn't really light it up in this tune, but I like it!
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)edited to add: It is not a problem unless the person lip syncing is not the one actually singing- That is fraud.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)He never had live performers. Even The Beatles lip synced.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)Thanks for bringing that up - I believe that most songs were lip synced in the 50s and 60s. And it was common knowledge.
I think people forget that the outrage over Milli Vanilli is that they were lip syncing to others voices. Just a lot of poutrage, in my opinion.
(snip)
Milli Vanilli was a pop and dance project created by Frank Farian in Munich, Germany, in 1988. The group was formed with Fab Morvan and Rob Pilatus. The group's debut album Girl You Know It's True achieved international success and earned them a Grammy Award for Best New Artist on February 21, 1990.[1] Milli Vanilli became one of the most popular pop acts in the late 1980s and early 1990s. However, their success turned to infamy when their Grammy was revoked after it was revealed by Chuck Philips of the LA Times that the lead vocals on the record were not the actual voices of Morvan and Pilatus
(snip)
When Frank Farian developed the concept of Milli Vanilli, he chose to feature vocals by Charles Shaw, John Davis, Brad Howell, and twin sisters Jodie and Linda Rocco; however, he felt that those singers lacked a marketable image. He then recruited Robert Pilatus and Fabrice Morvan, two younger model/dancers he found singing in a Munich club for a rehearsal. He noticed that while the original singers lacked a marketable image, Pilatus and Morvan lacked in singing ability.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milli_Vanilli
pscot
(21,024 posts)variety shows like Sullivans used lip synch. People would have been outraged to learn it.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)All my friends knew- i think Dick Clark even spoke of it. So I guess you were in the in-crowd! LOL ( Like I was?)
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)A lot of the Smothers Brothers Hour was live.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)ALL performers who were on that stage performed LIVE. NO lip-synching at ALL.
mac56
(17,572 posts)The Beatles were on Sullivan four times: three in 1964 and once in 1965. I watched each of the original broadcasts and own a DVD of all four.
There is no way in hell that The Beatles lip synced on Sullivan. Lennon flubbed lines, the microphone cut out on him during the first appearance, they played different arrangements than what was "on the record."
Sorry. You will have to show me where you "discovered" that The Beatles lip synced on Sullivan.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)"Light My Fire" instead of the censored version (w/o "girl, we couldn't get much higher" the management requested? Got them banned from the show.
Lip synced? Not so much.
mac56
(17,572 posts)Their current hit was "Let's Spend The Night Together." Sullivan and his people insisted they change it to "Let's Spend Some Time Together." Mick held out till the last minute, then performed it live... SULLIVAN'S way. Not lip synced either.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)<sigh> growing old sucks.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Of course, the BBC wouldn't broadcast the Beatles's "A Day in the Life" because of the "I'd love to turn you on" part.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)Somebody posts that performers on The Ed Sullivan Show lip-sync'd, and all of a sudden it bcomes fact. Sort of like what fox-nonsense does.
It's what we have to be always vigilant about; calling out statements that ARE NOT FACT - but rather are just somebody's "hunch".
Well, glad to hear you were called on it. I agree that there were lots of lip-sycn's back in the 60's and on - but I'd also offer that they were a poor substitute for talent.
I saw the Beach Boys live in Portland, Oregon back in the 60's - and I've NEVER heard such God-awful harmony in my life. It was PATHETIC. I'm still a fan of their music today - but they were awful "live"....just awful!!
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)In the era before ear pieces, singers on stage with a roaring crowd can be horribly off-key. I've heard some Beatles' vocals from live concerts and they were just as bad.
EC
(12,287 posts)Ed Sullivan was live as were many of the variety shows. (The Stones and Jim Morrison went off script on their songs) But Bandstand and the cheaper shows that taped were lip-synced.
Atman
(31,464 posts)You may have heard of a little ditty called "My Boyfriend's Back." My cousins were 2/3 of the trio The Angels, and they performed on Ed Sullivan two or three times. I would guess they lip-synced. Sad thing is, this was the day of Motown and they got paid scale...$500 a piece, no royalties, for one of the most famous songs ever recorded. They eventually sued sometime in the 80's or 90's, but I don't recall what they got for their efforts.
One of them went on to record and write commercial jingles and became quite well-off. The other retired from music completely, until they did a reunion album about five years ago, with a re-mixed version of My Boyfriend's Back, and several original tunes. I don't think it sold very well.
loved that song at the time
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)"My Boyfriend's Back" is a classic of the girl group genre. I know that song well.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)The Doors went "off script" in the sense that the network censors wanted the phrase "girl we couldn't get much higher" changed because of the concern "higher" was a reference to drugs. For whatever reason, Morrison sang the original unchanged lyrics.
I had heard The Doors were banned from future appearances on The Ed Sullivan show because of that.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)to pass the censors.
That wouldn't have been necessary if they had lip-synched.
It's time to put this nonsense about The Ed Sullivan Show to rest.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)It was extremely nerve-wracking to the performers like Jim Morrison who had to get up there and sing live to the entire country.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Sullivan asked that most musical acts perform their music live, rather than lip-synching to their recordings...."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Sullivan
"Television, in its beginning, was mostly a live medium. Ed Sullivan, Milton Berle and Steve Allens Tonight Show all featured live performances by the top recording artists of the day.....The Beatles performed completely live during their appearances, while the Rolling Stones prerecorded their instrumental tracks, with Mick Jagger doing a live vocal."
http://thedaleyplanet.net/articles/archives/541
"The Beatles performed four to six songs on practically every appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show. They performed a grand total of TWENTY songs for Ed Sullivan. And all the performances were LIVE. (Not lip-synch.)"
http://www.thefab40.com/media/news/dvd.html
12AngryBorneoWildmen
(536 posts)Anybody? His show was recalled in the lyrics of The Go-Go's song "Beatnik Beach," which appeared on the 1982 album Vacation: "We'll lipsync a go-go / Like on the Lloyd Thaxton Show, yeah ..."[5]
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)Catherine Vincent
(34,491 posts)But I don't get people complaining about lip synching. If a singer is doing a lot of dance steps, it would be hard to sing moving around so much.
brush
(53,794 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Back in the early days of TV, when we had variety shows like Ed Sullivan, all performers lip synced.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Ed Sullivan performances and believe they were not lipsynced at all..and then again, maybe I am just out of touch on this issue..
Fiendish Thingy
(15,631 posts)In the early days of Tv, lip syncing was the exception, not the rule- shows were broadcast live, and performers sang live. This gradually changed, by the late 60s, syncing was more common,including on Ed Sullivan's show (but the Beatles always performed live- not counting promotional films shown after they stopped touring).
The scandal about lip syncing now is that many performers with active, gyration filled shows, will lip sync in live, public, fee for entrance concerts.
JAbuchan08
(3,046 posts)Particularly high energy dancing.
It's harder to sing when you're winded from jumping and twirling about - that's not to say it can't be done, it's just harder.
AAO
(3,300 posts)sweetloukillbot
(11,033 posts)When Springsteen played the Super Bowl, he had a tape to lip-sync in case anything went wrong. Ditto Tom Petty (who along with Mike Campbell were the only musicians playing live at that Super Bowl), ditto the Rolling Stones, ditto the Who. The producers want the event to be perfect, and if a mic fails they want to still be able to put forth a show - so the singers are ready to lip-sync if necessary.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)Watching "Perry Mason" a show from the 60s.
An agent/producer, "You think it takes talent? What it takes is guts and money!"
He then proceeds to make a kid (Sandy) a marketable product.
appleannie1
(5,067 posts)to promote them. They lip synced on shows on tv too if the ever got famous enough to appear on one.
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)I remember seeing Simon & Garfunkel live. They didn't sound anything like their records. As for lipsyncing, at least at the Inauguration - the voice, like any other instrument, is sensitive to temperature and trying to belt out the National Anthem (a song notoriously difficult to sing) live in 20 degree temperatures, risked having it come out as a series of squaks, sharps, and flats - not to mention the possibility of doing actual damage to her voice.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)he would routinely miss 25-30% of his notes in live performance BEFORE THE ADVENT OF THE PHONOGRAPH RECORD Its invention forced classical pianists like him to aspire to higher performance standards b/c audiences who had listened to the record now expected the same level of perfection in performance.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)is time intensive.
For something like a ten minute halftime show it's easier to do a prerecorded show
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)It's because they can't sing in the first place and the recording studio is where all the "magic" is done to make them sound sort of OK and sort of on something resembling a key.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Such coordinated dancing ain't easy, light show was exciting, etc. Doing a half-time show at Super Bowl ain't easy either. Good job.
Atman
(31,464 posts)My post is about Beyonce, and why she is considered such an awesome talent. Again, she performed someone else dance moves along with a few dozen othe women dancing the same moves. She can't play an instrument. She didn't design her set. And she hardly sang. She is eye candy. I the real creative people here were the people who designed the show.
malaise
(269,091 posts)You speak for my generation who prefer substance to form.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Saw her perform live twenty-five or so years ago. She COULD do all the stuff you mention and, although I'd never been a fan, particularly, I was just knocked out. I also saw Sammy Davis Jr. many years ago. Now HE was truly, impressively versatile. BTW, though I'm pretty old now, I was a young rock fan then.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)nothing really beats acoustic string band music as you described.
Check this out from the past here : http://www.democraticunderground.com/103434
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Thanks.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)" she was just shaking her half-naked body " OHYEAH!
That's the part I liked and I liked it better than a bunch of idiots chasing after a piece of plastic and pretending that it meant anything.
No, seriously, I get your point. But taken as a whole, not just Beyonce, it was a diverting entertaining musical multimedia presentation. Fun.
And watching pro sports is no more than a diverting entertaining multimedia presentation anyway.
That said, I switched over to see Fox cartoon repeats for much of the night. Football and most professional sports make me yawn. Waste of time and effort. At least, the cartoons make some political points occasionally.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)But this performance certainly didn't showcase much of it.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)However, I will agree with your assessment of this event and its performers. It was entertaining, but deserved neither the accolades nor the derision it is getting. Beyonce can be a damn good singer, but I don't think she sang all that great last night. Her singing, and her choices of songs were kind of "meh". Quite frankly, I was more impressed by the light show, and by the fact that she is able to run around a stage like that in five inch heels. That being said, as much as I was entertained by it, I would much rather have watched a re-run of the Prince show, or The Who, or the 2002 show with U2. To this day, I cannot listen to a song by Prince without thinking of his silhouette with that demonic penis guitar, and still be amazed that the network censors let that one by.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)I keed! I keed!
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I understand and appreciate what being a band, musician and performer are. But, unlike you, I also appreciate what a 'performance' is. You clearly do not.
Carry on with your 'get offa my lawn' rant.
Atman
(31,464 posts)You clearly had a problem understanding my post.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)As I said... carry on.
Atman
(31,464 posts)As I stated, you clearly didn't get it. I also compared her to the dozens of other women on stage dancing the exact same canned dance moves. Why is her performance so much more awesome? You also clearly don't understand that I certainly do understand what a "performance" is.
Lame response, Nikki, even by your usual standards.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)a performance and a 'band/singer/musician'.
Atman
(31,464 posts)It was merely, and obviously, intended as an insult, as if somehow you know enough about me, my musical taste and my background to pass judgement on me. That simply wasn't what my post was about.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)dragging in preconceived notions and previous disagreements into a topic!
Oh, wait....
Atman
(31,464 posts)JanMichael
(24,890 posts)and have to agree. Beyonce is a gorgeous young lady, and a product of the times. Many of the younger folks here don't seem to understand that the older people remember folks who could sing and dance, and do it really, really well. Even Madonna doesn't "need" exploding stuff backing her up...she can if she wants to...but, she dominates the sets with her talent.
I watched and thought "Michael Jackson would cry."
cali
(114,904 posts)Give me Grace Potter over Beyonce any day of the week.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)Talented beyond belief and also sexy and gorgeous.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)SDjack
(1,448 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts)... and only heard (rather than saw) the performance. My wife commented that she could not tell where one song ended and another began.
Musical taste is entirely subjective, but I do often suspect that a lot of artists get a pass (on their "talent" based on WHO they are and not any particular talent or ability. Sure Beyonce is a beautiful women, but artist? Just like Bieber is an artist.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)I'm one of those old farts and only saw glimpses of the show as, just like you, I come from a different place and time musically. However, if I want to see serious musicians, the last place I'm gonna go is to a football game! To me the Superbowl halftime shows are filler so they can shove in more commercials and people can load up on food.
The networks want eye candy...the NFL wants to try to be "hip" and the rest of us are wondering what's left in the fridge and checking out the porcelain palace. Be it Beyonce or The Who (who I admire and enjoy greatly) the halftime show is a poor venue to judge an artists' talent or popularity...
Cheers...
Atman
(31,464 posts)People who didn't see anything spectacular about Beyonce have been called all sorts of names and ridiculed for somehow not understanding what "performance" is. We're "old turds" for not agreeing that Beyonce is awesome. As I stated, but a few choice posters don't get (or don't want to get), I thought the show was amazing. Take that for what it's worth. But I didn't see why Beyonce was a better performer that her army of back-up dancers doing the same moves.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)There was nothing there to hold my attention.
The half-time show isn't really supposed to be a musical performance; the music is background. It supports the performance. Because it's the superbowl, the expectation for something BIG is automatic, and you end up with something BIG. I only watched 20 minutes or so of the whole game, and didn't bother with the halftime show. I never do.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I just want them to, "Get the hell off my yard!"
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)unplugged.
You ever hear Beyonce unplugged?
I have and she is amazing.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)bling for a while.
The great divas shined on their own without props.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)The day is young, you know.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Bacause, you know, she'll be back by popular demand and all that stuff.
Atman
(31,464 posts)The references to old singers from 50 years ago, and "get of my lawn," demonstrate that you don't really have any idea what my post was about.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)And I just might do an OP of my own on halftime shows.
But, even if I did, I don't expect everyone to agree with me.
They would just be my observations, as a guy who's immersed in music, pretty much all of the time.
I'm just wondering why you think all of that was a bad thing.
mnhtnbb
(31,397 posts)Her voice isn't what it used to be...but I'll take her in concert
any day over Beyonce.
Here's a photo I took of her (yes, it was a private performance and we were
allowed to take photos--but requested to do so only at the beginning of the concert
and not while she was singing).
[IMG][/IMG]
Romulox
(25,960 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)Really...strippers dance better that Beyonce and her troupe?
Possibly the silliest thing I've ever read on DU.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)rocktivity
(44,577 posts)"Respectable burlesque -- you can go to your local red light district and see a lot more of what she does for a lot less money."
rocktivity
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)That seems to be the new standard, eh?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)That was not musical entertainment, it was a "show" instead. At least the football still looks real, but i wonder how scripted it is too.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)I don't remember any good ones. Even when they have groups like the Rolling Stones perform without clothing/dancing/lip synching controversies.
It's simply not a good place to put on a good show.
SQUEE
(1,315 posts)It was U2, whose music I actually dislike after "Joshua Tree".. But damn what a performance..
I can't believe i had to read this far before someone mentioned the U2 show.
It not only was the best SB halftime show, I think it was one of the best 9/11 tributes.
ObaMania
(2,054 posts)Even to this day it brings a tear to my eye.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)It was a show, yes. But it was great, singing was great, and hardly a culural cancer.
?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Really. Do you expect something down beat with all the hype and pseudo religious fervor connected to football in this country?
I thought it suited the whole packaged deal quite well. The hype is nuts.
Just this last week there was all kinds of talk and articles about the dangers of football on the players who suffer brain damage and brain diseases because they play football. Yet it's totally forgotten as more athletes try to create more brain damage on each other. Professional football is like the Roman Coliseum games, only modern and death to the players comes slower.
And I just read an article here on DU about the human sex trafficking that goes on at these games but now I can't find it. It probably sank because it interferes with all that hype.
Crepuscular
(1,057 posts)Bring back the marching bands, much more enjoyable exhibition of talent than most of the crap that has been on in recent years.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)I had two tweens watching with great interest. Would have been nice if Beyonce toned it down a bit for the family hour. From that standpoint, I much preferred the Black Eyed Pea's half time. At least Fergie doesn't stripper dance.
Brainstormy
(2,380 posts)Couldn't understand a word of the lyrics. There were some lyrics, weren't there? All sound and fury, signifying cultural decline and the death of music. I'd rather have seen a high school marching band. Or yeah, the Andrew sisters.
Dollface
(1,590 posts)Disclosure: I like the Andrew's sisters and marching bands. I wish they would show half-time for college games. ;->
brush
(53,794 posts)DU has so many political progressives but many seem to be so behind the times on current music trends, regressive really. What happened to all the open-mindedness from the campaign? Beyonce put on a great show but so many here, like you said, sound like disapproving parents of the 50s and 60s rocker teenagers. What's next, bringing back the term "juvenile delinquent"?
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)I could go for that.
Maybe with a different school's marching band as warm-up act.
In many schools there's an overlap between marching and jazz, so you'd have to have two schools.
840high
(17,196 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)than all the ridiculous crap they call entertainment.
kydo
(2,679 posts)They are after all the professionals in marching band.
Drum Corp International groups would blow your mind.
Check it out at at dci.org
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)It would be far more entertaining (to me anyway) to see something like that as opposed to major label recording artists.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)I didn't see the half-time show, thought I'd throw that caveat out there from the start. That said, I'm know I'm biased when it comes to music and performers/musicians. IMO, there are 2 distinct types of musical acts... performers (Beyonce and her ilk) and musicians. I'm not saying that Beyonce doesn't have a phenomenal voice, she does but she isn't a musician in the way I look at things. I have much more respect for a group that stands on a dark stage, playing to a room of three than I do for a million-dollar light show--if I wanted to see a Broadway musical, I'd go to Broadway.
I think it's sad that no one seems to be noticing the point you made about the equally talented dancers, performing the same moves that Beyonce did. These women and men (I don't know if there were men but I don't want to leave them out) spend years perfecting their craft so they can make others look good and make insane amounts of money, while the dancers don't make nearly as much.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Blanks
(4,835 posts)It seemed like there was a little bit of 'you didn't build that'; thrown in there as well.
Why everyone is so impressed with a single individual at a half-time show that involved millions if dollars and thousands of man-hours really doesn't make sense to me either.
I would have been more impressed if they'd have fed the poor, or helped the homeless with the millions of dollars.
I watched about 30 seconds of the half-time show and I didn't think I'd like it. Not that I have anything against Beyonce; I rarely watch the half time shows - they just aren't something I enjoy. They seem like an incredible waste of resources to me. My wife watched it and she didn't have any comments.
yesphan
(1,588 posts)people spending years developing and perfecting their craft while hanging in the background
while someone else makes all the money is Taylor Swift.
You can bet her band is made up of world class musicians while she can't even sing without the use of autotuner.
Yet she makes millions...........
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)in the near future. I'm a substitute teacher and mentioned to a high school class one day that Taylor Swift can't sing. The girls looked at me like I was from another planet and the one boy who spoke up said, "Who cares? She's hot."
Yuck.
hlthe2b
(102,304 posts)But, the plasticized "creations" and the forced celebrity of the minimally talented overly produced/overly hyped just leaves me cold.
Beyonce has a voice when she chooses material and a venue to highlight it. The SB wasn't such a forum, but, rather a spectacle and thus her showmanship took front stage. I understand that and am not being critical.
But, back to Swift, Honestly, they are so over-hyping her, I think she is headed for a major "burn-out" backlash. And, yes, I agree. She really can NOT sing. Like Bieber--just a overly promoted creation. But, both Swift and Bieber appeal to pre-teens. I understand that and clearly those marketing them do as well... But, that will predictably give them limited "shelf-life"... Their time will come and go.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Maybe they were talented, and that is why you kept going back time after time.
"She was a prop in someone else's stage show."
I think she has more control over the show than you think. I believe she put lots of time into her show trying to perfect it. It is a big deal to her.
To each their own, I just don't see the need to degrade the person. That is what a number of your comments were meant to to.
"She was a prop in someone else's stage show." "I've seen a hundred strippers do the same moves." "I just can't stand packaged sugar pops." "Disney Channel dolls."
GET OFF MY LAWN. That just about sums up your rant.
Atman
(31,464 posts)And apparently you feel "to each his own" doesn't apply to me.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I have no problem with that. And you might not want to admit it, but your really did just have a get off my lawn moment. That is very clear.
I think Biebers music is awful. Doesn't mean that I belittle him. And that is what you have done in your rant. I used your own comments to back that up. I don't think it is all that big of a deal. Many people feel the need to do what you just did. I have heard a number of my friends say they "hate" JB. I then ask why they hate him. They say his music suck. So I have to bring them back down to earth and remind them that they don't hate JB, they just aren't a fan of his music. With many of the remarks in your op, you went to that place of hate.
Atman
(31,464 posts)I never said or implied I hate Beyonce. Not at all. She has a powerful voice, she danced well. BUT, the point you don't seem to want to acknowledge is that EVERY dancer on that stage also danced the exact same moves. Why was Beyonce's "performance" more special?
This has nothing to do with "get off my lawn," or hating anyone or even preferring older music (I don't, I'm downloading new music all the time and my car radio is usually tuned to SiriusXMU).
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"BUT, the point you don't seem to want to acknowledge is that EVERY dancer on that stage also danced the exact same moves."
I never even went to that point so I am not sure why you think I am failing to acknowledge it. Choreography often has multiple dancers doing similar moves in rhythm. That is nothing new. I also saw many instances where the dancers were not performing the exact same moves. You have said more than one time they did the exact same moves. If you watched the show, you would know they did not do the exact same moves. There were multiple instance where it was broken up.
Like I said, I am not big on Beyonce. I do think the show was entertaining. But some of the verbiage used was to clearly used to belittle her.
"I've seen a hundred strippers do the same moves."
"I just can't stand packaged sugar pops."
"She was a prop in someone else's stage show."
October
(3,363 posts)Very belittling, whilst claiming he likes her.
I don't see the point. Of course the other dancers were doing similar moves. That's what they were hired to do. Beyonce is the lead singer, and the cool part is that she can dance (and keep up with the professional dancers) too. In the dance world, that gets major props.
October
(3,363 posts)Maybe the reason Beyonce's performance/dancing seems more special to some (as you suggest) is because she's singing while dancing the same moves. In the past, a lot of lead performers (Beyonce is the lead) just sang while the dancers did all the impressive moves in the background. Nowadays, a singer has to be able to keep up with the dancers.
I happen to have 2 children aspiring to be professional ballet dancers. The woman can dance, and it's impressive because she trained to be a singer.
As dancers go -- they could all have all the best training in the world, but that doesn't mean all dancers are equal. Not by a long shot! Beyonce's background dancers no doubt had to audition to get a spot. The fact is, she hired them, and they were probably thrilled to be part of it all.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 4, 2013, 11:38 AM - Edit history (1)
The average DUer is my parents' age, but if one of you elderly cranks wants to scold me to pretend you're with it, feel free.
Dollface
(1,590 posts)If only there was some way to change the channel on your television so you would not be forced to watch something you don't like...maybe someday.
kevinbgoode1
(153 posts)You can get a look at Diana Ross, who did the halftime program in 1996 at the 30th Super Bowl here:
I will say it was considered one of the most spectacular shows to that date - particularly the end, when she exited the field in a helicopter. Not bad for a diva at the age of 52.
independentpiney
(1,510 posts)Diana Ross was the complete package for this type of event, she had the glamour and glitz, voice, and incredible songs.
hatrack
(59,587 posts). . . when the halftime show began, as I did.
Javaman
(62,531 posts)Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Who the hell cares what the "show" is during halftime?
It's load of media hype to keep your eyeballs on the television so you'll watch more of their commercials.
wercal
(1,370 posts)...but one of the best in recent memory.
The halftime show is always terrible.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)music, for the most part. Many bands and solo acts use song-writers as well.
Heidi
(58,237 posts)of first-world problems.
http://first-world-problems.com/
99Forever
(14,524 posts).. curmudgeon as some posters in this thread, someone please put me out of my misery.This is some of the same sort of bitter crap that was hurled at artists that are now considered icons of the music industry, when they were early in their careers.
But of course, the Music World should have stopped moving forward at the point you aged masters of all good taste deem appropriate, but alas, it didn't.
plethoro
(594 posts)ddddd
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)and the ones who are making fun of us today will be the source of ridicule in 20 years. It's just the way it is.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)in the last ten years. But Beyonce has a fairly good voice and actual talent. She isn't No Direction. Watch her tapes when she was young, she always could sing.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)at the Inauguration: "did she sing?" "did she lip synch?" "was it live?"...
I expected her to come out singing. She did more dancing and "coochie poppin" than she did singing.
As yes, there's the backing tapes. She "sang" to the backing tapes. Her background singers did most of the work as well.
Now, I now that it is a performance and dancing adds to the excitement. But again, Beyonce is a singer. An overrated singer, in my view, but a singer nevertheless. But she barely did that.
The media, afraid to criticize her for anything, went along with the hype: She was great! She was terrific! Greatest Super Bown Halftime show ever!! I disagree with all of that. She was mediocre at best. Boring at worst.
I'm disappointed because I really wanted her to showcase her vocal talent. She didn't do that.
meaculpa2011
(918 posts)My question is why is there a half-time show at all?
It's the most important NFL game of the year. World class athletes have endured a 16-game season, plus playoffs, to get to this point.
And then the entire tempo of the game gets turned on its head due to commercials, network promos, a half-time show, and (last night) a power outage caused by what the utility spokesman called, "and electrical abnormality."
I know it's all about TV money, but there has to a way for the networks to sell commercial time and promo their shows and personalities without ruining the flow of the game.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)to rest, regroup examine strategy and get re-inspired. But since we fans can't go hang out in the locker room they ("they" being "Football" - be it NFL, NCAA or local high school) give us something to watch so we don't get bored. Well, I imagine that is the goal. Tom Petty was the only performer in recent memory that didn't bore me.
I guess that's the crux - I love Tom Petty so his performance didn't bore me. Some folks like Beyonce so they weren't bored yesterday. It doesn't hurt my feelings if someone says they hated Tom Petty's performance - they get to like what they want. It shouldn't hurt anyone's feelings that some folks didn't like Beyonce's show.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)for some nightlife.
I'm a musician and have a tendency to naturally critically analyze everything I hear, ad nauseum. With dance pop, I don't do this because it's basically all the same and it doesn't make me think. Some of the women who have been pigeonholed into the role of cookie cutter dance pop singer have nice voices. Beyonce is a pretty good singer, IMO.
Beyonce may very well desperately wish that she could express herself like Regina Spektor, but the industry has made her a dance pop star, and that's what she does.
Here's some lyrics by Pink, (LA is LA Reid the record industry honcho)
LA told me, "You'll be a pop star,
All you have to change is everything you are."
Tired of being compared to damn Britney Spears
She's so pretty, that just ain't me
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)bullimiami
(13,099 posts)and I thought they did a bang up job on the lighting, set and production.
also I didnt watch any of the game. saw the halftime show on internet.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)How did "turd" become the insult of choice?
Are people reading my posts? http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=215650
12AngryBorneoWildmen
(536 posts)and I thought it was oversexed up. And it was boring.
progressoid
(49,992 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)JHB
(37,161 posts)Yes, I'm being deliberately obtuse, but hey, some of us don't give a damn and didn't watch it.
Burma Jones
(11,760 posts)Or perhaps have the Conference Runners Up play one quarter for third place........
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Lack of talent.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)brush
(53,794 posts)Not Me
(3,398 posts)It was entertainment. Free entertainment. (Which I think was pretty good, but that's my opinion.)
Don't like it? Take a bio break and come back later.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Glad it's not just me. Now, to listen to some Talking Heads...
MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)Your post is highly condescending and ignorant.
Many of us are well aware of what good music is but are still able to enjoy something that is supposed to be a spectacle, not a concert. It's nice to still be able to have fun from time to time without being hyper-critical.
I guess I'd just rather be a "young turd" than an "old fart."
brush
(53,794 posts). . . this allegedly progressive site. What's up with that?
Zoonart
(11,872 posts)Okay... I know that opener will get me immediately branded as a scold, but it really makes me sad that we judge our female entertainers by how well they work the pole. I am a huge football fan and enjoyed every minute of the game, but when I saw my two young (4 and 7) granddaughters sitting in front of the TV in rapt attention during Beyonce's performance it made me really sad. It's 2013 ... can't we get off the pole?
I like Beyonce. I think she was wonderful and inspirational at the inauguration. I don't care if she lip-synched. I used to work for an opera company and I know what nerves can do to a performance, how cold air intake effects the windpipe. I think she squanders her talent with penis pandering cultural degradation.
I know - SCOLD-CRONE! etc. I just hate to see little girls sold a bill of goods about fictional sexual empowerment one hand while having their real life bodily rights challenged at every turn. It's a bad mix.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)I was thinking the same thing. Three steps forward, five steps back for feminism it seems. Even the commercials, same old crap. Glad I don't have kids/daughters...
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)appleannie1
(5,067 posts)be in a competition to see who can come up with the most outrageous tune or something. Just sing the damn song and if you can't reach the high notes don't accept the gig.
aka-chmeee
(1,132 posts)The necessary notes are provided with the music. They sound like bagpipes....no way to stop the sound so fill in between notes with lots of gracenotes. The more extra notes, the more "AWESOME" the performance.
Stainless
(718 posts)I looked at him after "Bouncy" was gyrating about for what seemed like forever and said "Some people call that entertainment"! We both gave the halftime show a thumbs down.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... The only partial song she sang that I liked and that I think is her only claim to fame is "Put a
Ring On It". She can't seem to top that one. Otherwise, I too was disappointed in the half-time show last night. I liked the pregame show best. The Sandy Hook Children's Choir and Jennifer Hudson, and Alicia Keyes.
But. Atman, I'm an old turd too. Honestly, we can't deny the young turds their time. We were young once too, and personally I think our generation's music was the the greatest. I remember flying home several times when I was young when my grandma was very old (age 97) and sitting on the side of her bed with my guitar singing John Denver songs. She loved it, or at least the smile on her face said so. There was a strong musical gene running through our family, including grandma, my mother, and now my sister, my son. We are music lovers. And even though I didn't much care for last nights performance, it was music. I would rather have heard Beyonce than some country & western extravaganza. I would have turned that off, flat out.
Each to their own, Atman. Diversity is the spice of life, and all that. We didn't like this one, but I bet you we like the next one.
ecstatic
(32,717 posts)Many of the songs she sang last night aren't her best as far as substance, but they're number one hits that are easily consumed by the masses.
She has a lot more songs that speak for millions of young women in a way that other songs haven't been able to. What you saw last night isn't the entire picture. You saw Beyonce the performer, but you're not familiar with the Beyonce the songwriter or the singer. Even if you became familiar with it, you probably wouldn't understand as it probably doesn't speak to your experiences (just like how the Dodge Ram commercial did nothing for me nor anyone else in the room).
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)LOL
I agree with you.
Maybe the spectacle of it all plays much better in person.
I say bring back marching bands
appacom
(296 posts)- it wasn't a Beyonce concert A football half time show is a completely different genre, and Beyonce designed her thrilling show accordingly. Unlike Madonna, Paul McCartney and others who did mini concerts.
If you didn't like it, so be it. No need for the snark, and the ignorant criticisms and invidious comparisons..
It is common knowledge that Beyonce is a multi-talented entertainer, engaged in all aspects of her enterprises, from conception and design to execution. She is also a shrewd businesswoman, and generous humanitarian.
Google her, haters, before saying some of the dumb stuff I'm reading on here.
Dollface
(1,590 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Beyonce has written damn near every song since Destiny's Child started. She is a businesswoman in every single sense of the world.
Her performance has been universally hailed by those of us who embrace the 21st century. It's been referred to as a "triumph" by more than one widely read and respected news group. I read that after the Janet/Justin kerfuffle a few years ago, the Super Bowl responded by putting up entertainers like Bruce Springsteen, Tom Petty etc. That may be some people's idea of nirvana but that would bore the ever living sh*t out of me. And that would certainly explain why I have heard very little chatter about Super Bowl half time shows before the one Madonna did last year.
Google her, haters, before saying some of the dumb stuff I'm reading on here.
Would be nice if they did, wouldn't it? Hilarious that the "old turd" comment struck the OP so hard. And with 125 recs, he obviously aint' the only one hit by it.
plethoro
(594 posts)wasn't entertainment but rather a chance to walk away from the tv. I would have rather watched the The Three Chipmunks perform. At least they are cute when pantomiming falsetto. It's just a matter of changing tastes among the young. Not exactly The Doors.
Fredfon
(36 posts)He never lip-synched, always wrote the songs he performed and never was in any choreographed dance numbers.
MADem
(135,425 posts)mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)she has done a show like last night's show.
I never knew she could really sing until her inaugural performance.
It is hard to understand why a performer who can really sing would not have done one number where she showed off her beUtiful voice instead of just wiggling around the stage.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Didn't watch the halftime show, spent it surfing the web.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)A billion dollar spectacle was held up for a half hour because privatized infrastructure couldn't be held together for 5 hours by an overworked crew of $30,000 techs.
Seriously. The only people I was cheering for were the poor bastards who worked to get the power restored.
An over-hyped pop mega performance at an over-hyped mega sporting event.... color me shocked :p
Although NEITHER shows is my bag - I much prefer more intimate concerts- It wouldn't bother me in the least if if weren't for the recent article on how much money is wasted subsidizing the NFL.
Romulus Quirinus
(524 posts)the best live show I've seen lately is Dethklok.
I know it's a cartoon band, but Brendon Small can shred.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Whining about what it was like "back in the day" is crotchety and foolish. Life goes on. We don't make buggy whips any more.
I would wager that even Dancing Mick Jagger in the full flame of his youth forty years ago couldn't keep up with the aerobic input required by Beyonce to do that number for more than a minute and a half. What she did takes TALENT.
The kids nowadays want The Full Package. They want singing, dancing, a huge Ziegfeld-style floor show, and lots of bells, whistles, lights and firecrackers. They like their singers to look good, too. This isn't Kate Smith's music industry anymore. Showmanship rules. Some pimply "old turds" with long greasy hair, hunched over their guitars pursing their lips in self-important fashion, while some acid-tripping drummer bangs senselessly on his kit just doesn't appeal to today's youth. They want music they can MOVE to, not music to get stoned by.
And your suggestion that all genres of music cannot somehow coexist, that Beyonce somehow "edges out" the stuff you like, is equally silly. Basically, she appeals to the wider demographic, and that's why she got the Superbowl gig, but that doesn't mean people have to stop listening to Mozart.
You don't like her undeniable talent? Go poop during the halftime show. Let the dogs out. Make a cup of tea.
You're really being condescending to youth by first, calling them all young turds (despite the fact that one person--one single person--crafted the "old turd" meme here, that is no excuse to take that hurtful phrase created by a single person and flip it to disparage a whole cadre of people who are -- like it or not--the future of humanity), and second, by suggesting that they are somehow stupid because you don't share their taste in music. These young kids also like someone like Adele, who doesn't do what you disparagingly and inaccurately call "stripper moves" and whose talent is so profound that she (like Beyonce) can also sing a capella. Or perhaps you missed Beyonce's press conference?
You're generalizing about the younger generations like they are stupid, you're smart, they know nothing, and you know it all. Great way to encourage them to cut our social security and medicare when they start filling the halls of Congress!
So turn on your college radio, alt rock and "anything played by actual musicians." Let the kids enjoy their stuff. If you think about it, you sound a lot like the Lawrence Welk fans who used to criticize that "crap" you listen and love to as "not actual music."
Time marches on. Learn from the past, and don't be a jerky and intolerant geezer. Live and let live.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)Poster seemed to have taken every negative post he's read on the subject and attributed it me. I never said any of the stuff he bashed me for. You might have thought it was a "great post," but it had little to do with MY post.
MADem
(135,425 posts)happening ON THE FIELD. I think I may wait a long time while people rake Ms. Knowles over the coals!
Guys in painted on yoga pants were attacking others in excessively revealing skin tight mustard pantaloons and slamming them to the ground!
Excessively revealling clothing!!!
Violence!!!
Think of the CHILDREN....!!!!!
Why, oh WHY aren't these people who are worried about the delicate eyes of the children worried about THAT? Why didn't they just switch to the Puppy Bowl?
Oh, the huge manatee!!!!!!
Number23
(24,544 posts)Though I am really starting to wonder about all of the people saying that the half-time show should have been done by The Who, Lead Zeppelin (I'm probably not spelling that right) or other assorted oldies. You hit the nail on the head when you said:
Some pimply "old turds" with long greasy hair, hunched over their guitars pursing their lips in self-important fashion, while some acid-tripping drummer bangs senselessly on his kit just doesn't appeal to today's youth.
I left the "youth" stage of my life behind many a moon ago but I could not agree more with this sentence. Put Tom Petty or Springsteen on that stage and my ass would be knocked out within four seconds. As unfathomable as it may be for some to realize this, that music does not appeal to everyone and never has.
Beyonce is at the top of the music food chain right now and all of the hating and pining in the world for the good old boys of yesterday ain't gonna change that. And judging by the number of awards and record-shattering sales of her music, she is going to be there for quite some time.
bloom
(11,635 posts)I notice the half-time shows. I don't expect them to appeal to me. The whole Super Bowl charade does not appeal to me. (I streamed some of it on my laptop while I watched a movie).
It's an odd event the SB halftime show has evolved into - so much energy condensed into 15 minutes. I had been getting pretty tired of the Super Bowl having old men do the show instead of younger blood. Having 80 year old rock stars continue to do the show from wheel chairs would be rather absurd. Beyonce's show was appropriate for the venue - IMO.
Of course the whole thing is sexist, over the top, macho-hype nonsense.
brush
(53,794 posts)I'm disappointed with all the conservative musical attitudes on DU. What happened to all the progressives? Appreciating current trends in music doesn't mean you can't like Sinatra or Billie Holiday or Sarah Vaughan or the Beatles or the Stones or the Ramones. God, we're supposed to be the open-minded site.
MADem
(135,425 posts)And the songs from the roaring twenties that her daughter liked.
And I love James Brown, and Luciano Pavarotti.
These people that feel like they have to hew to a musical "line" end up in a big old trench!
It's ALL good to someone; treat it like a buffet!
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)The halftime show with The Who was probably the worst musical performance by professionals I have ever seen. Roger Daltrey in his advanced age can't hold a pitch and it sounds like he barely has any vocal cords left at all. If it wasn't for Pete Townshend, that would have been a mediocre performance for an amateur band. I thought Beyonce's show was entertaining and the only real disappointment I had was that Jay-Z didn't make an appearance.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Isn't it written with an accent on the last syllable?
That means it would be pronounced BEE-on-SAY, not be-YON-see.
IMHO, Destiny's Child was the most obnoxious sounds ever to emit from a human mouth. Nothing but gratuitous melismas ad infinitum. Not a recognizable melody anywhere. As a soloist, her music is a little better than Destiny's Child. But not much.
I've seen people here compare her to Whitney Houston. That is a crime. As a musician, she can't carry Houston's jock (or sports bra or whatever the metaphor would be.)
rivegauche
(601 posts)I'm an "old turd" too and I watched the game and the show. Beyonce is what she is - a young pop singer, very pretty and has some actual talent. So big fucking deal. It's a half-time show, not a cultural watershed moment. Some people need to lighten up.
Moostache
(9,897 posts)I watch the Super Bowl because I am a football fan and this despite only having witnessed 4 Super Bowls that had the participation of my favorite teams. I do not watch to see over-produced music videos and hate the fact that halftime - which in the regular season lasts a very heavily scripted 15 minutes - is nearly triple that for the Super Bowl. I would rather have them pack that time with all their bullshit advertising feces and just get back to the game.
Last night's ridiculous "show" and the ensuing power outage came dangerously close to influencing the outcome of a sporting event. San Francisco was on their ass and in real danger of getting blown out before the power outage saved them...minus the 45 minute halftime, that power outage would have been 30 minutes later and to anyone watching the game, that 30 minutes seemed very likely to be a knock-out blow to the Niners...
Beyonce and Prince and Madonna and all the rest are great perrformers, but we do not have an opera at halftime or a symphony or a Broadway production or a short movie...oh well, if nothing else Beyonce was not over the hill and completely washed up like most of the rest of the halftime shows of late...
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)They could bring back "Up with People"
MADem
(135,425 posts)The bigger, the better. People look forward to it and they like seeing a real "topper" of a production. This has been going on for decades, well before you decided to participate as a spectator. They aren't going to change the paradigm to suit you.
Wow, your bitterness is extraordinary!
The power outage made the event memorable. And the 30 minutes wasn't a "knock out blow to the niners"--it put them back in the game. They were on their ass, losing by double digits, and that delay enabled them to regroup and almost come close enough to overtake the Ravens. The power outage turned a rout of a game, a dull, foregone conclusion, into an exciting contest.
And who has declared that it was the "fault" of the half time show that there was a power problem? I'd say a venue of that size that can't handle a shitload of lighting and pyrotechnics needs refurbishment. That was a short version of a major concert production, it wasn't anything that should have taxed a venue the size of that stadium.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'm presupposing that most people have rather varied opinions about subjective forms of entertainment-- music being one of them. Some people may enjoy her music and believe she's an awesome singer, while others may not, regardless whether one may think she's manufactured (much like The Monkees-- one of my favorite bands when I was young) or not.
I've always thought that if we give those things we do enjoy the same attention we give to those things we don't, we'd be much happier as both individuals and collectively. And to be honest, "That's just the way my taste runs..."
"For our differences in taste, we've been pilloried on DU...". I'd imagine that it's not so much the leaning of our likes and tastes, but the negative way and the vulgar form in which we tell others of what we may find distasteful. For example...
"I've seen a hundred strippers do the same moves.", " She was a prop in someone else's stage show..." "I just can't stand packaged sugar pops..." Which to me, sounds much like something a "turd" would say, regardless of whether he is young or old...
adamhide
(1 post)Seriously? DO you realize that it is mostly "old turds" buying B's music. The ironic this, is I listen to college rock, most of my friends listen to college rock, and we are well out of college, but it is our parents that think that Beyonce is cool, not us...
(for the record, I did not even watch the Superbowl)....
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Or some house techno. Deadmau5 for the next superbowl halftime debacle!
Atman
(31,464 posts)We hit a great night at The Webster in NYC not too long ago. Skipped most of the rope line because our very pretty wives wore see-through tops -- and one of them happened to be a 28 year old Asian. Boom...we were in! Love that shit! I know that will piss some people off, but that's how it is. And that's why it pisses ME off that so many on this thread keep posting "get off my lawn" and "Andrew Sisters" and you think I'm just an old prude because of the outfits. You don't know fuck about me! Hell, I dl'd JayZ's "The Grey Album" in 2004, when it was still illegal, back when some of these punk asses were still in high school. My music collection spans most everything -- EXCEPT the old stuff you keep accusing me of listening too. I don't even like early Beatles. I sure as hell never listened to Andrew Sisters or Lawrence Welk.
And I'm getting schooled for saying I think Beyonce sucked because I'm just old?! BWHAHAHA! That's rich.
More popcorn anyone?
libodem
(19,288 posts)As far as I'm concerned. The dancers tip toed in baby steps in those spike heeled boots. And the rest of the moves could have been made by somebody holding on to a stripper's pole. I called it the "humpty dance". Not impressed with the crotch thrust forward, knees as far apart as possible squat in your face, dance style. Gross.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)I thought it was the best half time show I've seen. I didn't care for the songs, but that is a generational thing. The dancing was very good. It was high energy and it was a turn on, celebrating sexuality. Beyonce did the dancing better than the others (I was looking), but that is probably because she hires the others to do her moves. It is clear she practices the dancing constantly. She has a mastery over it that matches Eleanor Powell or Cyd Charisse. No, I don't think you can sing while dancing that well and that energetically, but what do I know.
Her eyes engage the audience. I don't know whether she was singing or lip synching. I've heard her national anthem without accompaniment during the last week. She can do it.
I suppose I wouldn't want my daughters idolizing this, but I don't have any kids. It was sexual and about sex. Unashamedly.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)about the guy in the Calvin Klein ad.
Why is that?
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I also did not like the Super Bowl Halftime show. I did not like the fact that Beyonce did not do much singing. I would have liked it if she had song at least one full song. I perfer halftime show were the performer sings much of his/her music.
Bake
(21,977 posts)I couldn't agree more!!
Bake
Bluzmann57
(12,336 posts)They should have had New Orleans music. Maybe the Neville Brothers or Doctor John or the Dirty Dozen Brass Band or ...Well you get the idea. This is something I have always said, feature talent from the city where the event is being held. For instance, if the World Series or all star game ever come to Chicago, Mr. Buddy Guy or any of a HUGE number of great Blues musicians would be an excellent choice for entertainment. And every city has at least one famous entertainer hailing from there or somewhere near it seems. So even if it's country, feature locals as entertainment. Please.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)I was thinking exactly that. Incredible New Orleans musicians to choose from. And they could use escalating scale, start with lesser known but talented people and ending with the area's best superstar, whoever that is. Meters, Nevilles, Galactic, Marsalis family, hell even Harry Connick Jr. or whatever his name is. New Orleans is full of vital, genuine music that is the soul of that city, and instead they give us vacuous pop schlock.
On a larger level, I think it is a sad cultural commentary on our country. We prefer spectacle over art, titillation over true emotional content. Frankly, on a vibe level, this year's halftime show felt evil, and would make a great example for critics of our culture in the Islamic world to hold up as a cancer that needs to be eliminated. An aggressive, war-loving, conquering culture that has no respect for anything but affluence, success, and power. Sad that this is such a large part of our culture.
There is plenty of real heart and art in this country, it just isn't valued by the zeitgeist.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)I like the Stones as much as the next person, but for God's sake -- Detroit?! The Avett Brothers and other NC musicians would be perfect for Charlotte. And think of the possibilities in Nashville...
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)a la izquierda
(11,795 posts)I teach university. I am only in my 30s. I think what most of my students listen to is god awful. But I'm not their ears nor their brains, so what do I care what people younger than me listen to? I don't care what people older than me listen to either.
Nobody was forced to watch the half time show. Don't like it? Change the channel. Me, I just envisioned The Clash on stage doing their thing, and put on the Puppy Bowl. And if you don't like the Puppy Bowl, well then you're a commie (kidding, for the humor impaired).
Johonny
(20,856 posts)Just don't see why people pay to watch "live" music that isn't live. I'm sure people enjoy the dancing and songs seem very professionally smooth. But the prop stage feel sort of has a "so what feel". In a way most performers are props in other people's stage shows so Beyonce isn't unique. It isn't new either as MGM was making big production shows as soon as movies had sound. The show was good for what it was, but I'm not convinced Beyonce is that irreplaceable to her own act. Beyonce is clearly talented, but is she the OMG unique talent so people think. Then again does it matter, a lot of things in life are based on lucky breaks. Most famous performers are not so irreplaceable and who is BIG and who is small has more to do with breaks than talent.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)I guess that would be a fresh one still warm?
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)I thought everything was as it should be. Neil Young would go over their heads and Springsteen singing about taking care of our own would be a bummer.
People want explosions, spectacle and sexual excitement. They want to be titillated. We are watching a game being played by men in tights who are some of the highest paid professionals in the country who are taught by our highest paid "educators" in college to provide excitement for commercial breaks. She fits the bill 100%. As would Bieber, Timberlake or any other modern equivalent of musical talent.
You gotta take it all in context.
GCP
(8,166 posts)But she didn't really sing anything IMHO. (From an old turd, who saw many of the 60s greats live).
alfredo
(60,075 posts)Remember Fabian and Nancy Sinatra? What about the Archies? The Archies didn't tour or make live appearances because they didn't exist as a band.
If dance is a big part of the show, they have to lip-sync. Run a 100meter dash, then try to sing.
She can sing, but it comes down to taste in music. I'd rather go see Mariza or Sam Phillips.
BTW, American Bandstand music was lip-sync.
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)the fact is that she can move millions of product off of the store shelves, sell out concerts all the world over and appeals to a lot of people, both young and old, who do not deserve to be called out of their names by someone who can't understand her appeal.
They once said the exact same thing about Elvis.
randr
(12,412 posts)personal taste in music
Response to randr (Reply #203)
mac56 This message was self-deleted by its author.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Beyonce is good on the eyes, but IMO is not a remarkable vocalist. She doesn't really match up well against the talented vocalists of the last few musical eras.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)That lady's body was completely covered up to her shoulders. Her outfit was form fitting, but she was completely covered. Look at the video again. She had boots on, she had stockings on, she had tights on. Her entire torso was covered in leather and lace and the parts that looked like her flesh was showing, was flesh colored material. It wouldn't surprise me if was a full body stocking sewn into the leather and lace teddy she was wearing. She is an entertainer and she was there to entertain.
She had more clothes on than the guy on the KK commercial and no one is fussing about that.
Atman
(31,464 posts)If you really want to measure the square inches of skin, she's was probably half-naked. But the was a very minor partial sentence of my post.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)You say it was a minor point in your post, but it tells me something about what people think they saw and are basing some of their negative comments on that.
I have no opinion of her performance, I didn't see it. I did see pictures of what she had on though and felt I had to point out that with the exception of her head, neck, shoulders and arms. She was completely covered.
maybe I'm commenting in the wrong thread?
Atman
(31,464 posts)Again, I don't really care about that. My post was about her overall talent as displayed in this performance. She came out on stage in an already hot outfit. I get that...she's a pop star. But as part of the choreography, the other women on stage proceeded to remove layers of clothing. It stopped at what you see in all the highlights....but who knew? It was clearly designed as a stop-show...will someone remove more of her leather outfit? She hardly sang at all, she just did a strip show, but didn't actually get naked. You know, the ones they do at "burlesque" houses in places where you can't serve liquor where people are naked. Probably the places Trumad hangs out, since he claims to have never seen a real stripper.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,185 posts)This Ravens fan was a little too excited about the actual game.
I actually paused the Super Bowl TV live at halftime, put the kids to bed, and then fast forwarded through the entire thing, stopping about half-way through Jacoby Jones' 109 yard kickoff return (wish I would have seen THAT live!)
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)that being said, I don't understand what all the fuss is. When halftime is on, I just surf until it is over.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)I'm a roadie. I have worked with many many bands. Many you have heard of I understand exactly what you are saying. The shit that passes for music these days is sad. Used to be you went into the garage, you banged out a bunch of songs with your friends, then you gigged incessantly in clubs honing your chops and your stage skills. By the time you got on the road you were a seasoned player.
Now you go down to your local stadium when American Idol comes to town and "audition". Then if you get picked you get told where to sing, what to sing, how to sing, how to dress, how to hold the mic, how to stand, how to walk and how to play to the camera. You are focus grouped into some generic version of a pop star.
We thought we killed Disco in the late 70's. We were wrong. It came back in a dozen other forms, Rap, Hip Hop, House, Electronica, Pop, Dubstep.. it's all freakin disco music.
If it's any consolation my kids 3 teenage boys agree with us. My oldest likes some of the current music but his favorites are Buddy Holly and Queen.. My middle son has an affinity for AC/DC and my youngest is a Floyd and REM fan.
The record industry is dying, soon most artists will be using things like Reverb Nation to release their own material. While you won't see bands selling 20 million records anymore you will see a larger variety of bands making a decent living doing it on their own.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Seriously. Good vocal mixing. We encouraged him along the way by buying him an eight track mixing board for his Mac, and he plugged in his keyboard, his mic, his guitar, and layered it with loops from GarageBand. It's as good as anything I've heard on "college radio." But how do you make a living now? He's going on tour with his MacBook?
It reminds me of long ago, going to see World Party at Stowe Vermont. WP consistent of Mark Wallinger of The Waterboys. That was it. He played every instrument, sang every vocal. And this was long before the MacBook or GarageBand. Old fashioned tape loops. So when he play "live," he had to hire session musicians to re-create the stuff that he had originally recorded. It sounded perfect. Too perfect. Between the loops and the session musicians sticking to script, there was no life to the concert. I could have sat in a field and listened to a big loud amp playing one of World Party's CD's.
That's why Beyonce has to do a million-dollar stage show, and what "the kids" don't understand. Bands used to rely on their talent, and cheap shit like a cherry picker (to hover Mick Jagger over the crowd with a wireless mic!) or some douche like David Lee Roth, drunk off his ass, jumping off the drum set onto a tumbling mat. It was lo-rent, but the music was always REAL. Super real. They make up for it now with pyrotechnics, a hundred dancers, and lip syncing. And they charge $140 a ticket.
BTW, the last major show I saw was Peter Gabriel's New Blood Orchestra...call me an old fart, but it was one of the finest concerts I've ever seen. He had the giant JumboTron screens all over the place. Many of the same effects and lighting features Beyonce used...but he had a REAL 46 piece orchestra, plus a band that played real music while he sang real songs. I know that is not what the SB halftime show is for, but it saddens on of my boys has only been dragged to a Hillary Duff arena show by his girlfriend, while my other son has at least camped in a soggy field for a weekend for a multi-stage rock-fest with twenty bands. But shit...I used to see three or four major arena shows a summer. Now, no one can afford one, and if you do, you're seeing pre-packaged pap. It's just sad. That's all I'm saying.
These damned kids think they know music -- GET OFF MY LAWN!
Skittles
(153,169 posts)I DETEST most of today's shit "music" and I DETESTED DISCO back in the day - I did not consider it real music! Maybe I was spoiled by Radio Caroline which I picked up off the east coast of England. And may I say your children are awesome?
DaveJ
(5,023 posts)In any objective sense that halftime show was a magnificent. No comparison to a guy playing guitar in a coffee shop or on college radio. The vast majority of those guys, BTW, wouldn't think twice before accepting a gig like that. Most of those guys take up guitar because they are trying to get laid.
Nobody believe Beyonce created the set, which is part of what made the show great. This show is for those who respect teamwork, what can be accomplished as a part of a great collaborative effort. I find solitary artists mean spirited and pretentious, in most cases.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)You, PeaceNikki, LanternWaste, etc, etc, etc...you think you have some incite, but you don't know a thing about what I posted.
Atman
(31,464 posts)You forgot to say we should have the Andrew Sisters play at the next Super Bowl.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)and art and culture.
I have a massive album and CD collection of all kinds of music. I grew up on 70s rock music, played The Smiths and The Ramones on college radio as a DJ and was in Chapel Hill during the 90s alternative movement. Tell me how you know I don't have any insight.
Anyway, it was a just a joke! I'm sorry I didn't notice that PeaceNikki had already made it.
ON EDIT: What's this "same old tired posters?"
Atman
(31,464 posts)"The kids" will laugh at your CD collection. A CD is what they used to burn MP3s to so they could trade music with friends. Our "old curmudgeon" version of mix tapes.
I have about 1,500 CD's in boxes in the basement. Every now and then I recall a song I miss and go digging through them. I've burned probably 1/4 of them to my Mac. My music library is by far the largest hard-drive eater on my computer. Even at a curmudgeonly 53 years old, I still LOVE new music. That is why I have little patience for the children who think they know better. Fuck 'em. Don't judge a person by their DU post. I was labeled an old curmudgeon because I didn't like Beyonce's staged performance. I guarantee most of those people would be happy to trade me for much of my music collection (but that's not legal, so I won't do it).
Just sayin'. Not all of us "old curmudgeons" are curmudgeons. Get over your fucking selves.
alfredo
(60,075 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Beringia
(4,316 posts)The whole packaging of these pop stars is to make the most money possible.
I imagine if Norah Jones rolled around in whip cream between playing the piano, she could make more millions too. Or maybe not because some of her fans would feel they were being played, no pun intended.
Beyondce and Super Bowl = Dog and Bone
Flatulo
(5,005 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)AHA! A little Taco Bell on my cajones!
Skittles
(153,169 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)So, yeah, it means nothing. Unless you actually think about it.
What other subjects drums up these numbers? People (even DUers) respond to what they relate to, and/or are passionate about. If this thread got 10 recs, sure, you win. That would be a normal response. But it didn't. It got serious response.
What does that mean?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"What does that mean? "
That you enjoy the self-validation of mere opinions regarding a musician. But I imagine you believe it means something else.
Response to LanternWaste (Reply #248)
Post removed
TxVietVet
(1,905 posts)I'm seen strippers do the same things also. I've seen Asian girls lip-sync American many, many times. Byonce is like many in the 'country' music field today. They are selected by music promoters and publishers to be the 'new' style. Their appeal is basically if they look sexy, wiggle around a bit, that's what they are going to sell the public. Most of them could not play an instrument if their lives depended on it. It's almost canned music with a presenter on stage.
If what someone like Byonce does is great talent, then I don't need that type of great talent. The Stones, the Eagles, the Beatles and many many more are great talent. Some like the Who still produce great stage shows. Byonce couldn't carry water for them
I also listen to NPR and Public Radio because it's not the same recycled, lack of talent crap.
Soundman
(297 posts)I didn't watch the game but after reading through all of the posts here today it prompted me to go watch the video, all 13 plus minutes of it. Here is my professional opinion. The stagecraft was really good. The pyro and other effect lighting seemed to trigger in perfect time. The choreography was so so, a 5 out of 10. She seemed to be in the wrong spot during the synchronized portion. The dancing was nothing special at all. Michael Jackson she ain't, not even in the same league. The vocal performance was good. She hit a few notes that I thought were very pleasing, but nothing so special to warrant it as the best show ever. But then again Beyonce doesn't float my vocal boat. I thought her outfit was hot, hot, hot. She is a gorgeous woman and that is her main asset in my opinion. The guitar with the sparks was flat out retarded. A guitar is an instrument not a stage prop.
Anyway I would rate the overall performance as a 7.5 out of 10.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Her music just isn't my cup of tea, but musical taste is subjective and just because something doesn't appeal at all to my ears doesn't necessarily make it bad. I too am old school and I personally think that singers like Sarah Vaughan, Ella Fitzgerald, Gladys Knight, Aretha Franklin, Etta James, Dinah Washington among others could sing circles around Beyonce, both in terms of sheer voice as well as in terms of emotive interpretation. But I guess I'm just an old turd, too.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Now THAT was singing! I am neither old nor young, but most of the music I love was made before I was even born (I am also a big classical music fan). I love classical jazz and even classic rock, but pop has never been my thing. It all sounds the same to me. I have nothing against Beyonce, but her music just isn't my thing.
I did not see the halftime show, but I have seen some clips of it and I did not find it particularly offensive. However, I did not find it particularly interesting either. It just doesn't resonate for me.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)none of them sound good to me. Quite frankly, I can't tell most of them apart. Love the artists you listed above, particularly Etta James, who I got to see live. Her singing "At Last" gave me chills; Beyonce singing it confirmed my belief that certain classics just shouldn't be touched. Like anyone but Brando playing Stanley Kowalski...
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)it childish to try to ridicule older people that might not like what you like. (wasnt aimed at the OP but the poster that thought he would try to ridicule those that disagree with him). I personally dont like the halftime shows. When it comes to using more rockets, more dancers, more gimmicks, to try to make a good performance, you lose me. If you like that, more power to you. I have nothing against Beyonce and I certainly dont care if she lip syncs, but I wouldnt go across the street to see her.
aka-chmeee
(1,132 posts)Now, something like a mini Clapton's Crossroads Concert would make a kick butt half time.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)I love it. And I am amused by the young turds who have a problem with this.
Phaedrus76
(25 posts)
My problem with show was, well, the show. The young turds keep saying what a great singer/performer Beyonce is. But I saw 20-30 other women on that stage dancing the exact same steps as Beyonce, against a million-dollar backdrop of lighting, video displays and pyrotechnics. Beyonce wasn't even singing (or lip syncing) for much of the time, she was just shaking her half-naked body while stuff blew up, and lights flashed in a display which probably sent a few epileptics into shock.
...
Meh. I've seen a hundred strippers do the same moves. Beyonce didn't write the music, didn't build the stage, didn't fire off the rockets, hell, she can't even play an instrument. She was a prop in someone else's stage show.
Yeah, so Beyonce was the first singer that was pretty, and a good dancer, and benefited from a good stage, choreographer and technicians?
Have you ever been to a Rolling Stones' concert? What does Mick Jagger do, other than growl, gyrate and watch the Keith Richards play guitar?
Did Elvis Presley have some "pelvis" issues?
More news for you old timers, uh, those Jazz legends, yeah, uh, Cole Porter's "Let's Do It" is a double entendre. And the other entendre is the two people will be having sex. Hard, sweaty sex. And unless the recording you hear is Cole Porter singing, the person you hear did not write it, is probably using someone else's arrangement, and got to that point in their career because they have nice tits/ ass/ pecs/ eyes/ etc.
For further reference, research fat, ugly successful musicians and lead actors.
Atman
(31,464 posts)I've been to two Stones concerts.
Harry Monroe
(2,935 posts)As far as I'm concerned, they can just bring back the marching bands. I have not and never will watch the Super Bowl for the halftime show. A marching band will fill in just as well.
glowing
(12,233 posts)approach with her entire show, including costumes, and has been since Destiny Child Days, then u wouldn't sound like a judgemental person. I think that group may actually be responsible for making that sort of dance uniform more widely chosen by other artists to dance in. I believe the reason for the high cut outfits is show off the legs and her power house dance routines, and no, that is very skilled dancing. Stripping is all about slow sensual moves; not the high power dance energy that her performances are known for.
As far as sound goes, the half time show doesn't usually play well on TV. The arena sound music being pumped in around people in attendance along with the singer coming in on live microphone picked up through the TV, has never showcased any artist in a favorable light.
If one had never been exposed to Beyonce, her power house shows, her talent on songs that aren't "club dance showcases" and know her outside work with worldwide charities and causes, then the show was probably more unappreciated by you.
For me, in college, the group was one of the top played groups featured alongside men in a hip- hop/ R&B type of music that was pumped into the clubs and that young women and men would dance and grind to. It was "power to the female- I'm worth a lot- ain't going to take men shit, but will recognize respectful love" type of messaging. Most women my age who grew up with her on the radio and her fist pumping, women rock, my body is hot with curves and muscled legs and no need to enhance a chest or what not to be beautiful and comfortable and rock.
Perhaps, that's why many on the boards are saying she is talented and super woman. She's one of the reasons for some of the other female artists are able to compete alongside men in the same venue and be a "serious" heavy weight in the music industry. They designed their own clothes. Many times as a group, at award ceremonies, the group was wearing their own designs in a "group look" but with their own individual flairs to change the outfit to express themselves.
Personally, I thought she was widely enough known that people would recognize her various hits over the years and recognize her former 2 group members that came on stage with her for a couple of songs. Then again Lady Gaga and Pink probably would get the same type of reviews for their performances.
Atman
(31,464 posts)The designer talked about his design. HIS design. But Beyonce kept losing weight, do he kept having to revise it. But oh yeah...Beyonce designed all the outfits. Fantasize on. Me all gotta have our heroes.
glowing
(12,233 posts)I'm saying that she has and the outfit was very typical of something she'd wear and many stars wear on stage.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)was a bombastic piece of poetic justice and somewhat fits where America is "at" right now. The Super Bowl, like many things in our society, has become just another opportunity to squeeze as much cash out of a duped populace as possible. That is proven literally in the fact that the game is no longer as important as the commercials that are shown. Even websites that used to be reputed for substance, such as CNET, chime on and on about the cost of the commercials. It speaks incredibly loudly about what we value as a society. We are watered down, lacking depth and substance, and digitized.
It's been reported that Beyonce's rehearsals also caused the lights to go out. The million dollar light show was most likely the cause of the power outage which leads one to ask "is it possible we demand too much to be entertained?" I saw a lot of lights and a lot of leg and not much else. Where was the emotion? Where was the connection that music is supposed to bring? Where were the goosebumps that come from hearing the greatest singers amongst us? They were not on that stage and that is what's sad and says so much about us.
We as a society have become sanitized with generic American Idol singers who all sound the same. In these days of digitally compressed everything we have lost our uniqueness and our ability to just be and breathe. That is why the bombast is there. To cover up the fact that there is no emotional connection. There is no substance.
Another thing that comes to mind is that the Super Bowl is in and of itself a microcosm of the larger game of war. And we are a warring nation that is now reflecting on a decade of war and confusion in regards to why we fight. I find it ironic that after the lights went out because the "show" was too bombastic, the other team very nearly won the "game." (For those not in the know Google Rudyard Kipling The Great Game) I know my analogy is a touch extreme but American football as a whole must be a psychologist favorite sport to analyze. And don't get me started on the homosexual undertones that exist with terms like "wide receivers", "tightends", and "fullbacks". Or is it just me thinking these things! Ha!
Nonetheless it's a violent sport that mirrors war and taking territory while throwing bombs and gaining ground with a lot of ass slapping. All the while we cheer like good Romans and gather the next day at the water cooler or on Facebook and pontificate loudly about what took place. That's entertainment!
And that entertainment keeps us happy. Blinded but happy or so it would seem. The Super Bowl is the respite from the problems we face as a nation. It's part of our national consciousness. A reason not to dwell on what plagues us. On one positive note ( I don't have too many) the Sandy Hook children were there reminding us of who we are and what we currently stand for and need to change. Their presence was definitely the highlight for me. Apart from that it was business as usual.
To me the superficialness of the half time show is a chance to look inward and ask ourselves what are we really about. Everything is digital, everything is similar, everything is in "your" face. But what I think is lacking and what the world needs to see from us is the putting aside of our American ego. The world doesn't want us to be louder or more nationalistic. It wants us to focus inward to think, to feel, to understand compassion and emotion. We needed a half time show that shows we are human beings and not automatons. We need songs on the scale of "Imagine" sung by maybe a Mary J. Blige (who incidentally has real soul) or a Teo Torriatte (obscure Queen song about togetherness for those not familiar)Instead we had the bombast and the power outage. We had poetic justice. That's what I saw. Here's to hoping next year is better.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)what the halftime show has to offer. Much Ado About Nothing.
How come no one cares that the power outage was caused by an al Qaeda cell funded by OJ Simpson.
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)flashy crap with smoke and a hundred back up dancers. IIRC they carried her onto stage as if she were some kind of Goddess.
I also saw Springsteen perform at the Super Bowl ,I believe 3 or 4 years ago. I do not remember him needing a bunch of that crap to make him look good.
dead_head
(81 posts)Hi to the people of DU.
I'm a dude in his 30's from Canada and I know NOTHING about football and NOTHING about Beyonce and her type of music so I can't juge that event. I know that I like R'N'R really a lot. But I found funny that the discussion got to the point of are the R'N'R' bands that plays, The Who and The Stones too old for that. It got me thinking.
Long story short, I had a discussion about that recently (but not just about the Superbowl) and I think the powers that control the media sucks. (we all know that) and they will never put a good band thats not been around for 40 + years in those spotlights. I find that sad.
But if those peformers where lipsincing though I can't understand why some people would defend that.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)SilveryMoon
(121 posts)I'll be sure to consult with you on if something is good before making up my mind.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)did her half time show I don't remember all of the talk about her outfit, lack of singing while dancing, or dislike of dance music. but b does it and it's the end of the world. hatred are going to hate. lol.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)The quality of the music -- as long as it doesn't interfere with the quality of the spectacle -- just doesn't matter.
And while I personally found the show ridiculous, I can't complain that it wasn't spectacular. And for the record, half-naked women dancing provocatively is absolutely culturally appropriate to the moment.
And as for the notion of "not a nickel for fun until all the world's problems are solved . . ." well, that just validates how painfully apt your self-selected appelation seems seems to be.