Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lindsay Graham is a DANGER TO NATIONAL SECURITY! (Original Post) annabanana Feb 2013 OP
The whole GOP is a danger to national security. nt valerief Feb 2013 #1
and economic security malaise Feb 2013 #2
As Republicans proved with their massive, stupid, AWOL derelict Epic FAIL on 9/11 Berlum Feb 2013 #3
+1 valerief Feb 2013 #4
Let them never be allowed to forget this! burnsei sensei Feb 2013 #18
+1 burnsei sensei Feb 2013 #19
x1000 libtodeath Feb 2013 #7
We'd all be better off if Graham The Wizard Feb 2013 #5
Never heard of this (but I'd love to!) Do you have a link ?? AAO Feb 2013 #15
No link The Wizard Feb 2013 #22
Benghazi is driving the Republicans and their "base" barking, foaming mad Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2013 #6
I gave you a heart just for that post. LisaLynne Feb 2013 #8
Republican 'leadership' goes AWOL on 9/11 - America gets hit Berlum Feb 2013 #10
Excellent post! Poiuyt Feb 2013 #12
The State Department Was Focused On What Was Happening In Egypt DallasNE Feb 2013 #17
This asshole lillypaddle Feb 2013 #9
I suspect we can go on killing people just fine without a Secretary of Defense el_bryanto Feb 2013 #11
you hit the nail on the head bigtree Feb 2013 #13
graham is a political piece of shit. worthless. spanone Feb 2013 #14
Remember Lindsey Graham and the great blow job that was White Water? Botany Feb 2013 #16
So who does he represent? burnsei sensei Feb 2013 #20
Graham's an asshole, but we're not going to be without a secretary of defense onenote Feb 2013 #21

The Wizard

(12,546 posts)
5. We'd all be better off if Graham
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 08:39 AM
Feb 2013

went back to looking for "companions" in public toilets. He only tells people he likes hanging out in public toilets for the aroma.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,426 posts)
6. Benghazi is driving the Republicans and their "base" barking, foaming mad
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:35 AM
Feb 2013

Last edited Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:00 PM - Edit history (1)

The death of 4 American diplomats was a tragedy and Congress has a proper role in investigating what happened and how such tragedies can be prevented in the future (i.e. not cutting spending for security at embassies/consulates) but some Republicans like Graham, McCain, et. al are acting as though 3000 American citizens died here on American soil and the President of the United States of America and his national security team had received an intelligence briefing nearly a month before indicating that something wicked was this way coming. I don't remember any members of the "Benghazi Brigade" attacking President George W. Bush and demanding the kind of accountability and scrutiny over 9/11/01 that they are demanding of President Obama over the events of 09/11/12. What's even more surprising (or depressing depending on your point of view) is that McCain, Graham, et. al have apparently been spending more time holding press conferences attacking would-be Presidential nominees for various critical agencies and grandstanding than actually attending briefings that have been held on what exactly happened in Benghazi, where they might, you know, get some of those "answers" that they keep demanding.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
17. The State Department Was Focused On What Was Happening In Egypt
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 10:25 AM
Feb 2013

What happened in Benghazi was more like a car bombing. The 4 people died not directly from the attack but from the smoke when the building caught fire and there was no fire exit in the building. That's right, the building was a death trap.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
11. I suspect we can go on killing people just fine without a Secretary of Defense
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:59 AM
Feb 2013

But I suppose I'm not an expert.

Bryant

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
13. you hit the nail on the head
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 10:02 AM
Feb 2013

How can anyone take his concerns about security seriously when he's holding up these nominations for defense and intelligence?

Botany

(70,551 posts)
16. Remember Lindsey Graham and the great blow job that was White Water?
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 10:25 AM
Feb 2013


This is exactly what he is trying to do with this hissy fit over Benghazi.
The Head of the CIA, The Sec. of State, and lots of other people have
already testified in front of the committee he is on. Now he might not like
the answers he got but he really needs to shut up or come out and admit
he is on a fishing exhibition in order to try to hurt the President.

onenote

(42,737 posts)
21. Graham's an asshole, but we're not going to be without a secretary of defense
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:50 PM
Feb 2013

Panetta has said he would stay on board until his successor is confirmed. Even if he got tired of waiting, the President would simply name an acting Secretary of Defense (as has been done in the past). Its not "treason" to block the confirmation of the president's first choice for Secretary of Defense (even though its something that should not be done lightly).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lindsay Graham is a DANGE...