Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 10:51 PM Feb 2013

LGBT People Will Receive First-Ever Domestic Violence Protections Under VAWA

LGBT People Will Receive First-Ever Domestic Violence Protections Under VAWA

By Katie Miller, Guest Blogger

Today, Congress finally voted to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, or VAWA, a traditionally bipartisan bill which provides assistance to victims of domestic violence. For the first time since the bill was first introduced in 1994, Congress allowed the Violence Against Women Act to expire at the end of 2012 because House Republicans opposed new provisions which would improve care and access to services for LGBT people and Native American women.

<...>

LGBT Americans face the roughly the same rate of domestic violence as their straight counterparts — one out of four to one out of three same-sex relationships has experienced domestic violence compared to one in every four heterosexual woman who will experience sexual violence in her lifetime. Moreover, nearly 62 percent of LGBT and HIV-positive victims were denied access to shelters in 2011, due in part to the unwillingness to accept gay men in these facilities. Additionally, authorities often lack the knowledge of how to handle domestic violence cases involving two people of the same gender. The current system fails to adequately address domestic violence in the LGBT community.

Here is how the progressive, newly improved Violence Against Women Act better protects LGBT people:

  • VAWA now contains a nondiscrimination clause that prohibits LGBT victims from being turned away from services like traditional shelters on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

  • VAWA now explicitly names LGBT people as an underserved population, which allows organizations serving LGBT victims of domestic violence to receive funding from a grant program that focuses specifically on underserved populations.

  • VAWA now allows states, at their discretion, to use certain grant funds to improve responses to incidents of domestic violence among LGBT people. This bolsters law enforcement, prosecution, and victim service efforts within states.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/02/28/1655541/lgbt-people-will-receive-first-ever-domestic-violence-protections-under-vawa/


Advocacy Orgs. Applaud House Passage of LGBT-Inclusive Violence Against Women Act
http://www.advocate.com/politics/2013/02/28/advocacy-orgs-applaud-house-passage-lgbt-inclusive-violence-against-women-act


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LGBT People Will Receive First-Ever Domestic Violence Protections Under VAWA (Original Post) ProSense Feb 2013 OP
Long past due! n/t Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #1
All it would take to speed progress: ProSense Feb 2013 #4
Easier said than done...but I keep trying. n/t Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #5
So glad this passed! thanks ProSense Cha Feb 2013 #2
I can understand yet not condone TlalocW Feb 2013 #3
They hate. Period. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #6
. libodem Mar 2013 #7
This is good! sheshe2 Mar 2013 #8
Good news! Scurrilous Mar 2013 #9
GOP Senate Prospects Voted Against VAWA ProSense Mar 2013 #10
This is great news! HappyMe Mar 2013 #11

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. All it would take to speed progress:
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 11:51 PM
Feb 2013

drastically shrink the Republican minority in the Senate and take back the House.

TlalocW

(15,384 posts)
3. I can understand yet not condone
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 11:08 PM
Feb 2013

Their position on LGBT being included. After all, this can be seen as another step - in a way - toward marriage equality, but what was their reasoning for not wanting to include Native American women? Yes, they're racist SOBs, but they can't very well say that.

TlalocW

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. GOP Senate Prospects Voted Against VAWA
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 09:26 AM
Mar 2013
GOP Senate Prospects Voted Against VAWA

The House finally voted to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act Thursday, but it may return as an election issue since several Republicans considered likely to run for the Senate in 2014 voted against the expanded version of the bill.

Here's a list of contenders, some more likely than others, who may have to explain their vote in a 2014 Senate bid (Rep. Paul Broun has already declared his bid for the open seat in Georgia):

Rep. Tom Cotton (AR)

Rep. Steve King (IA)

Rep. Bill Cassidy (LA)

Rep. John Fleming (LA)

Rep. Justin Amash (MI)

Rep. Michele Bachmann (MN)

Rep. Kristi Noem (SD)

Rep. Paul Broun (GA)

Rep. Tom Price (GA)

Rep. Phil Gingrey (GA)

Rep. Jack Kingston (GA)

Rep. Austin Scott (GA)

Rep. Tom Graves (GA)

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/gop-senate-prospects-voted-against-vawa


HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
11. This is great news!
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 09:33 AM
Mar 2013


Everybody should be able to marry if they wish. Everybody in a relationship should be protected.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LGBT People Will Receive ...