General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoesn't anybody else think that the water-drinking wasn't funny and all the fuss about it is stupid?
You just knew as it was happening that it would be an SNL skit, but they're often not funny these days. That this is the main focus of the media instead of Rubio's (in my view tired) talking points is typical and infantile, and were he a Dem people here would be saying so...
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)the get-go, the slide down for the water bottle and the expression on his face confirmed. He's a doofus child in a grown-up world.
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)but the insane priorities of the media often hurt the Democrats
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)It isn't as if what he had to say was a complete surprise. They are the same damn talking points which get hashed out all the time.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)as I was about to shut down my laptop I noticed your
hair on fire character running back and forth, and
wondered if that keeps happening even when my
computer goes to sleep.. and .. now my computer
can't get back to sleep for wondering about it.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Tell your computer that my little hair afire guy does keep running back and forth no matter what.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Paladin
(28,269 posts)Howard Dean's presidential efforts were ended by one spirited holler. Why should we cut the Repubs any slack for Rubio's goofy, flop sweaty, water-reaching performance?
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)and two wrongs don't make a right...
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Thanks for your insight
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)Paladin
(28,269 posts)That whole "two wrongs don't make a right" thing hasn't worked for me in a long time, not in the context of competitive politics. If we are unwilling to get down in the muck and fight our political foes, we basically deserve what we get. The right wing in this country relies upon and takes continuous advantage of liberals who refuse to "get down on their level," because "two wrongs don't make a right." The stakes are simply too high for us to restrain ourselves on the basis of play-nice rules which were discarded years ago by our opponents. If you are not willing to fight hard and dirty for what you believe in, then stand aside and let the rest of us do what needs to be done.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Paladin
(28,269 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)I have no compunctions against tearing Rubio down - he brought this on himself.
It's not our fault he didn't adequately prepare, try making his speech in front of a mirror, have a speaking coach give him some advice like "Don't drink your water in the middle of a speech."
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"and two wrongs don't make a right..." but yet we "fight fire with fire"
Hard to know what to do when surrounded by two contrasting bumper-stickers both pretending to be valid thought.
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)and also the second UP TO A POINT. What's your "valid thought"?
Response to HomerRamone (Reply #49)
HangOnKids This message was self-deleted by its author.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)My only valid thought is that it's difficult to take bumper-stickers seriously, as with those who choose to use them, and rationalize them as actual thought.
...up to a point, you see.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)Better to focus on the stupid and hypocritical things he said.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I take a medication that makes me thirsty. I always have water with me. Especially when I speak publicly. It's a ridiculous controversy.
LeftInTX
(25,479 posts)But I still think it's funny. It was the way it was executed. The water was out of reach. He knows it's going to be awkward, he doesn't know how to execute this eloquently. It ends up looking like something out of a cheesy stand up routine.
His mouth was very dry by the way. That part wasn't funny.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Any chance to make fun of them is great. Any chance to derail Rubio is great.
This isn't a tea party. It's a war with victims (mainly poor and women).
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)What to do on Television, obviously. Those who run the Republican party, haven't a clue, about how to behave on TV. Reaching nearly off camera for a bottle of water was a huge blunder, because it made him look awkward and unprofessional. Also, people will long forget the speech he made, but they will remember this moment.. Not because he needed a drink of water, but he had to go clear outside the box to get one. If you are going to drink, you have to look good doing it.
This all reminded me of something Chevy Chase would do, to get a few laughs, only with him, it would have been a full fall on his face kind of moment. Rubio didn't fall on his face, but as far as Television etiquette, he certainly did. It was unexpected, and not only that the expression in his face, was like the kid being caught grabbing cookies out of the cookie jar. HE KNEW he messed up! He knew it was awkward and I bet you it will never happen again.
Rubio: "Note to self, don't act foolish on TV" Lesson learned.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)joked immediately after that that was some Cary Grant move he made there for the drink of water:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2363351
And what he should have done instead:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2363566
It was fun too watching Twitter and the internet tubes light up faster than you can say "Rubio".
And let me take this opportunity, AsahinaKimi, to say how much I enjoy your posts. And that one with the blizzard pics the other was especially fun!
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)I was almost expecting him to do a full out Chevy Chase..and fall over the table reaching for it..That would have been classic.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)midwest irish
(155 posts)The good thing is that style matters. Jindal got blasted a few years ago when he looked awkward in that SOTU rebuttal. That ended his chances and he WAS the next big star. No one remembers the words said (try to think of one sentence uttered by Rubio) but people remember the style and what they saw. This was the problem with Obama's first debate (he looked sluggish). This was the problem with Nixon v Kennedy. This is what people will remember and it means the Republicans have one less tool in their tool kit.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)They have no tools but thanks for your ardent consideration. So happy you mentioned Obama looked sluggish, but he slugged the shit out of Romney didn't he?
midwest irish
(155 posts)Yeah, Obama destroyed Romney in the next two debates, thankfully. It was almost comical how bad Romney looked compared to the President. The consensus was that if you just listened to the first debate, Obama did well but those who watched it felt the other way. When Nixon debated Kennedy his gross, sweaty, jaundiced faced turned a lot of people away.
Although I dont think republicans have any possibilities to win nationally any time soon, I dont want to take any chances because of 2000 and 2004. Anytime they shoot themselves in the foot (the water drinking and face swatting of Rubio and their civil war with the tea party) it helps us out. Rubio will be remembered for messing up his big moment when he was to be formally revealed to the country. His awkward hand gestures and drinking is the legacy of that moment. Republicans now have to resort to plan B. This is a good thing.
livetohike
(22,156 posts)EC
(12,287 posts)do it because they are being insincere and the words are sticking in their throats. It happened to Paul Ryan at the debate too...remember him guzzling water?
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)He's getting talked about way more than if he hadn't taken his big gulp. Also, for me the moment signifies how unready for the world stage this particular politician is.
what in the world would anyone have to say about Rubio were it not for that moment?
I just watched it and didn't think it was that bad, but the water should have been closer to where he was speaking and maybe it should have been in a glass. Other than that, I got nothin'.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)"and were he a Dem people here would be saying so..."
Nice try, but, yet again, nope.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)And that's good if you're hoping that they become a permanent minority.
It doesn't matter if it was funny or not.
Sivart
(325 posts)Republicans have made fun of Obama for years for using a teleprompter knowing damn good and well that it standard practice.......So i see this drink of water business as more of the same.
It is stupid, and silly, and completely irrelevant in every way......
But this is who we are these days.
Not proud of it, but it is hard to deny....
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Smilo
(1,944 posts)it was his facial expression and movements. He looks like a kid caught doing something he shouldn't.
unblock
(52,285 posts)usually they reserve this kind of superficial, silly smear for democrats.
Raffi Ella
(4,465 posts)I thought it was SO funny. I laugh every time I think of it.
Besides, they're so irrelevant these days, who cares what he was saying? It was just more of the same crap that lost them the election in 2012. They're idiots and it seems they will continue to be. I think that point is coming across loud and clear in the media today. So why not enjoy the funny?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)The water's seven feet to your left, and you're on camera, live. Do you just work up some spit and deal with it, or do you hurl yourselv across the room for that bottle of water?
Rubio chose poorly.
That said, I don't think it's goofy enough to overshadow the SOTU.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)on Rubio's part, undermining his (and the GOP's) credibility.
But, yeah, too much is being made of it, imo.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)But there you go.
Marr
(20,317 posts)But I don't really see why it should be so hilarious, no.
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)The moment I saw that lurch to the water with his eyes on the camera, I knew he was dead meat. Something was transmitted through the airwaves that spoke louder than his pitiful lies. Lies such as still living in the same old neighborhood, poor thing. Yet he just put that house on the market for $650,000! He's a crook who lived off his campaign money, and moralizes with the best of the hypocrites. The look in his eyes as he went for the water bottle betrayed him more than words could do. Anyone who wasn't a hack would have said, "Excuse me," walked over to the water, taken a drink, and gone on. He made it way more than that. It was more that inelegant, more than awkward ... it was creepy.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)without a break.
There were also the weird hand gestures and the flopsweat.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think it was oddly funny, and I also think there hasn't really been much of a fuss...
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)He got thirsty. He drank. He was nervous.
So fucking what?
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Been laughing about it all day!
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)he grabbed for the water, he was wiping away spittle from the corners of his mouth.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)OK, back up: this morning the papers and the web are full of nuance-sniffing, as people try to find omens in the SOTU and the GOP response. I dont think I can add anything useful to all that. But there was one important point in Marco Rubios remarks that I dont think has been highlighted. Its true, as Andy Rosenthal says, that Rubio mainly reminded us that Republicans dont like government or taxes; surprise! But he also reminded us that Republicans dont like reality.
Heres the passage:
This idea that our problems were caused by a government that was too small its just not true. In fact, a major cause of our recent downturn was a housing crisis created by reckless government policies.
This really isnt about the GSEs, its about the BSEs the Blame Someone Else crowd. Faced with overwhelming, catastrophic evidence that their faith in unregulated financial markets was wrong, they have responded by rewriting history to defend their prejudices.
This strikes me as a bigger deal than whether Rubio slurped his water; he and his party are now committed to the belief that their pre-crisis doctrine was perfect, that there are no lessons from the worst financial crisis in three generations except that we should have even less regulation. And given another shot at power, theyll test that thesis by giving the bankers a chance to do it all over again.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/13/marco-rubio-has-learned-nothing/
djean111
(14,255 posts)So I will laugh at whatever I want to.
He is an opportunistic and entitled-feeling liar, and I think this water thing is lucky for him because it may humanize him to some.
But not to me, I live in Florida.
Rubio has ventured outside his Jeb-built bubble, and found that the world outside is as harsh and unforgiving to him as the GOP is towards the poor.
He will get lots more mileage out of this as he scurries around the media.
In my opinion, fussing about the fuss is misplaced.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)I admit, I finally watched it and it was pretty damn funny.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)That's how it is now.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Excessive fluids may or may not be the sign of something.
Maybe Rubio knows he isn't going to be on the national ticket, so maybe he wants to broaden his image to do a Sarah.
We have no idea.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Anything to make fun of repukes and show their "heroes" up to be completely incompetent dickheads is fine by me.
Plus the fucker lied constantly in his "speech".
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)that was funny
That said, I'm surprised it became as big a deal as it did. I guess in our age anything can become a "trending topic."
juajen
(8,515 posts)Yes, I laughed. It was really the look on his face as he was trying to sneak it. It should have been within easy reach of him, and he should have just taken a drink. He was thirsty. But, it certainly was funny. How could he think the camera was not on him at all times?
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)politician's personalities and personal quirks rather than their backers and their policies.
encourages people to view politics in terms of personalities and to attack people at a junior high school level -- because they wear funny shoes, have big noses, don't know not to drink water during speeches, and similar irrelevant stuff.