Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 11:39 AM Mar 2013

Making hundreds of thousands hungry or homeless: 'Brutal' or 'a pittance'?

Making hundreds of thousands hungry or homeless: 'Brutal' or 'a pittance'?

by Laura Clawson

Rand Paul and reality are going their separate ways when it comes to the effects of sequestration on the lives of Americans, particularly poor and vulnerable ones.

“President Obama proclaimed that the sequester’s ‘brutal’ and ‘severe’ cuts will ‘eviscerate’ America’s domestic spending,” Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, wrote in a recent article published by Investors.com. “But ‘eviscerate’ is not the adjective I would use; in fact, I believe the sequester is a pittance.”

The reality, meanwhile, is this:

King County in Washington State, which includes Seattle, stopped issuing new housing vouchers on Friday.

“Sequestration will result in some 600 fewer families in our local communities receiving crucial rental assistance over the next year,” Stephen Norman, the executive director of the county housing authority, said in a statement. “Because rents are so high, many of these families may, quite literally, find themselves out on the street.”

Nationwide, as many as 775,000 low-income women and children may lose WIC nutrition assistance, a program that produces a huge array of positive effects on children's health, including ones that cut health care costs. In the late 1980s, a study found that:

... every dollar spent on prenatal WIC participation for low-income Medicaid women in 5 States resulted in:

  • longer pregnancies; <...>

  • fewer infant deaths;

  • a greater likelihood of receiving prenatal care; and

  • savings in health care costs from $1.77 to $3.13 within the first 60 days after birth.
To Rand Paul, 775,000 women and children not receiving the aid that produces those results is "a pittance." Making 600 families at risk of homelessness in Seattle alone, and around 125,000 across the country, is "a pittance." Whose description do you think is more accurate? Paul's "pittance," or President Obama's "brutal" and "severe"?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/03/04/1191432/-Making-hundreds-of-thousands-hungry-or-homeless-Brutal-or-a-pittance



11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Making hundreds of thousands hungry or homeless: 'Brutal' or 'a pittance'? (Original Post) ProSense Mar 2013 OP
"To Rand Paul, 775,000 women and children not receiving the aid ..." Scuba Mar 2013 #1
Stuff like this ProSense Mar 2013 #5
Put me down as a vote for "brutal" n/t kdmorris Mar 2013 #2
This is just the beginning. They plan on starving millions. Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #3
Yes, but ProSense Mar 2013 #4
Apparently, they've never heard the phrase "bread riot". n/t winter is coming Mar 2013 #8
Think French Aristocrats...dim-witted not thinking the rabble would ever rise up... Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #10
k&r... spanone Mar 2013 #6
This is terrible! Do you know if the "housing vouchers" in Seattle Cha Mar 2013 #7
The GOP = anti-family. Rex Mar 2013 #9
The GOP = anti-life Amonester Mar 2013 #11
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
1. "To Rand Paul, 775,000 women and children not receiving the aid ..."
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 11:51 AM
Mar 2013

To Rand Paul, 775,000 women and children not receiving the aid that produces those results is "a pittance."



Fuck you Rand Paul.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. Stuff like this
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 06:13 PM
Mar 2013

isn't important enough to get a rise out of people. Hypothetical fear mongering by Rand Paul does, however.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
11. The GOP = anti-life
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 10:29 PM
Mar 2013

The GOP = anti-life for everybody except for those who give them big money.


That is all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Making hundreds of thousa...