Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:42 PM Feb 2013

Right-Wing Related Question

Can someone here tell me exactly what policies the Right offers that are actually more beneficial to the country as a whole? I could be wrong, but so far, all I have seen from their side of the spectrum are stances in favor of the elite at the expense of everyone else. They have opposed the auto bailout, the troop withdrawal, women's right to choose, same-sex marriage, secularism, progressive taxes, public sector job growth, unions, entitlements, and their side believes that global warming is nonexistent. Furthermore, while job growth was at about 24M under Republican presidents the past few decades, job growth under Democratic presidents has been about 42M, plus the deficit is shrinking under our current administration.
Much of the media makes it out as if both sides of the spectrum are equally valid, but I have yet to see the other side be correct on ANY major issue thus far. I understand that there is a need for a functional 2-party system, but what do Republicans (and the Right-wing in general) have to offer the country besides impediments to progressivism?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
3. Bookmarked this when I saw it.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 04:53 PM
Feb 2013

I just had to know what you'd come back with! Now I'm wondering if the absence of further comment is in fact your comment...

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
7. Oh, no, that was a good thing, as I'd nearly lost it in the pile while changing things on my iMac.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 06:06 PM
Feb 2013

It was big drama, even called up Apple. For some reason they've reduced the price of a one month support plan to about a third, which was nice.

Did you hear the announcement last night at the SOTU by Obama that Apple is moving production back to the USA?

Last year Obama was reported to have talked to Steve Jobs before he died, asking him what Obama could to do get them to move manufacturing back here. But the response back then was that they couldn't.

Because of long-term contracts, was my guess. I'd heard rumors late last year it was happening, but now it's official. So Obama didn't quit working behind the scenes and he probably won't get any more credit for this than any of the other jobs he's brought back.

Obama's work on building education and bringing good paying manufacturing back is paying off. And the new CEO of Apple, Tim Cook was invited to the WH fiscal cliff talks and also to the SOTU:



Tim Cook: Steve Jobs told me to 'just do what's right'

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57557495-37/tim-cook-steve-jobs-told-me-to-just-do-whats-right/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014396449

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
9. Yes and I'm glad of it.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 06:25 PM
Feb 2013

It's frustrating how many people have been willing to write off/discard American manufacturing. I've read and heard people saying things like "those jobs aren't coming back." A significant counter-example is useful and most welcome.

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
2. I'll have a crack at it
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 04:16 PM
Feb 2013

I used to be a republican when I was younger with less life experience, and I can sum it up in a reasonably condensed manner.

Basically they push the notion of: What's good for capital ( businesses or monied people ) is good for you. Supply side bullshit. Now if large swaths of people have come to find empirical evidence to the contrary ( or never bought the theory from the outset ) then they push the idea of solidarity of culture: "God & Guns" and other social issues, all coagulated around some notion of "rugged individualism".

That's pretty much it.

libtodeath

(2,888 posts)
5. None,they pander to fear,hatred and bigotry to enrich a small hand full.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 05:09 PM
Feb 2013

people get drawn in to that thinking if only we would stop giving stuff to some there would be so much for them instead.
That is why they always vote against what is best for them because they refuse to believe that what is best for all is really going to help them.
They rather it be dog eat dog.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
8. They offer authoritarianism with its freedom from uncertainty
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 06:09 PM
Feb 2013

If everyone does what is predictable, you can control your environment - if you are a white man. Many white women will think they get secondary benefit from this.

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
10. Shoot, even a lot of white men are in the questionable secondary benefit category.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 07:29 PM
Feb 2013

But as long as there's someone else to beat up on...


treestar

(82,383 posts)
11. This is true, too
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:11 PM
Feb 2013

And there are conservatives of other races, so maybe that comment was too broad. It's the certainty of everyone being "in their place" and adhering to customs, religion, and the predictability that can seem to create.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Right-Wing Related Questi...