Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 07:57 AM Feb 2013

the mark lynas mythology: a GMO 'conversion' non story

http://www.nationofchange.org/mark-lynas-mythology-gmo-conversion-non-story-1361028893



On Jan. 3, Mark Lynas, British author of several books on global warming including Six Degrees: Our Future on a Hotter Planet, told a sold-out audience at the Oxford Farming Conference in Oxford, England, that he was sorry.

Sorry that he'd maligned genetically modified (GM) crops. Sorry that he'd “helped to start the anti-GM movement.” Sorry that he'd “demonized” a technology that could be used to “benefit the environment.”

That's right. An expert on global warming was now telling the world that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and GM crops, with their billions of tons of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, with their large-scale monocultures that leave food crops vulnerable to drought, pests and disease, are good for the environment.

Mainstream media reporters tripped over themselves to get the story out. Suddenly, the Mark Lynas “ conversion speech” was major news. “An Environmentalist's Conversion,” read the New Yorker. “Stark Shift for Onetime Foe of Genetic Engineering in Crops,” said the New York Times.

Never mind that Lynas's past work has been almost exclusively on climate issues, rather than genetically engineered foods and farming. Never mind that thereal leaders of the European anti-GMO movement scoffed at the notion that he was in any way a leader or founder. Never mind that his “conversion” was hardly news - he's been publicly praising genetically modified organisms (GMOs) for at least three years. The press fawned over Lynas's recantation.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the mark lynas mythology: a GMO 'conversion' non story (Original Post) xchrom Feb 2013 OP
piss on mark lynas KG Feb 2013 #1
"junk science," right? Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #3
Nevermind that someone with scientific knowledge was leaving the cause... Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #2
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
2. Nevermind that someone with scientific knowledge was leaving the cause...
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:43 AM
Feb 2013
That's right. An expert on global warming was now telling the world that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and GM crops, with their billions of tons of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, with their large-scale monocultures that leave food crops vulnerable to drought, pests and disease, are good for the environment.


Let's look at this very closely.

"Their billions of tons of pesticides" is pertinent to Roundup Ready soybean, but not Bt corn, which is still demonized. Bt corn uses as its built-in pest resistance the naturally occurring Bacillus thruingiensis, touted by organic gardners as the perfect alternative to synthetic pesticides. It's now a poison? Really?

"chemical fertilizers" There is absolutely nothing about GMO crops that requires chemical fertilizers any more than non-GMOs. GMO soybean fixes its own nitrogen, just like non-GMO soybean.

You see, it's this kind of hysterical ignorance that those with scientific knowledge on this subject find repulsive.

And did it occur to you for even an instant that, if farmers didn't crave these products, they would not buy them?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»the mark lynas mythology:...