Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mira

(22,380 posts)
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:06 PM Feb 2013

House Science Committee Questions Existence of Meteors - Shocking Borowitz report

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—The chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology said today that the committee would hold hearings next week “to settle the question, once and for all, of whether meteors exist.”

“The media has been in something of a frenzy recently on this whole topic of meteors,” said chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas). “I think it’s irresponsible of them to frighten the public about something that, at the end of the day, may be about as real as unicorns.”
Rep. Smith said that he had seen recent reports of the “so-called Russian meteor” of last week, but added, “Maybe it’s the scientific skeptic in me, but this ‘meteor’ may just have been a bunch of fireworks that some Siberian fellow set off after drinking a little too much Stoli.
It is winter, after all, and that’s how those folks keep warm.”

The Texas congressman said that he and other meteor doubters are worried that scientists had “a vested interest” in convincing people that meteors are real: “They want the government to spend more money on science, and, let me tell you, that is the last thing the Science Committee is going to do.”

As for the scientific theory that meteors may have killed the dinosaurs, Rep. Smith chuckled, “That theory would also have us believe that there were dinosaurs.”


Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/02/house-science-committee-questions-existence-of-meteors.html#ixzz2LB1ldqhm

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Science Committee Questions Existence of Meteors - Shocking Borowitz report (Original Post) Mira Feb 2013 OP
Meteor deniers. Wow. Who knew? ...nt TeeYiYi Feb 2013 #1
Representative Smith: No dinosaurs? Then, please explain this: NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #2
I was hoping this was a piece from the Onion... Sinistrous Feb 2013 #3
Just because it's not the Onion doesn't mean it's not satire. Brickbat Feb 2013 #5
There are times when the Onion® is nearly bush league compared to Borowitz's wicked cool pen Brother Buzz Feb 2013 #6
There was a time when satire was recognizable. Control-Z Feb 2013 #9
Yup. Poe's Law becomes more and more real every day... SidDithers Feb 2013 #15
...and iguess it was my turn to be the gullible naif... Sinistrous Feb 2013 #20
Mistakes are how we learn... SidDithers Feb 2013 #21
This piece had me worried until I clicked the link and saw it was Borowitz. SwissTony Feb 2013 #31
Leave it to Andy Borowitz - hilarious Siwsan Feb 2013 #4
You mean this is NOT an Onion article? Jamastiene Feb 2013 #7
Andy Borowitz TopHatCat Feb 2013 #8
If meteors are outlawed LiberalEsto Feb 2013 #10
HAHAHA!! CrazyOrangeCat Feb 2013 #12
The only thing that can stop TopHatCat Feb 2013 #11
They're trying to revive Reagan's StarWars program: freshwest Feb 2013 #14
The answer of course, is "More meteors". Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #30
Turning the stupid up to 11. K&R Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #13
Nothing against you, Mira.. RudynJack Feb 2013 #16
It's only been lately Mira Feb 2013 #22
c'mon, this is from the Onion..right.............right?! Demonaut Feb 2013 #17
The Onion isn't the only source of satire out there. (nt) Posteritatis Feb 2013 #18
I do love myself some Borowitz report. nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #19
I think there should be a satire forum Shankapotomus Feb 2013 #23
I think that kind of "misinformation" Mira Feb 2013 #25
I wouldn't be surprised if there were people like this. sakabatou Feb 2013 #24
There is, of course, a simple solution to meteors.. Permanut Feb 2013 #26
No ...silly Du memeber. Give them personhood! n/t L0oniX Feb 2013 #28
Dang, I shoulda thoughta that! n/t Permanut Feb 2013 #29
People wonder if the House Science Committee has brains. n/t L0oniX Feb 2013 #27

Sinistrous

(4,249 posts)
3. I was hoping this was a piece from the Onion...
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:11 PM
Feb 2013

I am nearly ill thinking that anyone this ignorant is even breathing, much less sitting as a representative in Congress.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
9. There was a time when satire was recognizable.
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:34 PM
Feb 2013

Right wing extremists have blurred the line so as to make satire fully believable much of the time.

This is satire -Andy Borowitz writes the Borowitz Report for the New Yorker Magazine.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/02/house-science-committee-questions-existence-of-meteors.html#ixzz2LB1ldqhm

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
15. Yup. Poe's Law becomes more and more real every day...
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 03:13 PM
Feb 2013
Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.




Sid

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
21. Mistakes are how we learn...
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 03:32 PM
Feb 2013


Borowitz is posted here quite often, tho. Keep an eye out for his stuff. A lot of it is really good.

Sid

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
31. This piece had me worried until I clicked the link and saw it was Borowitz.
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 05:27 AM
Feb 2013

And you are right. The line is very blurred. Legitimate rape?????? etc etc.

Siwsan

(26,268 posts)
4. Leave it to Andy Borowitz - hilarious
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:11 PM
Feb 2013

But, unfortunately, might not be too far from the true belief, with some of these extremists.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
14. They're trying to revive Reagan's StarWars program:
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 03:09 PM
Feb 2013


White House Vaporizes Death Star Petition



An estimated $850 quadrillion effort to add a “Death Star” similar to the one seen in “Star Wars” to the United States’ military arsenal would be too costly and doomed to failure. This according to the Obama administration which on Saturday officially rejected a citizen petition calling for the White House to “secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016.”

In an official response to the petition, which has so far gathered more than 34,000 signatures, the White House said that while the creation of a Death Star would likely spur job growth and bolster national defense, it’s generally a bad idea.

“The Administration does not support blowing up planets,” Paul Shawcross, chief of the Science and Space Branch at the White House Office of Management and Budget, wrote — tongue firmly in cheek. “Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?”

Indeed. Probably would have been better off starting out small and asking for a Millennium Falcon …


More details at link:

http://allthingsd.com/20130112/white-house-vaporizes-death-star-petition/

Give it up, GOP. Sure, it's hard trying new things. Learn to play chess instead of Global Thermonuclear War.


RudynJack

(1,044 posts)
16. Nothing against you, Mira..
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 03:14 PM
Feb 2013

but this is why I hate satire in GD.

Half the people don't get it, and it makes DU appear to be full of idiots.

Mira

(22,380 posts)
22. It's only been lately
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 03:33 PM
Feb 2013

that there seem to be some that don't get it. Or have never heard of Borowitz.
Learning is good.

I am against setting someone up to make them realize it is satire because part of the charm to me as I read it is the moment it dawns on me.
Of course Borowitz is getting better, too. He is quite cutting edge and as the folks in the right wing get more and more desperate and say more and more outrageous things, his commentary is easily mistaken for something that could actually have happened.

Which to me makes it better and sharper than ever.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
23. I think there should be a satire forum
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 03:42 PM
Feb 2013

This is maybe the third time satire on DU almost got past my bullsh%t detector. Who knows what already has. I think these threads are fun and by all means should continue but I think there is a danger for the community to become misinformed if these threads are not explicitly marked.

Mira

(22,380 posts)
25. I think that kind of "misinformation"
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 03:50 PM
Feb 2013

will actually over time stimulate a bit more critical thinking, and therefore be a vehicle for good.
As I said in a reply before, specifying it as satire beforehand takes a lot of the fun out of it, and some of that fun is the critical thinking part.
I don't want everything pre-chewed, and pre-labeled.
Besides,
I put "Borowitz" into the title every single time I post his commentary on current events, which always is within a day of when it happens.
Before too long that alone gives you the heads up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House Science Committee Q...