Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:32 PM Jan 2012

What really happened at Occupy Oakland on Saturday January 28

January 29, 2012 by baked420


For the internet, here's a first-hand account of Occupy Oakland on 1/28/2012, because the news never tells the full story. I'll tell you about the street battle, the 300+ arrests, the vandalism, the flag burning, all in the context of my experience today. This is deeper than the headlines. No major news source can do that for you.
The stated goal for the day was to "move-in" to a large, abandoned, building to turn it into a social and political center. It is a long vacant convention center - the only people ever near there are the homeless who use the space outside the building as a bed. The building occupation also draws attention to the large number of abandoned and unused buildings in Oakland. The day started with a rally and a march to the proposed building. The police knew which building was the target, surrounded it, and used highly mobile units to try and divert the protest. After avoiding police lines, the group made it to one side of the building. Now, this is a very large building, and we were on a road with construction fences on both sides, and a large ditch separating us from the cops. The police fired smoke grenades into the crowd as the group neared a small path around the ditch, towards the building. They declared an unlawful assembly, and this is when the crowd broke down the construction fence. A few people broke fences to escape the situation, others because they were pissed. A couple more fences were taken down then necessary, but no valuable equipment was destroyed. They only things broken were fences.
The crowd decided to continue moving, and walked up the block to a more regular street. We decided to turn left up the street, and a police line formed to stop the march. They again declared an unlawful assembly. The protesters challenged the line, marching towards the police with our own shields in front. The shields, some small and black and a few large metal sheets. The police fired tear-gas as the group approached, and shot less-than-lethal rounds at the crowd. The protesters returned one volley of firecrackers, small projectiles, and funny things like balloons. A very weak attack, 3 officers may have been hit by something but none of them got injured. Tear gas forced many people back. The protesters quickly regrouped, and pressed the line again. This time the police opened fire with flash-grenades, tear gas, paint-filled beanbag shotguns, and rubber bullets.

-snip-

300+ were arrested, corralled below the YMCA @ 23rd and Broadway. The only announcement that was made was one I've never heard before:
"You are under arrest. Submit to your arrest."
The 300 protesters were then arrested, one by one. They were ziptied and sat in rows while they waited to be processed. OPD set up an entire processing station behind police lines, where they searched and identified every protester. They were slowly loaded onto buses, including local public AC transit buses. This took about 4 or 5 hours.

-snip-

A note about police militarization: I saw some big guns and scary gear tonight. Alameda County Sheriff seems to have an endless budget for that shit. But tonight I saw something much scarier, that I've never seen before. First, I saw that the police have a printed profile books of protesters. I saw a cop flipping through pictures with descriptions, talking about who on their list they've seen today. When resting in Oscar Grant Plaza, a cop was filming the plaza from a rooftop in an adjacent building. They're always filming, some have cameras on their bodies now, but this was clear spying and sophisticated intelligence gathering and analysis. Second, a very large tank on wheels, with a water cannon on top, rolled on scene. Someone said it was called a "grizzly", but I can't find a photo anywhere. help? It was massive, and I stood right next to it before they brought it behind police lines. It was a hardcore, modern urban tank. The police are funded and prepared to use a water cannon on protesters, if need be. Know that.

more at the link

http://nameigoob.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-really-happened-at-occupy-oakland.html

The cops wanted a riot, it seems. No - the cops aren't always wrong but I think they were here and the OPD is the worst. They threw the first punches before the protestors even arrived at Henry J. Kaiser.

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What really happened at Occupy Oakland on Saturday January 28 (Original Post) dana_b Jan 2012 OP
k&r Starry Messenger Jan 2012 #1
Those guys are heroes, they are doing this for everyone. The cops are militarized beyond belief and sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #2
now sabrina... who you gonna believe.. dana_b Jan 2012 #3
Good reporting from someone who was there senseandsensibility Jan 2012 #4
So the protesters look like they were in the wrong. gulliver Jan 2012 #5
Have you ever read about what happened in Argentina after their economy was collapsed by sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #11
Here's a good example, a four-star hotel... Capitalocracy Jan 2012 #40
Yes, that is what I was talking about, thank you. They did this with factories also, when the sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #43
Yes, I can't think of the names of any of the factories off the top of my head Capitalocracy Jan 2012 #44
It's a big vacant PUBLIC building KamaAina Jan 2012 #16
Then they should have asked the public for the right to use it. gulliver Jan 2012 #17
They -- WE -- ARE the public! KamaAina Jan 2012 #19
Some DUers are neoliberals.......... socialist_n_TN Jan 2012 #55
The building had been vacant for years, it looked like an abandoned building. It was an eyesore and fasttense Jan 2012 #27
K&R for the truth varelse Jan 2012 #6
My guess is the flag burning will cost the movement a huge portion of their public supp, regardless humblebum Jan 2012 #7
Really? You have little knowledge then of what this movement is all about. Watch it grow as sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #13
I totally support the movement, but that is simply not going to go over well humblebum Jan 2012 #18
It's going to get worse. fasttense Jan 2012 #28
And we continue to buy foreign products at Walmart. nt humblebum Jan 2012 #32
And the youth of our nation support socialism....... socialist_n_TN Jan 2012 #56
Really? And just how would you know this? SammyWinstonJack Jan 2012 #37
Various public polls have been showing that since late fall. nt humblebum Jan 2012 #42
Still more popular than any other big movement in recent history, and it will become more so sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #45
I would hope you are right, but they don't seem to be articulating any clear message, humblebum Jan 2012 #51
Lol, as if any social justice movement ever cared about polls. If they did, the Civil Rights sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #59
Time will tell, but right now...? nt humblebum Jan 2012 #60
Hell sabrina, if we waited for the CENTER right........ socialist_n_TN Jan 2012 #57
And yet you can not cite one that supports the claim you made freely? Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #52
Huh? I just did. Or is this more what you are looking for? humblebum Jan 2012 #53
'A social and political center'? randome Jan 2012 #8
There is much more to politics than electoral office. OWS is non-partisan Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #15
Politics is not just about elections, it is about the system and how to change it so that it sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #46
How many agent provocateurs were involved? AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #9
Six. randome Jan 2012 #12
I would say much more than that. Broderick Jan 2012 #33
That's a pretty lopsided account there. Did you close your eyes when the female ... T S Justly Jan 2012 #10
uh... I didn't write that dana_b Jan 2012 #14
Did it look like this? Sirveri Jan 2012 #20
it's in this video dana_b Jan 2012 #21
It's not only an incedible, crazy thing for civilian cops to use Mopar151 Jan 2012 #23
Thanks knr Zorra Jan 2012 #22
Very helpful thread; thanks all. snot Jan 2012 #24
OWS keeps taking a licking but keeps on ticking... midnight Jan 2012 #25
I'm surprised the usual concern trolls haven't shown up to piss on this thread. backscatter712 Jan 2012 #26
They're here. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2012 #38
My corporate masters told me to wait a while between posts. randome Jan 2012 #39
Quite a generous corporate master. Capitalocracy Jan 2012 #47
Firecrackers? The protesters threw firecrackers at the cops? What.... Scuba Jan 2012 #29
In police parlance, they're called IEDs. No kidding. nt pinboy3niner Jan 2012 #30
That's not unreasonable from their perspective..... Scuba Jan 2012 #31
Have to agree on this one. Rex Jan 2012 #35
Unpossible metalbot Jan 2012 #54
kick barbtries Jan 2012 #34
It will end when the paymaster find a way to get rid of OWS. Rex Jan 2012 #36
it will end barbtries Jan 2012 #41
Yes. Rex Jan 2012 #58
How many burglaries have happened in Oakland this week? Nevernose Jan 2012 #48
Thank you unionworks Jan 2012 #49
K&R....n/t unkachuck Jan 2012 #50

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
2. Those guys are heroes, they are doing this for everyone. The cops are militarized beyond belief and
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:39 PM
Jan 2012

there should be no tolerance for this kind of 'force' in a democracy.

We watched it all on live-feed and it was once again, thoroughly disgusting to see the agency paid for by the people, once again launch an all-out war against their own people.

And people wonder what they would do if they were ever ordered to shoot to kill American citizens. I think there is no doubt about the answer to that.

Btw, the description of events in the OP is exactly what we witnessed from all of the livestreams.

The cops lied to the media, and the media, especially MSNBC, as always, passed on the lies.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
3. now sabrina... who you gonna believe..
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:47 PM
Jan 2012

the news "journalists" or your lying eyes?

I watched it too and was horrified. We were going to go down there too except that I knew that I couldn't physically handle the marching. I hope shit like this doesn't scare too many away in the future.

senseandsensibility

(17,066 posts)
4. Good reporting from someone who was there
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:48 PM
Jan 2012

It is interesting to compare this to what I heard on the ten o'clock local news last night. The news was almost completely slanted to the police point of view. It did allow one protestor to speak a sentence or two. This account does not attempt to whitewash either side.

gulliver

(13,186 posts)
5. So the protesters look like they were in the wrong.
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:54 PM
Jan 2012

Who told them it would be smart to try to take over a big vacant building? It's imbecilic. And then "marching towards the police with our own shields in front." It just doesn't get more stupid than that. Unless you count returning "one volley of firecrackers, small projectiles, and funny things like balloons."

These protesters aren't OWS at all. They are idiots who are discrediting the hard work of the movement.

What must have happened is the usual process where frustration causes the angrier, stupider members of a group to rise to leadership.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
11. Have you ever read about what happened in Argentina after their economy was collapsed by
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 05:49 PM
Jan 2012

the same Global criminals?

There is nothing at all unusual for a movement which was born out of the income inequality and financial corruption that currently exists in this country, to take over vacant buildings.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
43. Yes, that is what I was talking about, thank you. They did this with factories also, when the
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 09:07 PM
Jan 2012

Global Corporatists shut them down to take their 'business' elsewhere after contributing to the collapse of Argentina's economy.

This is the model that the Occupiers should follow now, imo. I am sure they will easily get donations to move forward on a project like this, providing shelter and even work for people currently the victims of the economic collapse.

Thank you for the link, I hope they succeed in gaining ownership or at least legal occupancy.

Capitalocracy

(4,307 posts)
44. Yes, I can't think of the names of any of the factories off the top of my head
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 09:16 PM
Jan 2012

but this is still considered a very important hotel in terms of the tourism industry, even under new management.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
16. It's a big vacant PUBLIC building
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 06:13 PM
Jan 2012

it's not like they were taking over private property or anything.

"Whose building? OUR building!"

gulliver

(13,186 posts)
17. Then they should have asked the public for the right to use it.
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 06:33 PM
Jan 2012

The public owns the building, and their representatives (in a democracy) get to decide who occupies it. I don't know whether they did it, but at a minimum, they should have asked the public to use the building and explained (in reasonable terms) what they wanted to use it for. Otherwise, it is just trespassing on the public's property. By your interpretation, a group of Tea Party Republicans could just go in and set up an "I Love W" association.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
19. They -- WE -- ARE the public!
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 08:37 PM
Jan 2012

That's what the 1%ers seem to have forgotten. Pity some DUers have, too.

Now I'm trying to picture a group of Tea Party Republicans in Oakland. Without much success.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
27. The building had been vacant for years, it looked like an abandoned building. It was an eyesore and
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:26 AM
Jan 2012

of little to no value in its current condition.

But we have to volley smoke bombs, corral, beat and arrest protesters to protect a vacant and abandoned building? Really? What the protesters were going to do to a vacant, abandoned, worthless building had to be stopped at all cost? Really?

So how useful to the public was the police causing another riot over a worthless, vacant, abandoned building?

We saved a vacant, abandoned, worthless building from a sit-in.

Sometimes common sense should trump minor regulations and laws.

 

humblebum

(5,881 posts)
7. My guess is the flag burning will cost the movement a huge portion of their public supp, regardless
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 04:36 PM
Jan 2012

of who was responsible for it. The movement has lost its purpose in the eyes of many who originally supported it.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
13. Really? You have little knowledge then of what this movement is all about. Watch it grow as
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 05:56 PM
Jan 2012

issues that are far more important to the American people than one small, insignificant even like this, continue to worsen, especially after the collapse of the European economy, than one small, insignificant event like this.

Of course maybe you would like the movement to go away, but that is not going to happen. Starving, jobless, homeless people will have to be fed, housed and find jobs available, college student loans will have to be reduced, healthcare made available to all Americans, the money taken out of politics, and those responsible for the Financial Meltdown held accountable, before we have the luxury of pining over a few individuals buring a flag.

The only people who will try to use this are the same people who were never going to be a part of this movement in the first place, and they are no loss.

Amazing that anyone would think a single incident like this would end a global, growing and more than necessary, justifiable movement.

 

humblebum

(5,881 posts)
18. I totally support the movement, but that is simply not going to go over well
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 06:38 PM
Jan 2012

to those who see something like that happen. Not smart.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
28. It's going to get worse.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:38 AM
Jan 2012

This American society is on a tipping point.

The youth of our nation have no jobs. The youth of our nation can no longer afford college and further education. The youth of our nation have stunningly high unemployment numbers. The youth of our nation are returning from the wars with no job opportunities. The youth of our nation are being systematically prevented from voting and participating in our political process. Our politicians are ignoring the complaints of the youth of our nation. The youth of our nation have idle hands and minds and NO hope that the political system will help them.

The Koch Brothers, banksters and corporations have systematically closed all possible exists for the pent up drive, energy and hope of our youth. The youth of our nation have no choice. They will revolt. Every nation in history who has done this to their young adults has seen a revolution. It's going to get worse.

SammyWinstonJack

(44,130 posts)
37. Really? And just how would you know this?
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jan 2012
The movement has lost its purpose in the eyes of many who orginally supported it.


Have anything beside your opinion to back that statement?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
45. Still more popular than any other big movement in recent history, and it will become more so
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 09:57 PM
Jan 2012

as time goes on. No one is worried about polls, they are worried about people. Rightwingers of course have never supported this movement as they always assume that any movement that is intended to benefit ordinary people, must be a 'commie plot'. But no one cares much about what they think, if we waited for the far right to approve of doing anything to get this country on track to benefit its citizens, it would never happen. For some reason they blindly support those who are stealing their freedoms and livelihood.

 

humblebum

(5,881 posts)
51. I would hope you are right, but they don't seem to be articulating any clear message,
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 11:48 AM
Jan 2012

and some polls now rank their popularity at less than the Tea Party.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2011/11/occupy-wall-street-favor-fading.html

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
59. Lol, as if any social justice movement ever cared about polls. If they did, the Civil Rights
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 05:45 PM
Jan 2012

movement would have simply gone home and we would be still be living in the fifties.

This is a movement that will not go away, it will be here for years, as were all other social justice movements. You can either support it or not, if you don't care about the gross inequalities growing in America and around the globe today, then no need for you to join or support this movement. But enough people DO care to cause the rapid spread of a movement, still in its infancy, all over the country and the globe in just a couple of months.

No need for you to be 'concerned'. This is going to continue to grow until the issues are addressed, and as more and more people suffer as a result of the inequality becoming more apparent each day, the bigger the movement will grow.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
57. Hell sabrina, if we waited for the CENTER right........
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 12:46 PM
Jan 2012

or even the centrists to approve of doing ANYTHING to get this country on track to benefit it's citizens, it would never happen. Far reaching changes are NEVER spurred on by the timid with small ideas. In fact, they are usually opposed to doing anything active.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
8. 'A social and political center'?
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 04:42 PM
Jan 2012

But OWS is about economic injustice and has NO political aspirations at all.

At least that's what we've been told.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
46. Politics is not just about elections, it is about the system and how to change it so that it
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 10:00 PM
Jan 2012

starts benefiting the people of this country rather than the corporations. You misunderstood that it is 'not political'. It is not a partisan political movement. But it is about the politics of this country and how they have been taken over by Wall Street and the goal is to stop this before it is too late.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
9. How many agent provocateurs were involved?
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 04:56 PM
Jan 2012

No response with information has yet to be made to the earlier FOIA requests by The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF), which was joined by Michael Moore, re demands to federal and local law enforcement agencies seeking public disclosure of documents and information concerning their involvement in the coordinated crackdown on Occupy encampments across the nation.
http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/occupy-crackdown-legal.html

As noted:

Mara Veheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director of the Partnership for Civil Justice and the co-chair of the National Lawyers Guild’s National Mass Defense Committee, states: “The severe crackdown on the occupation movement appears to be part of a national strategy to crush the movement. This multi-jurisdictional coordination shows that the crackdown is supremely political.”

“The FOIA requests seek critical information regarding the role of federal law enforcement agencies,” Verheyden-Hilliard explained. “The Occupy demonstrations are not criminal activities, and police should not be treating them as such. This protest movement for social and economic justice has captured the imagination of the country. The coordinated effort of law enforcement to suppress it is a reflection of its political challenge to the status-quo.”
http://occupyatlanta.org/2011/11/22/pcjf-and-nlg-file-freedom-of-information-act-requests/

Broderick

(4,578 posts)
33. I would say much more than that.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 12:04 PM
Jan 2012

Maybe 10-20, possibly 30 or more. They infiltrated to the hilt and are being paid huge dollars to discredit the movement. Look at the folks standing next to you and be cautious and wary of those that are seemingly fitting in very well. Look under the covers and check the closet. Trust nobody, and if you see some folks with huge wads of cash - report them to OWS leaders. Heck the agents might even be leaders.


Seriously, this talk just fragments the movement.

 

T S Justly

(884 posts)
10. That's a pretty lopsided account there. Did you close your eyes when the female ...
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 04:59 PM
Jan 2012

Medic was wholloped in the kidneys. Eyewitness accounts, including live streamer,
Oakfosho, I believe, reported the medic's eventual collapse some hours after one of
many assaults against kettled, not corraled, protestors by the police.

Please watch the live stream's coverage of events recorded from yesterday and
through-out the night.

http://www.livestream.com/occupyoakland

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
14. uh... I didn't write that
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 05:59 PM
Jan 2012

this is from the blog of one of the protestors who was there. I did watch the stream yesterday and I do hope that medic will recover soon. I heard that she was peeing blood.

Mopar151

(9,989 posts)
23. It's not only an incedible, crazy thing for civilian cops to use
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 01:13 AM
Jan 2012

It's a serious deathtrap for anyone inside it. The outside fuel tank would be very easy to puncture or drill - it may even have a drain cock on the bottom. For a bunch of wierd reasons*, I know how vulnerable this thing is to real firepower, never mind a lunatic with a bulldozer or big excavator.
To think that we, as taxpayers, buy this albatross instead of paying teachers or the like, is a crying fucking shame.



*Some is covered by nondisclosures, others I would not feel right about divulging....

midnight

(26,624 posts)
25. OWS keeps taking a licking but keeps on ticking...
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:18 AM
Jan 2012

Finding resources for the poor to build a community will always be reflected upon in a negative way.... Hopefully in time OWS will change that dialogue too...

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
26. I'm surprised the usual concern trolls haven't shown up to piss on this thread.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 03:27 AM
Jan 2012

I guess the truth discourages them.

Maybe they're delayed because they're on a conference call with corporate to get their talking points straight...

Before, they felt confident spewing the talking points from the lying corporate media, who in turn, spewed lies from the professional liars of the Oakland PD. Of course, now that we're hearing the stories from people on the ground who saw the events first hand, they can't use the corporate spin...

The fact is that most of the people there were peaceful, most of the people broke no laws, and that the conduct of the Oakland PD can only be described as a police riot.

But they're more than happy to tar the entire movement with the actions of a few, punish the many for just being around when a law might have been broken, and smugly flame everyone with the same bullshit that goes on FOX News afterwards.

Capitalocracy

(4,307 posts)
47. Quite a generous corporate master.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 10:18 PM
Jan 2012

My socialist slave drivers want me to make at least one post every 10 seconds.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
29. Firecrackers? The protesters threw firecrackers at the cops? What....
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 09:08 AM
Jan 2012

... were they trying to do, get people killed?



 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
35. Have to agree on this one.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:50 PM
Jan 2012

Throwing firecrackers at cops in riotgear is like inviting Death into your house. They are lucky the cops didn't start opening fire with real bullets.

metalbot

(1,058 posts)
54. Unpossible
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 12:37 PM
Jan 2012

I've been assured that Occupy is completely peaceful.


Throwing firecrackers at police is completely insane, unless it's an attempt to provoke the police into shooting so that they can point out how evil the police are, in which case it's not insane, but just stupid and wrong.

barbtries

(28,799 posts)
34. kick
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:47 PM
Jan 2012

the movement can't be stopped but every time i read about how they're trying to stop it i feel a deep sadness. where will it end.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
36. It will end when the paymaster find a way to get rid of OWS.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:52 PM
Jan 2012

They are spending billions on it; just have no idea how to get rid of a real populist movement.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
48. How many burglaries have happened in Oakland this week?
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 10:26 PM
Jan 2012

That's a crime in which real people with real property were injured. OPD, however, focused the attention of several hundred cops on people who wanted to sit inside an abandoned, city-owned convention center.

Way to go, Oakland! And way to show where your real priorities are -- not with the average citizens who were actually harmed, but in preventing Occupiers from embarrassing billionaires.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What really happened at O...