Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:39 PM Feb 2013

I just want to make sure I'm following this

We're being told that Dorner is bringing the disinfectant of sunlight to the abuses and corruption of the LAPD. He has single-handedly turned the system on its ear striking panic into the hearts of the nameless, faceless power structure that for too long has not been held to account (Where the hell is the mayor, if I may ask?). He has gone Rambo, showing us how the power of the law suppresses us.

The police are corrupt. The police are brutal. The police are outside the law. The police are abusive. The police are out of control.

The police are nothing more than a state sanctioned criminal gang used by the Powers That Be to crush dissent and serve as the fist within their iron gauntlet of oppression.

---

But any Teabagger who says he needs a gun to defend himself from criminals is absurd because only cops need guns; and any Teabagger who says the 2nd Amendment is to draw a line against a rogue domestic government is just some paranoid fantacist.

BTW -- Dorner is pro-gun control -- or maybe he just doesn't like victims who have even odds.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I just want to make sure I'm following this (Original Post) Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2013 OP
The only thing worse than armed idiots with badges are armed idiots without them. Robb Feb 2013 #1
More badges. GeorgeGist Feb 2013 #7
The ones you like least face court trials evidence, prosecution and face prison Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2013 #17
That's the logic of those who live in n ex-post world Dreamer Tatum Feb 2013 #2
I'm not sure I'm following this. JaneyVee Feb 2013 #3
Definitely not Dorner. Apparently he's the brutality in LAPD so many pretend to rail against Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2013 #6
Ok I get it now. Yeah, the violence is indefensible, and it's a shame because he could have JaneyVee Feb 2013 #14
Read this a few times and still not sure the point you are trying to make libtodeath Feb 2013 #4
Couldn't you address that in the post you are referencing? RandiFan1290 Feb 2013 #5
The fact that he used to be on the police force is certainly telling. liberalmuse Feb 2013 #8
But but but... He Shoots Truth to Power! n/t cherokeeprogressive Feb 2013 #9
And he's doing it so young people can grow up in a better world Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2013 #11
How "Orwellian" of you! patrice Feb 2013 #15
= FOUR fingers!!! patrice Feb 2013 #16
If one person held those two opinions, I'd shrug. Brickbat Feb 2013 #10
But how can someone claim the PTB are a manifest threat Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2013 #13
How is having a gun going to defend you from the police? Fumesucker Feb 2013 #18
The police, because they are a collective entity, are subject to OUR evaluation of them. Freelance patrice Feb 2013 #12
Once again, who seriously wants to take away weapons ...... Bonhomme Richard Feb 2013 #19

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
17. The ones you like least face court trials evidence, prosecution and face prison
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:36 PM
Feb 2013

if found to not have a justifiable reason. The ones you prefer have internal investigations away from the public and are represented by professional associations.

It seems an odd set of priorities.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
2. That's the logic of those who live in n ex-post world
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:41 PM
Feb 2013

Those of us for whom life is preferable to self-righteous indignation prefer not to be unilaterally disarmed.

Nice post.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
6. Definitely not Dorner. Apparently he's the brutality in LAPD so many pretend to rail against
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:50 PM
Feb 2013

But I'm surprised that those who support Dorner can also pretend to be anti-2nd Amendment. Apparently they don't mind *him* using guns to resist Da Man.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
14. Ok I get it now. Yeah, the violence is indefensible, and it's a shame because he could have
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 07:12 PM
Feb 2013

probably done more damage to the LAPD without violence and instead taking his manifesto to the media, news circuits, (even Hollywood for $$$) than he can with violence.

RandiFan1290

(6,237 posts)
5. Couldn't you address that in the post you are referencing?
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:49 PM
Feb 2013

Does everyone need to make their own vanity post on this subject?

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
8. The fact that he used to be on the police force is certainly telling.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 07:03 PM
Feb 2013

It makes me wonder what kind of personality seeks out that kind of power - to be a police officer. The fact that he purports to be free of blame, yet was able to gun down people in cold blood is telling. The fact that the LAPD has been shooting first and asking questions later is also very telling. The whole system is completely fucked up, yet we sit on our asses as spectators.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
11. And he's doing it so young people can grow up in a better world
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 07:09 PM
Feb 2013

unless they happen to be the young people wholly unresponsible for his grievances who he shot down in cold-blooded murder in order to decry police brutality -- kinda like the kind where an ex-cop imagines himself above the law and guns down young people wholly unresponsible for his greivances.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
10. If one person held those two opinions, I'd shrug.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 07:07 PM
Feb 2013

The fact that you can find both of those opinions on a message board full of posts from lots of people make me shrug as well. Maybe with one shoulder, instead of two.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
13. But how can someone claim the PTB are a manifest threat
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 07:12 PM
Feb 2013

and then condemn those who would defend themselves from such a threat. At best the complainers seem to admit they accept their rank as mere sheeple.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
12. The police, because they are a collective entity, are subject to OUR evaluation of them. Freelance
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 07:11 PM
Feb 2013

V-for-Vendetta types are not and they assume that their principles give them the PRIVILEGE of instigating trouble and violence WITHOUT ASKING ANYONE ELSE if s/he wishes to exercise their rights to make individual CHOICES in the matter.

Meet the "new" boss, SAME as the old boss.

Anyone who says it isn't, and has not ALWAYS been, and very likely will never be anything but "the lesser of two bads" is a liar. Give me the one I know and have at least theoretical influence over to make things better, over the one I don't know, and whose "friends" and associates I don't know either, and who all are pretending that the things that we don't know about them or what they propose for "our" future don't matter.

Bonhomme Richard

(9,000 posts)
19. Once again, who seriously wants to take away weapons ......
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:56 PM
Feb 2013

Leaving homeowners defenseless against criminals. Defenseless against a platoon attacking their house, maybe yes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I just want to make sure ...