Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,080 posts)
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:32 AM Feb 2013

For too long organized labor has failed to ask the Dems, ‘Which side are you on?’


from In These Times:


Time for Democrats to Pay Their Dues
For too long organized labor has failed to ask the Dems, ‘Which side are you on?’

BY James Thindwa


The swift passage of Michigan’s so-called right-to-work legislation in December cemented a stark reality for labor: U.S. workers have been left without a national political party to champion their interests. Many local Democratic leaders—and a few members of Congress—still join the struggle for union rights, but aside from union-friendly rhetoric deployed around election time, the national party is disengaged.

The fact is, the success of the American labor movement has always depended upon a welcoming policy environment facilitated by an allied political party. While many forces are contributing to labor’s decline, we can no longer ignore a central one: The once-reliable Democratic Party has abandoned the cause. However, the party remains heavily dependent on labor for financial and organizational infrastructure. The Center for Responsive Politics reports that unions spent $1.1 billion between 2005 and 2011 supporting federal candidates for office. In 2008 alone, according to the New York Times, labor laid out $450 million to elect Barack Obama. If the state-by-state GOP war against unions is aimed at a primary source of electoral support for its opponent, why hasn’t that galvanized Democrats?

Indeed, Democrats have had ample opportunities to uphold workers’ rights. Unprecedented income inequality; attacks on labor in Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan; and a low-wage business model that saps the wealth of workers and communities provide a natural pivot for Democrats to push a pro-labor agenda. But there have been no takers, in Congress or the White House.

Congressional Democrats have failed to revive the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) to liberate the 60 million workers who want to join unions. And not one Democrat in Congress sponsored a resolution repudiating the GOP’s attack on unions in Wisconsin and Michigan. .............................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/14445/time_for_democrats_to_pay_their_dues/



11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
1. Trumka's "had a snootful of that shit!"
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:36 AM
Feb 2013
He described the now-familiar scenario in which Labor stood ‘holding the canceled check’ after elections, waving it at politicians in reminder, only to have Obama and the Congressional Dems ignore their promises to Labor: no moves to pass EFCA , trade policy, and an underwhelming defense of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

“Well, I don’t know about you, but I’ve had a snootful of that shit!”

“When it comes to politics, we’re looking for real champions of working women and men. And I have a message for some of our “friends.” It doesn’t matter if candidates and parties are controlling the wrecking ball or simply standing aside—the outcome is the same either way,” he explained. “If leaders aren’t blocking the wrecking ball and advancing working families’ interests, working people will not support them. This is where our focus will be—now, in 2012 and beyond.


http://my.firedoglake.com/wendydavis/2011/06/08/trumka-has-had-%E2%80%98a-snootful-of-that-shit%E2%80%99/

I think Trumka would be an awesome Secretary of Labor.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
3. good. Unions seem to hold more power than individuals.
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:44 AM
Feb 2013

Maybe if they started withholding their support politicians would notice.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
2. The Democratic Party is not a labor or progressive economics party
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:43 AM
Feb 2013

It is mostly a coalition of consumerism, environmentalism, civil rights, public employee interests, and urban real estate interests.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
4. but the party relies on them heavily to knock on doors
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:45 AM
Feb 2013

and get the vote out. It would hurt if the labor unions started pulling their support.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
6. The industrial unions are already pulling their support
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:58 AM
Feb 2013

As the OP says, they get nothing back from the Party.

The public employee unions aren't going anywhere.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
8. I don't know. Privatization is leaking into every public institution.
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 12:07 PM
Feb 2013

The industrial unions may have felt it first, but the republicans and corporations are attacking every public institution we have. It won't be long before the public employees feel it too, and if the democratic politicians won't fight privatization then the public employees will have to make a decision as well.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
9. Both parties are having trouble keeping their coalitions together.
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 12:14 PM
Feb 2013

I wouldn't be surprised to see the US evolve towards multi-party politics. It's sort of happening through the formation of blocs within both parties.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
5. This is true on many many issues
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:47 AM
Feb 2013

but particularly unions, as the party perceives that they are likely to go to the right based on cultural issues anyway. But basically the party looks at it's interests and says "Who else are you going to vote for?" and then does whatever they want.

Bryant

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
7. if the unions have the courage to vote on issues and not parties maybe more individuals will too
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 12:04 PM
Feb 2013

Sooner or later the "who else will you vote for?" line will not work anymore. Apparently it's already not working anymore for the labor unions.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
10. The answer is always "Just get us through the next election with your money and your volunteers,
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 12:18 PM
Feb 2013

and then we'll show you!"

theKed

(1,235 posts)
11. How long until
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 12:20 PM
Feb 2013

Unions decide backing indifferent politicians get them nowhere - and take that half-a-billion in contributions to field their own candidates? The further right the Dems slip, the bigger a vqccuum on the left they can fill

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For too long organized la...