General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLindsey Graham: I Love Bombs, NOT People
GRAHAM: Well, all i can say is the commander-in-chief thought came up with the idea of sequestration, destroying the military and putting a lot of good programs at risk. It is my belief take Obamacare and put it on the table. You can make $86,000 a year in income and still get a government subsidy under Obamacare. Obamacare is destroying health care in this country and people are leaving the private sector, because their companies cannot afford to offer Obamacare and if you want to look at ways to find $1.2 trillion in savings over the next decade, look at Obamacare, dont destroy the military and cut blindly across the board. There are many ways to do it but the president is the commander-in-chief and on his watch well begin to unravel the finest military in the history of the world, at a time when we need it most. The Iranians are watching us, we are allowing people to be destroyed in Syria, and im disappointed in our commander-in-chief.http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/2013/02/what-lindsay-graham-said.html
Still Sensible
(2,870 posts)the prototypical republican of 2013.
kairos12
(12,862 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)I really hate that fucking pissant
Botany
(70,516 posts)still_one
(92,217 posts)filibuster.
You do not have to do it on the first day of Congress, that is a lie, perpetuated by the MSM. You can change the Senate rules anytime
Botany
(70,516 posts)... simple majority and now w/ the new reality of having to 60 votes on everything
changing the filibuster rule would be impossible.
still_one
(92,217 posts)http://www.libertylawsite.org/2013/01/03/why-a-majority-of-the-senate-change-the-filibuster-rule/
I doubt that Democrats really want to do that though. Even assuming that article wrong, the Democrats in the Senate under Reid did not get rid of the filibuster when they could have. Worse, we were told by the majority leader he did not have the votes.
Why were we not allowed to see who was for it and who was against it?
EastKYLiberal
(429 posts)Festivito
(13,452 posts)He's got a partisan opinion against a bunch of calculations made by a joint team.
Only an idiot would listen to that.
ACA (Obamacare) has nothing to do with sequestration. Nothing! Stopping one doesn't move the other in any direction.
He's blowing partisan smoke. Don't be an idiot.
spanone
(135,844 posts)i imagine the military's waste could fund 'Obamacare' for generations.
i just love they way they keep repeating that the sequester was Obama's idea. lying motherfuckers, nothing less.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)He wears it so well.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Billz Message auto-removed
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Not to mention the wish for violence. There are better ways of expressing yourself than violence and sexist insults.
It would probably be best to not do that.
Response to uppityperson (Reply #13)
Billz Message auto-removed