General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHead of UN Inquiry Into Drone Strikes and Targeted Killings Backs Brennan for Top CIA Job
from Spencer Ackerman at Wired: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/un-drone-brennan/
John Brennan, right, gives President Obama a security briefing in Massachusetts, Aug. 2011. Photo: Flickr/White House
The head of the United Nations inquiry into drone strikes and targeted killings (Ben Emmerson, the United Nations special rapporteur for human rights and counterterrorism) believes the chief architect of those efforts will rein them in at the CIA.---
Ben Emmerson, the United Nations special rapporteur for human rights and counterterrorism, tells Danger Room hes giving his qualified backing to John Brennan, President Obamas top counterterrorism adviser and nominee to become CIA director. The endorsement comes at a critical time for both men: Brennan faces Senate questioning on Thursday afternoon, and Emmerson is negotiating access with the U.S. government to its targeted-killing efforts for his recently announced international inquiry into their legality.
Its an unlikely endorsement. Emmerson, a British lawyer, has put the U.S. on notice that he wont hesitate to investigate U.S. war crimes if he uncovers evidence of them. While Emmersons inquiry wont focus on individuals responsible for any uncovered abuses, Brennan, as a White House aide, presided over the bureaucratic process for ordering suspected terrorists killed. Yet at the White House, Emmerson says, Brennan had the job of reining in the more extreme positions advanced by the CIA, which he thinks augurs well for Brennans CIA tenure.
By putting Brennan in direct control of the CIAs policy of targeted killings, the president has placed this mediating legal presence in direct control of the positions that the CIA will adopt and advance, so as to bring the CIA much more closely under direct presidential and democratic control, Emmerson says. Its right to view this as a recognition of the repository of trust that Obama places in Brennan to put him in control of the organization that poses the greatest threat to international legal consensus and recognition of the lawfulness of the drone program.
Warts and all conversations with current and former Obama administration officials convince Emmerson that Brennan tried to steer the drone program from a technology-driven process to one that attempted to balance the interests of the law, counterterrorism, and the agencies involved in implementing it. There are significant elements within the CIA who are unhappy about Brennans appointment, Emmerson says. These are the hawkish elements inside the CIA who would rather have as a director someone who reflected their agenda, rather than someone who is there to impose the presidents agenda.
Emmerson says he cant know if Brennan will actually carry out fewer drone strikes at the CIA. What Im saying is, Brennan has been the driving force for the imposition of a single consistent and coherent analysis, both legal and operational, as to the way the administration will pursue this program, he explains. Im not suggesting that I agree with that analysis. Thats not a matter for me, its a matter for states, and theres a very considerable disagreement about that. But what I am saying is that what he will impose is restraint over the wilder ambitions of the agencys hawks to treat this program in a manner that is ultimately unaccountable and secret.
read: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/un-drone-brennan/
related:
U.N. Drone Investigator: If Facts Lead to U.S. War Crimes, So Be It
http://contextly.com/redirect/?id=YqhWhwKNQ9:102508 7
Robb
(39,665 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)hopefully Emmerson is right and Bolton was mistaken about Brennan.
bigtree
(85,996 posts). . . and there are the hapless saps in the middle of it all, working in the meantime, to manage the madness.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts). . . so you'll wait, instead, for the results of the DU inquiry and investigation, then?
bobduca
(1,763 posts)Brennan certainly seems more than willing to execute the current administrations dystopian foreign policy.