Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 11:02 AM Feb 2013

Obama Administration Asks Banks to Regulate Their Own Foreclosure Abuses

Having bungled the so-called independent review of foreclosure mistakes, the Obama administration has now decided that the best way to help homeowners is to have the banks—which were responsible for the foreclosure errors—examine the case files and decide how best to fix the situation.

In January, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) shut down the foreclosure review by independent consultants—which had already cost about $2 billion— after it was revealed that the banks had selected said consultants. The process also proved to be taking too long to resolve homeowner grievances, so the administration decided to reach a $3.6 billion settlement with the banks.

But before the money can be distributed to individuals wronged during the foreclosure crisis, more than four million cases need to be reviewed. Instead of federal regulators doing the work, they are trusting the financial institutions, including Bank of America and Wells Fargo, to do it properly this time.

Housing advocates, not surprisingly, are worried the banks will shortchange homeowners while they scrutinize their earlier mistakes. “The whole process has been a slap in the face to homeowners and a slap on the wrist to banks,” Isaac Simon Hodes, an organizer with Massachusetts-based Lynn United for Change, told The New York Times. “The latest development shows how there has been no accountability.”

http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/obama-administration-asks-banks-to-regulate-their-own-foreclosure-abuses-130215?news=847076

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Administration Asks Banks to Regulate Their Own Foreclosure Abuses (Original Post) The Straight Story Feb 2013 OP
The Obama administration is in the banks' pockets. They will NEVER stand up for homeowners. forestpath Feb 2013 #1
Gee, what a shock. woo me with science Feb 2013 #2
I would have sworn that this was going to be Onion Angry Dragon Feb 2013 #3
Maybe on DU we could be our own jury for posts we make The Straight Story Feb 2013 #5
They're ASKING the banks to regulate their abuses? magellan Feb 2013 #4
Yes, let's have mortgage corporations police themselves. City Lights Feb 2013 #6
When is this softness to corporations going to end? ananda Feb 2013 #7
"bungled" Enrique Feb 2013 #8
The process needed to be shut down ProSense Feb 2013 #9
Assuming this is true, this is a lawyer's response. Baitball Blogger Feb 2013 #10
Lawyer's clients want to self-regulate. amandabeech Feb 2013 #19
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #11
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #12
par for the course liberal_at_heart Feb 2013 #13
Surprised Obama's DOJ doesn't throw the homeowners in jail for daring to make the banks look bad. forestpath Feb 2013 #14
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #15
A uniquely TeaPubliKlan solution! TheKentuckian Feb 2013 #16
US justice is a joke! n/t L0oniX Feb 2013 #17
Kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #18
The prisoners run the penitentiary once again. n/t alp227 Feb 2013 #20

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
3. I would have sworn that this was going to be Onion
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 11:09 AM
Feb 2013

I suppose we should have killers be their own jury and everything will work out .........


I sit here shaking my head

magellan

(13,257 posts)
4. They're ASKING the banks to regulate their abuses?
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 11:13 AM
Feb 2013

Gee, what a great idea! I'm going to try that next time someone breaks into my home and starts stealing things.

"Please, I'd really appreciate it if you didn't take quite so much...."

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
9. The process needed to be shut down
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 11:24 AM
Feb 2013

Thomas Curry, head of the OCC since 2012 (it had an acting head since 2010), was the person Senator Warren addressed in the banking hearing. The process was costly and ineffective.

To accelerate the payments, the comptroller’s office decided to cut out the middlemen, the consultants, from the reviews. In a conference call last week, the government outlined a plan to use the lenders instead, according to people with direct knowledge of the discussion. Banks will now have to assess each loan for potential errors, which will help determine the size of the payments to homeowners.

<...>

Despite billing for roughly $2 billion in fees in the 14-month review, consultants examined only a sliver of the 500,000 complaints filed by homeowners, people involved in the matter said. Their efforts were stymied, in part, because regulators urged consultants to first scrutinize a random sample of the four million foreclosures before digging into specific homeowner complaints, the people involved said. The decision, the people said, may have undercut the scope of the settlement and potentially deprived homeowners of additional relief.

Consultants were also criticized for a faulty review process.

Some consulting firms, including the Promontory Financial Group, farmed out much of the work to contract employees. Others faced questions about their objectivity. The consultants, critics note, were paid billions of dollars by the same banks they were expected to police.

Some consultants say they sounded repeated alarms about the process. Last spring, a group of consulting firm executives met with comptroller officials in Washington to voice concerns that the reviews were too narrow, according to people with direct knowledge of the meetings....The review process, with its narrow focus, was created by the comptroller’s office in 2011, under previous leadership.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/big-banks-are-told-to-review-their-own-foreclosures/

When regulating agencies don't do their jobs, it really screws things up.

Baitball Blogger

(46,736 posts)
10. Assuming this is true, this is a lawyer's response.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 11:27 AM
Feb 2013

Lawyers love to self-regulate. Which is why our world is so screwed up today.

Just a theory.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
19. Lawyer's clients want to self-regulate.
Sat Feb 23, 2013, 02:11 AM
Feb 2013

Lawyers would probably rather than the government regulate, because then the lawyers would be called in to represent clients before the governmental regulators. That means more fees for the lawyers.

If the banks regulate themselves, even under federal statutes, it would mean less money for the lawyers.

Now, lawyers who advocate self-regulation are doing so because they're getting a hefty fee for their lobbying work.

For lawyers, its about the fee.

Always.

Take it from an ex-lawyer.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
16. A uniquely TeaPubliKlan solution!
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 03:07 PM
Feb 2013

No longer unique but still less than worthless and Orwellian in concept.

Plus, the failure was willfully weaved into the fabric, there always are enough gremlins to screw up the works, you don't let the regulated choose their regulators to be sure it goes off the rails.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Administration Asks...