General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere's Something Fundamentally Wrong With The College Business Model
When I read academic literature, all too often by paragraph three I'm lost in a morass of quantitative analysis that is far beyond not only my abilities but those of almost every business person I've ever met. In my view, the authors devote far too much of their time conducting research and writing about it in articles that only their peers understand and too little time actually teaching. As a result, their students are getting progressively less for their money, a guarantee of future serious trouble for higher education. As someone said about the North Pole, when you're there, every direction is down. I happen to think the American university system is on top of the North Pole now and the sides are steep. One solution? Maybe it's time to give our customers, the students, a choice in what they actually want to pay for, and possibly scholarly research isn't it. The value of a free market is, after all, one of the things we teach.
Let me give you an example of the extent to which things are going wrong. A couple of years ago, a valued faculty member who was responsible for a prolific output of financial research at a well-known business school resigned. This caused great distress within the college, as the administration feared that the school's rankings would suffer because it would no longer be associated with his scholarship. But while he was the school's most successful scholar, he certainly didn't teach anything related to his research. How practical was that research anyway? I've worked in the financial area for 50 years and I didn't have a clue as to what his most recent articles were about -- and nor did various business colleagues to whom I showed them. If we couldn't decipher his writings, for whom were they intended? My answer: The community of scholars who write for one another but not for their students and certainly not for business executives who are interested in practical ideas that might actually work.
By way of a second example, a faculty member at another college told me how she was reproached by her co-author for getting behind on their book. She tried to explain her lateness by pointing out the demands of her rigorous teaching load. "Are you kidding me?" the co-author said. "How can you teach that much and still get your work done?" In other words, teaching wasn't her job; research and writing was.
http://www.businessinsider.com/universities-spend-too-much-on-research-2013-2
zazen
(2,978 posts)I get that the careerism of TT faculty and the restratification of the academy has led to a glut of arcane, pretty irrelevant essays and studies, but how to know which might lead to some amazing breakthrough in thinking and/or practice? And research _can_ improve teaching, and having students engage in research improves their learning.
There are a range of institutional types out there so that students don't have to attend research universities, public or private. There are public "master's level" institutions as well as community colleges where the TT faculty aren't expected to generate as much research and having higher teaching loads.
Neoliberalism is seeping into the academy in so many ways, including disempowering faculty governance and academic freedom in the name of cost savings to students. I agree that there is some waste in contemporary IHEs through administrative latticing and overcompensation of top administrators (along with too many renovations of recreation facilities to remain competitive in admissions), but cutting funds and lines for research isn't the solution. Increasing TT faculty lines instead of adjunctifying PhDs with 100k in debt is the best way to spread the research and teaching load. For every upper adm (who needs another associate dean of diversity affairs for EVERY special interest group!), one could hire three TT track humanities faculty who'd be a lot more helpful to those special populations where it counts. It'd be well worth it.