like there is no such thing collateral damage..

if you will, of whether it is worth it to kill the targets. When we don't have to risk ANYone, why not just call a kill on whatever we want because we have no risk ourselves.

That's my worry.

Including some of our perpetual foot stompers down thread.

... due process, huh?

Fuck the Constitution, right pal?

I mean what's the worst that could happen?

Some of the Constitution is a load of crap...

... one of these to know it's there?

1) we are invading other countries we are not at war with - what if they feel they can do the same? It is like, why would you torture enemy combatants but say your enemies have no right to torture your soldiers - what is good for the goose......
2) who is overseeing who these enemies are? What if it starts being a union organizer? would you really rely on Dick Cheney or Romney to decide who an enemy is?
3) It is violating the constitution of the US, where citizens have rights to a trial to face their accusers. Remember how the information of someone who wanted a reward kept a boy in Guantanamo since hw was 11 and he was water boarded as a child? People lie, and the government is going on the word of people.
4) it keeps us one step further away from the wars we are engaged in, so that people are just statistics - remember the Star Trek, where 2 countries were at virtual war for 500 years, when it said an area was hit, the people had a week to get their things in order and then go to suicide machines, very clean without hurting the art or discomforting the people who were not hit. No messy injuries to remind you. The wars we fight currently are not on our lands and only discomfort the soldiers we send there and then they come back here , where no one understands. Wars should be ugly and painful and generally not be something we want to engage in.

terrorist depends on your perspective. there are many people who think the USA is a terrorist as well so they would like to drone us into oblivion as well

Object Lesson