General Discussion

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts) Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:06 PM Feb 2013

The Interregnum begins.

Go with God Benedict!

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Interregnum begins. (Original Post) hrmjustin Feb 2013 OP

But Just Go, Please! MineralMan Feb 2013 #1

That sounds like a bodily function. Does it hurt? postulater Feb 2013 #2

It means the time between the reigns. hrmjustin Feb 2013 #6

Interpapem, you mean. kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #3

I used to correct term. hrmjustin Feb 2013 #4

You're going to get nothing but HappyMe Feb 2013 #5

I hope my response back was not snarky. hrmjustin Feb 2013 #7

No. HappyMe Feb 2013 #8

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)

1. But Just Go, Please!

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:14 PM

Feb 2013

postulater

(5,075 posts)

2. That sounds like a bodily function. Does it hurt?

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:53 PM

Feb 2013

Get better soon.

(and please turn on the fan when you leave)

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)

6. It means the time between the reigns.

Reply to postulater (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 04:05 PM

Feb 2013

It is the period between the papal reigns. They also use the term for the hour or so that the UK has no prime minister When they are changing PM's.

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)

3. Interpapem, you mean.

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:59 PM

Feb 2013

Grammar Nazis strike again!

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)

4. I used to correct term.

Reply to kenny blankenship (Reply #3)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 04:03 PM

Feb 2013

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)

5. You're going to get nothing but

Reply to hrmjustin (Reply #4)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 04:04 PM

Feb 2013

grief and snark here.

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)

7. I hope my response back was not snarky.

Reply to HappyMe (Reply #5)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 04:07 PM

Feb 2013

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)

8. No.

Reply to hrmjustin (Reply #7)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 04:09 PM

Feb 2013

I'm just mentioning that this may go south fast.

Reply to this discussion