Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"How Paul Krugman Broke A Wikipedia Page On Economics" By Andrew Leonard at Salon
How Paul Krugman Broke A Wikipedia Page On EconomicsBy Andrew Leonard at Salon
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/how_paul_krugman_broke_a_wikipedia_page_on_economics/
"SNIP................................................
Theres a lockdown on the Wikipedia page for Austrian economics and wouldnt you know it, one or way or another, it all seems to be Paul Krugmans fault.
Broadly speaking, Austrian economics, for those who have not yet had the pleasure of being introduced, are characterized by an extreme distrust of state intervention in markets, a distaste for statistical modeling and a general confidence that markets, left to their own devices, will avoid booms and busts and nasty things like inflation. From a political perspective, Austrian economics tends to lurk to the right of even such conservative icons as Milton Friedman.
For more detail, you can go, of course, to the Wikipedia page for Austrian economics. But until at least Feb. 28, if you do so, you will find that the page is currently protected from editing. An edit war has been raging behind the scenes. Two factions were repeatedly deleting and replacing a section of text that had to do with a description of a critique of Austrian economics made by economist Paul Krugman.
The closer you look, the more the whole affair appears at first to be a demonstration of Sayres Law, which holds that in any dispute the intensity of feeling is inversely proportional to the value of the issues at stake. One side, which seems from the Talk page chronicling the argument to be just one very stubborn person, is objecting to the inclusion of Krugmans critique on the grounds that what Krugman describes as Austrian economics doesnt actually represent the reality of Austrian economics. In other words, its as if Krugman was saying the problem with blue is that it is red. Therefore, his views should not be included as an example of a valid critique. The other side is basically saying that Krugman is Nobel Prize-winning economist whose opinion is well worth including according to the standards of Wikipedia. So there. And back and forth the argument went, with lots of torturous discursions into the process weeds of Wikipedia editing policies, until it got too heated and provoked a lockdown.
...............................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 952 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"How Paul Krugman Broke A Wikipedia Page On Economics" By Andrew Leonard at Salon (Original Post)
applegrove
Feb 2013
OP
I took one Econ course in grad school and the Austrian School stuff nearly broke my mind...
CTyankee
Feb 2013
#1
While Dr. Krugman's ideas are not beyond debate, the Austrian School is borderline
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2013
#2
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)1. I took one Econ course in grad school and the Austrian School stuff nearly broke my mind...
VonWeiser and BohmBawerk nearly put me over the edge. However, what I DID get from vonWeiser was the concept of "opportunity cost," which I feel is a helpful iidea.
I liked Pigou better (for his time) since I approve (generally) of the Pigouvian tax....
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)2. While Dr. Krugman's ideas are not beyond debate, the Austrian School is borderline
delusional. Von Mises was a third rate mind raving for dollars, who simply ignored every bit of information that didn't fit in his unstable model . I only wish there were more people with the interest and understanding to get into this.