Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsthe mark lynas mythology: a GMO 'conversion' non story
http://www.nationofchange.org/mark-lynas-mythology-gmo-conversion-non-story-1361028893On Jan. 3, Mark Lynas, British author of several books on global warming including Six Degrees: Our Future on a Hotter Planet, told a sold-out audience at the Oxford Farming Conference in Oxford, England, that he was sorry.
Sorry that he'd maligned genetically modified (GM) crops. Sorry that he'd helped to start the anti-GM movement. Sorry that he'd demonized a technology that could be used to benefit the environment.
That's right. An expert on global warming was now telling the world that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and GM crops, with their billions of tons of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, with their large-scale monocultures that leave food crops vulnerable to drought, pests and disease, are good for the environment.
Mainstream media reporters tripped over themselves to get the story out. Suddenly, the Mark Lynas conversion speech was major news. An Environmentalist's Conversion, read the New Yorker. Stark Shift for Onetime Foe of Genetic Engineering in Crops, said the New York Times.
Never mind that Lynas's past work has been almost exclusively on climate issues, rather than genetically engineered foods and farming. Never mind that thereal leaders of the European anti-GMO movement scoffed at the notion that he was in any way a leader or founder. Never mind that his conversion was hardly news - he's been publicly praising genetically modified organisms (GMOs) for at least three years. The press fawned over Lynas's recantation.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 989 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the mark lynas mythology: a GMO 'conversion' non story (Original Post)
xchrom
Feb 2013
OP
KG
(28,751 posts)1. piss on mark lynas
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)3. "junk science," right?
We prefer unfounded abject fear and paranoia of the unknown.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)2. Nevermind that someone with scientific knowledge was leaving the cause...
That's right. An expert on global warming was now telling the world that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and GM crops, with their billions of tons of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, with their large-scale monocultures that leave food crops vulnerable to drought, pests and disease, are good for the environment.
Let's look at this very closely.
"Their billions of tons of pesticides" is pertinent to Roundup Ready soybean, but not Bt corn, which is still demonized. Bt corn uses as its built-in pest resistance the naturally occurring Bacillus thruingiensis, touted by organic gardners as the perfect alternative to synthetic pesticides. It's now a poison? Really?
"chemical fertilizers" There is absolutely nothing about GMO crops that requires chemical fertilizers any more than non-GMOs. GMO soybean fixes its own nitrogen, just like non-GMO soybean.
You see, it's this kind of hysterical ignorance that those with scientific knowledge on this subject find repulsive.
And did it occur to you for even an instant that, if farmers didn't crave these products, they would not buy them?