Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 11:55 PM Feb 2013

Art critic thinks George W. Bush is a ‘good painter’

[IMG][/IMG]

The U.S. Secret Service has launched a formal investigation into who is behind the hacking and publishing of personal Bush family emails. But for former President George W. Bush, there may be an upside to the embarrassing leak: At least one major art critic likes the self-portraits Bush has been painting.

Photos of three of Bush's paintings were among the items hacked, including two self-portraits of the former president—one of him peering in a mirror in the shower, the other of his knobby knees and feet in a bathtub filling with water.

Unsurprisingly, Bush’s artwork immediately became blog fodder. Gawker called the paintings “just as awkward and simple as you’d hope." BlackBook wondered if the former president depicting himself in the bathroom meant that he was “trying to wash himself clean of the long failure that was his life.” The Guardian suggested Bush’s art might generate empathy among those who also have stared at their feet in the tub while contemplating life.

But Jerry Saltz, an art critic at New York Magazine, offered a more surprising take. In a piece published on Vulture, the magazine’s culture blog, Saltz declared Bush to to be a “good painter”—an assessment that even he seemed surprised by.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/art-critic-thinks-george-w-bush-good-painter-204613457--politics.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Bumblebee

(3,446 posts)
13. The dog was a cliche, like he came from a postcard
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 01:27 AM
Feb 2013

but the bathroom ones are unexpectedly refreshing and indeed quite good for an amateur. Does not make one respect him more as a former president but does make one realize there may be more angles to his personality than the caricature we all adhere to (for obvious and legitimate reasons). I was actually disturbed that I found myself liking the bathroom paintings.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
2. Oh if he loves those then he should take a gander at Paul Bremer's paintings.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 11:58 PM
Feb 2013

They are a bit less primitive, but not by much and he doesn't seem obsessed by bathrooms.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
8. Thanks. I would not be surprised if we learn more about the new artist, lol.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:10 AM
Feb 2013

This is fun stuff:

But Saltz also raves about Bush’s art, declaring that he “loves the bather portraits”:

"The reclusion and seclusiveness of the pictures evoke the quietude (though not the insight, quality, or genius) of certain Chardin still lifes. These are pictures of someone dissembling without knowing it, unprotected and on display, but split between the promptings of his own inner drives and limited by his abilities. They reflect the pleasures of disinterestedness. A floater. Inert. The images of a man who saw the entire world from the inside but who finds the smallest, most private place in a private home to imagine his universe. Of almost nothingness. Sweet, sublime, oblique oblivion. The visibility of invisibleness.

Concluding, Saltz urges Bush to “paint more. Please.” And he suggests—seriously, we think—that the Whitney Museum of American Art “get on the stick and offer this American a show.”

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,732 posts)
7. I thought the paintings were pretty good, too.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:08 AM
Feb 2013

Now if only he'd started painting many years ago and gotten really good at it, maybe he could have made a decent career as an artist instead of becoming a politician and a shitty president. Interestingly, Hitler was a fairly good painter, too, but he wasn't quite good enough to get into art school so he became an evil despot.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
16. He needs to really learn drawing.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:07 AM
Feb 2013

Brushwork is decent in areas, with some surprising color choices in a few places for an amateur. But the underlying bones look weak, not the naïf of a practiced artist who has honed powers of seeing and drawing.

Bad drawing is my pet peeve.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
17. I think his style is tortured. And perhaps that is appropriate.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:10 AM
Feb 2013

I don't think his shit is any good, to be blunt.

It has value because it was done by a famous person, but if the same stuff was done by some poor no-name in a locked ward, it wouldn't get a second of interest or respect.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Art critic thinks George ...