General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse Science Committee Questions Existence of Meteors - Shocking Borowitz report
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)The chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology said today that the committee would hold hearings next week to settle the question, once and for all, of whether meteors exist.
The media has been in something of a frenzy recently on this whole topic of meteors, said chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas). I think its irresponsible of them to frighten the public about something that, at the end of the day, may be about as real as unicorns.
Rep. Smith said that he had seen recent reports of the so-called Russian meteor of last week, but added, Maybe its the scientific skeptic in me, but this meteor may just have been a bunch of fireworks that some Siberian fellow set off after drinking a little too much Stoli.
It is winter, after all, and thats how those folks keep warm.
The Texas congressman said that he and other meteor doubters are worried that scientists had a vested interest in convincing people that meteors are real: They want the government to spend more money on science, and, let me tell you, that is the last thing the Science Committee is going to do.
As for the scientific theory that meteors may have killed the dinosaurs, Rep. Smith chuckled, That theory would also have us believe that there were dinosaurs.
Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/02/house-science-committee-questions-existence-of-meteors.html#ixzz2LB1ldqhm
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)TYY
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Sinistrous
(4,249 posts)I am nearly ill thinking that anyone this ignorant is even breathing, much less sitting as a representative in Congress.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)Right wing extremists have blurred the line so as to make satire fully believable much of the time.
This is satire -Andy Borowitz writes the Borowitz Report for the New Yorker Magazine.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/02/house-science-committee-questions-existence-of-meteors.html#ixzz2LB1ldqhm
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Sinistrous
(4,249 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Borowitz is posted here quite often, tho. Keep an eye out for his stuff. A lot of it is really good.
Sid
SwissTony
(2,560 posts)And you are right. The line is very blurred. Legitimate rape?????? etc etc.
Siwsan
(26,268 posts)But, unfortunately, might not be too far from the true belief, with some of these extremists.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)TopHatCat
(20 posts)Is a comedian and satirist....
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)only outlaws will have meteors
CrazyOrangeCat
(6,112 posts)I knew I shouldn't drink hot tea while reading this thread . . .
TopHatCat
(20 posts)a bad guy with a meteor is a good guy with a meteor....
freshwest
(53,661 posts)White House Vaporizes Death Star Petition
An estimated $850 quadrillion effort to add a Death Star similar to the one seen in Star Wars to the United States military arsenal would be too costly and doomed to failure. This according to the Obama administration which on Saturday officially rejected a citizen petition calling for the White House to secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016.
In an official response to the petition, which has so far gathered more than 34,000 signatures, the White House said that while the creation of a Death Star would likely spur job growth and bolster national defense, its generally a bad idea.
The Administration does not support blowing up planets, Paul Shawcross, chief of the Science and Space Branch at the White House Office of Management and Budget, wrote tongue firmly in cheek. Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?
Indeed. Probably would have been better off starting out small and asking for a Millennium Falcon
More details at link:
http://allthingsd.com/20130112/white-house-vaporizes-death-star-petition/
Give it up, GOP. Sure, it's hard trying new things. Learn to play chess instead of Global Thermonuclear War.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)RudynJack
(1,044 posts)but this is why I hate satire in GD.
Half the people don't get it, and it makes DU appear to be full of idiots.
Mira
(22,380 posts)that there seem to be some that don't get it. Or have never heard of Borowitz.
Learning is good.
I am against setting someone up to make them realize it is satire because part of the charm to me as I read it is the moment it dawns on me.
Of course Borowitz is getting better, too. He is quite cutting edge and as the folks in the right wing get more and more desperate and say more and more outrageous things, his commentary is easily mistaken for something that could actually have happened.
Which to me makes it better and sharper than ever.
Demonaut
(8,918 posts)oh shit
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)This is maybe the third time satire on DU almost got past my bullsh%t detector. Who knows what already has. I think these threads are fun and by all means should continue but I think there is a danger for the community to become misinformed if these threads are not explicitly marked.
Mira
(22,380 posts)will actually over time stimulate a bit more critical thinking, and therefore be a vehicle for good.
As I said in a reply before, specifying it as satire beforehand takes a lot of the fun out of it, and some of that fun is the critical thinking part.
I don't want everything pre-chewed, and pre-labeled.
Besides,
I put "Borowitz" into the title every single time I post his commentary on current events, which always is within a day of when it happens.
Before too long that alone gives you the heads up.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Permanut
(5,610 posts)just make them illegal.