Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama’s ambitious second term agenda intensifies GOP’s dilemma
The Morning Plum: Obamas ambitious second term agenda intensifies GOPs dilemma
Posted by Greg Sargent
In his State of the Union speech yesterday, President Obama laid out an ambitious vision for where he wants to take the country. He offered a way out of our economic doldrums investment in the countrys future as an alternative to more crippling austerity. He proposed taking action to fix the broken immigration system, address the climate change that threatens our future, reform voting irregularities, staunch the ongoing gun slaughter of tends of thousands of Americans each year, and help millions struggling to enter the middle class, via a minimum wage hike, universal pre-school, and other proposals.
Many of these ideas have broad support. Obamas speech represented an effort to solve an array of problems that the American people appear to want solved...Republicans face a choice. Either they can accept the realities of public opinion and become a functional opposition party, by working with Obama and Democrats to get some of what they want while allowing Obama to claim some victories of his own, as unbearable a prospect as that might seem. This is what Newt Gingrich eventually did in the 1990s. Or they can continue to reflexively obstruct everything, with an eye towards well, its not clear what this would accomplish, except kicking the can down the road in hopes of taking back the Senate in 2014, making it even easier to tie up Obamas agenda in advance of another grab at the White House in 2016.
Given the current state of the GOP brand and the shifting demographic realities that suggest the Democratic coalition is ascendant, while the Republican one is shrinking is this really a long term gamble Republicans are prepared to take? The proposals Obama laid out yesterday are likely to continue cementing the degree to which core growing constituencies Latinos; young voters; college educated whites, especially women; and even to some extent non-college white women identify with the Democratic Party. Reflexive GOP opposition to all these things could exacerbate the partys estrangement from these groups.
Yesterdays rebuttal by Marco Rubio was not encouraging. He rehashed many of the same old anti-government bromides that were soundly defeated in the 2012 election. As Steve Benen notes, the speech suggested that that Republicans are absolutely convinced that there are no substantive lessons to be learned from their 2012 defeats. Rubios primary statement outlining the GOP vision for governments role in peoples lives amounted to this: It plays a crucial part in keeping us safe, enforcing rules, and providing some security against the risks of modern life. This isnt an affirmative vision. Its a grudging concession.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/02/13/the-morning-plum-obamas-ambitious-second-term-agenda-intensifies-gops-dilemma/
Posted by Greg Sargent
In his State of the Union speech yesterday, President Obama laid out an ambitious vision for where he wants to take the country. He offered a way out of our economic doldrums investment in the countrys future as an alternative to more crippling austerity. He proposed taking action to fix the broken immigration system, address the climate change that threatens our future, reform voting irregularities, staunch the ongoing gun slaughter of tends of thousands of Americans each year, and help millions struggling to enter the middle class, via a minimum wage hike, universal pre-school, and other proposals.
Many of these ideas have broad support. Obamas speech represented an effort to solve an array of problems that the American people appear to want solved...Republicans face a choice. Either they can accept the realities of public opinion and become a functional opposition party, by working with Obama and Democrats to get some of what they want while allowing Obama to claim some victories of his own, as unbearable a prospect as that might seem. This is what Newt Gingrich eventually did in the 1990s. Or they can continue to reflexively obstruct everything, with an eye towards well, its not clear what this would accomplish, except kicking the can down the road in hopes of taking back the Senate in 2014, making it even easier to tie up Obamas agenda in advance of another grab at the White House in 2016.
Given the current state of the GOP brand and the shifting demographic realities that suggest the Democratic coalition is ascendant, while the Republican one is shrinking is this really a long term gamble Republicans are prepared to take? The proposals Obama laid out yesterday are likely to continue cementing the degree to which core growing constituencies Latinos; young voters; college educated whites, especially women; and even to some extent non-college white women identify with the Democratic Party. Reflexive GOP opposition to all these things could exacerbate the partys estrangement from these groups.
Yesterdays rebuttal by Marco Rubio was not encouraging. He rehashed many of the same old anti-government bromides that were soundly defeated in the 2012 election. As Steve Benen notes, the speech suggested that that Republicans are absolutely convinced that there are no substantive lessons to be learned from their 2012 defeats. Rubios primary statement outlining the GOP vision for governments role in peoples lives amounted to this: It plays a crucial part in keeping us safe, enforcing rules, and providing some security against the risks of modern life. This isnt an affirmative vision. Its a grudging concession.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/02/13/the-morning-plum-obamas-ambitious-second-term-agenda-intensifies-gops-dilemma/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 690 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama’s ambitious second term agenda intensifies GOP’s dilemma (Original Post)
ProSense
Feb 2013
OP
ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. Top Republicans Oppose Obama’s Call To Raise The Minimum Wage
Top Republicans Oppose Obamas Call To Raise The Minimum Wage
By Pat Garofalo
During his State of the Union address last night, President Obama called for raising the minimum wage to $9 an hour, up from its current $7.25, and indexing it to inflation so that it rises as the economy grows. If the increase were to happen, it would give the minimum wage its highest purchasing power since 1981, lifting millions of families above the poverty line.
But top Republicans are already coming out against it. During interviews last night and today, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) both made clear that they oppose raising the minimum wage, citing its supposed effect on job creation:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/13/1587381/top-republicans-oppose-minimum-wage/
By Pat Garofalo
During his State of the Union address last night, President Obama called for raising the minimum wage to $9 an hour, up from its current $7.25, and indexing it to inflation so that it rises as the economy grows. If the increase were to happen, it would give the minimum wage its highest purchasing power since 1981, lifting millions of families above the poverty line.
But top Republicans are already coming out against it. During interviews last night and today, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) both made clear that they oppose raising the minimum wage, citing its supposed effect on job creation:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/13/1587381/top-republicans-oppose-minimum-wage/
Marco Polo Rubio is racking them up: denies climate change, votes against VAWA and opposes raising the minimum wage.