General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFor too long organized labor has failed to ask the Dems, ‘Which side are you on?’
from In These Times:
Time for Democrats to Pay Their Dues
For too long organized labor has failed to ask the Dems, Which side are you on?
BY James Thindwa
The swift passage of Michigans so-called right-to-work legislation in December cemented a stark reality for labor: U.S. workers have been left without a national political party to champion their interests. Many local Democratic leadersand a few members of Congressstill join the struggle for union rights, but aside from union-friendly rhetoric deployed around election time, the national party is disengaged.
The fact is, the success of the American labor movement has always depended upon a welcoming policy environment facilitated by an allied political party. While many forces are contributing to labors decline, we can no longer ignore a central one: The once-reliable Democratic Party has abandoned the cause. However, the party remains heavily dependent on labor for financial and organizational infrastructure. The Center for Responsive Politics reports that unions spent $1.1 billion between 2005 and 2011 supporting federal candidates for office. In 2008 alone, according to the New York Times, labor laid out $450 million to elect Barack Obama. If the state-by-state GOP war against unions is aimed at a primary source of electoral support for its opponent, why hasnt that galvanized Democrats?
Indeed, Democrats have had ample opportunities to uphold workers rights. Unprecedented income inequality; attacks on labor in Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan; and a low-wage business model that saps the wealth of workers and communities provide a natural pivot for Democrats to push a pro-labor agenda. But there have been no takers, in Congress or the White House.
Congressional Democrats have failed to revive the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) to liberate the 60 million workers who want to join unions. And not one Democrat in Congress sponsored a resolution repudiating the GOPs attack on unions in Wisconsin and Michigan. .............................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/14445/time_for_democrats_to_pay_their_dues/
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Well, I dont know about you, but Ive had a snootful of that shit!
When it comes to politics, were looking for real champions of working women and men. And I have a message for some of our friends. It doesnt matter if candidates and parties are controlling the wrecking ball or simply standing asidethe outcome is the same either way, he explained. If leaders arent blocking the wrecking ball and advancing working families interests, working people will not support them. This is where our focus will benow, in 2012 and beyond.
http://my.firedoglake.com/wendydavis/2011/06/08/trumka-has-had-%E2%80%98a-snootful-of-that-shit%E2%80%99/
I think Trumka would be an awesome Secretary of Labor.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Maybe if they started withholding their support politicians would notice.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)It is mostly a coalition of consumerism, environmentalism, civil rights, public employee interests, and urban real estate interests.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)and get the vote out. It would hurt if the labor unions started pulling their support.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)As the OP says, they get nothing back from the Party.
The public employee unions aren't going anywhere.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)The industrial unions may have felt it first, but the republicans and corporations are attacking every public institution we have. It won't be long before the public employees feel it too, and if the democratic politicians won't fight privatization then the public employees will have to make a decision as well.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)I wouldn't be surprised to see the US evolve towards multi-party politics. It's sort of happening through the formation of blocs within both parties.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)but particularly unions, as the party perceives that they are likely to go to the right based on cultural issues anyway. But basically the party looks at it's interests and says "Who else are you going to vote for?" and then does whatever they want.
Bryant
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Sooner or later the "who else will you vote for?" line will not work anymore. Apparently it's already not working anymore for the labor unions.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)and then we'll show you!"
theKed
(1,235 posts)Unions decide backing indifferent politicians get them nowhere - and take that half-a-billion in contributions to field their own candidates? The further right the Dems slip, the bigger a vqccuum on the left they can fill