General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsComcast cable TV costs called into question in Eagan (Minnesota)
Objecting to Comcasts decision to start charging for the digital receivers it handed out for free two years ago, a few Eagan residents last week accepted an invitation to vent about the cable giant before the City Council.
Residents began contacting the city after receiving a Comcast letter informing them they will have to pay $2 a month per TV for the adaptors that Comcast gave them at no cost two years ago. Anyone who wants to continue the digital channels they have sampled for free will pay $25 a year for one adaptor and $50 a year for two. Some worry that Comcast will pull the same kind of switch again with basic cable subscribers who will be required in mid-March to bring free adaptors into their homes to continue basic service. Up to now they have not needed special equipment for basic channels. But Comcasts conversion to all-digital signals requires all subscribers to have an adaptor of some kind.
(snip)
Until 2011, Eagan had the authority to regulate cable television rates because Comcast was the only cable franchise operator in the city. In 2007, Comcast petitioned the FCC to take away Eagans regulatory authority, arguing that it had effective competition from Dish Network and Direct TV because about 16 percent of Eagan residents subscribed to those services.
If at least 15 percent of a market has competitors, the FCC prefers to allow the competitive marketplace to set rate levels so, although Eagan and Burnsville opposed Comcasts petition, the FCC ended Eagans authority over rates in 2011. That ruling gives Comcast the right to set its own rates for service, converters, remotes, installation and service charges. Comcast raised prices in general in January and followed with notices about the adaptor boxes.
More
http://www.startribune.com/local/south/192741371.html
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)It's ridiculous.
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)Not that Direct TV is any better, just different and with more channels.
question everything
(47,487 posts)We really don't need all these channels, but we do like the history ones, so just watching networks show on line, and downloading movies from Netflix is not an alternative for us..
But, if they continue to raise prices and offer obnoxious services - I just hung up on someone - we may just do it.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)the digital providers. I'm nearly ready to take a hike anyway. I have a ROKU and Netflix, so cable is becoming obsolete for me.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Only they upped our rate by $10 a month for our 2nd TV. In response, we switched to their basic package. Payback is a fucker sometimes.