Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 01:21 PM Feb 2013

Conservatives Regret Taking Woodward’s ‘Threat’ Story Seriously

Now that the correspondence between Bob Woodward and the White House has been revealed as tame and cordial, conservative commentators are reacting with disappointment to the veteran journalist's claim that he was threatened over his sequestration reporting.

Politico on Thursday posted the emails between Woodward and White House economic adviser Gene Sperling, who told Woodward, "as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim."

"Looks like we were played," The Daily Caller's Matt Lewis wrote Thursday morning.

The rest: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/conservatives-regret-taking-woodwards-threat-story-seriously?ref=fpa

In the immortal words of Darth Vader, "Now his failure is complete."



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservatives Regret Taking Woodward’s ‘Threat’ Story Seriously (Original Post) WilliamPitt Feb 2013 OP
This is an example of why it is always good to confirm your story before believing it liberal N proud Feb 2013 #1
Just the name Bob Woodward sharp_stick Feb 2013 #2
He was a much better reporter ashling Feb 2013 #8
Indeed. Ed Suspicious Feb 2013 #9
Someone should have explained spooky3 Feb 2013 #3
So good to see them fact checking. Baitball Blogger Feb 2013 #4
Joe Scarborough will apologize first thing tomorrow...Bwahahaha....n/t monmouth3 Feb 2013 #5
Yeah, sure... Figaro78 Feb 2013 #16
Conservative commentat-ers deserve this. Over and over.... louis-t Feb 2013 #6
Let's say Woodward SHOT Sperling after he 'felt' threatened - RW bloggers would stay sided with him blm Feb 2013 #7
The hallmark of a good GOP rant against Obama.....facts are not necessary or required Sheepshank Feb 2013 #10
corollary: apologies are not necessary or required 0rganism Feb 2013 #14
It's by design Sheepshank Feb 2013 #18
And let's not forget there was a similar laundry list of outrage du jour about Bill Clinton JHB Feb 2013 #15
remember how soon they started after he was elected? 0rganism Feb 2013 #19
Lions watoos Feb 2013 #11
"Looks like we were played." Liberalagogo Feb 2013 #12
or, as Jabba the Hut would say--- BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2013 #13
Bob Woodward.. playing someone?! Cha Feb 2013 #17
Heh. Scurrilous Feb 2013 #20

liberal N proud

(60,336 posts)
1. This is an example of why it is always good to confirm your story before believing it
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 01:25 PM
Feb 2013

Multiple sources "reliable sources" helps.

Politico is not reliable!

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
2. Just the name Bob Woodward
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 01:25 PM
Feb 2013

is enough to still get most people to pay attention. Even though his reporting has steadily eroded into bad fantasy people will print what he says verbatim just because of who he is.

Hopefully this latest fiasco in an increasingly long string of fiasco's will reduce his ability to access people who matter.

spooky3

(34,458 posts)
3. Someone should have explained
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 01:27 PM
Feb 2013

To Bob that the words to watch out for are:

"Nice little claim you got there. Sure would be a shame if anything were to happen to it."

Bob just got confused.

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
6. Conservative commentat-ers deserve this. Over and over....
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 01:52 PM
Feb 2013

they refuse to check out stories before shooting their mouths off.

blm

(113,065 posts)
7. Let's say Woodward SHOT Sperling after he 'felt' threatened - RW bloggers would stay sided with him
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 01:53 PM
Feb 2013

and put all blame on Sperling, claiming Woodward was standing his ground.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
10. The hallmark of a good GOP rant against Obama.....facts are not necessary or required
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:26 PM
Feb 2013

They did this with the death panels
They are still doing it with HCR provisions
They did this with the birth certificate
They did this when trying to explain Obama's wild spending spree
They did this Obama's vacation time
They did this Obama golf time
They did this pretty much everything they could lay their hands on

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
14. corollary: apologies are not necessary or required
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:55 PM
Feb 2013

After being thoroughly discredited, just move onto something else, and expect the public to forget about it in a couple days.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
18. It's by design
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 04:57 PM
Feb 2013

the RW rants (for right or wrong) come so fast and so frequently, I this it's an effort at mass wallpapering to hide their own dirty walls.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
15. And let's not forget there was a similar laundry list of outrage du jour about Bill Clinton
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:56 PM
Feb 2013

They've been doing this literally for decades. For some (most? all?) of them, it's the only type of "journalism" they know.

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
19. remember how soon they started after he was elected?
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 05:01 PM
Feb 2013

IIRC the "haircut in the airport" outrage was their first major derangement.

 

Liberalagogo

(1,770 posts)
12. "Looks like we were played."
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:39 PM
Feb 2013

Of course....it's NEVAH, EVAH you right-wing f-nuts fault for not fact-checking and for being gullible fools.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Conservatives Regret Taki...