General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn Brennan and the "So-Called" Americans
Amy Davidson
One of the problems is, once the drone program is so public, and one American is caught up, people dont know much about this one American citizenso called, said Senator Dianne Feinstein, in her questioning of John Brennan, President Obamas nominee for C.I.A. director, on Thursday. (John Cassidy has more on the hearing.) She was referring to Anwar al-Awlaki, who was killed by a drone strike in Yemen, in 2011, and was a so-called American because he was an American, born in New Mexico. They dont know what hes been doing, Feinstein continued. They dont know the incitement he has stirred up. I wonder if you could tell us a little bit about Mr. Awlaki and what hes been doing.
Brennan demurred at first, since the question was about an operation. Feinstein jumped in:
BRENNAN: Yes.
FEINSTEIN: And maybe you cannot discuss it here, but Ive read enough to know that he was a real problem.
Brennan agreed, saying that al-Awlaki was intimately involved in activities that were designed to kill innocent men, women, and children, mostly Americans. He was not just a propagandist. (He neglected to mention that al-Awlakis American teen-age son was also killed, in a separate strike.) Feinstein then led him through a number of incidents; in some cases, Brennan agreed that al-Awlaki was an organizer, and in others he spoke obliquely about inspiring and inciting individuals. Feinstein summed up the exchange with what may of been the most disturbing line in the three-hour hearing, worse, even, than the waterboarding joke that Senator Burr told a few minutes later:
And, so, Mr. Awlaki is not an American citizen by where anyone in America would be proud.
Proud, upstanding, so-called Americanis this the basis on which the Senate is judging fundamental questions of American rights and due process? Before the hearing, I wondered what picture of Americans we were supposed to have when we heard about the executive giving itself the power to kill them. Feinstein could hardly have given a less reassuring answer. When and on what basis will any of us get a so-called in front of our nationality? That there may have been a good deal of evidence against al-Awlaki is why his case should have gone before a court, not why it shouldnt have. What happened to the idea that it is precisely when we are the most enraged, and the least popular, that we need to be the most careful?
Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/02/john-brennans-cia-director-hearings-and-the-so-called-americans.html#ixzz2KKU4ViNg