Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 02:04 AM Mar 2013

Increase SS retirement age? Read this!

This is a point some of us have been trying to explain, finally there are some statistics. People may be living longer, but that does not mean that they will have the ability to work past 65?

The current SS retirement age is about 67 years.

The average years of healthy life in the US?

67.9 years!

So right now, social security is already set near the average age at which someone is in good health. Average. Which means about half are no longer in good health before they can retire.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21654536


How many healthy years will you live?

Ranking      Country    Years of healthy life    Life expectancy

17            USA      67.9                     78.2


Moving the retirement age to 70 would cause incredible hardship and poverty.




5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Increase SS retirement age? Read this! (Original Post) newthinking Mar 2013 OP
The GOP Will Move Retirement To 78 Just To Make Sure They Save Money TheMastersNemesis Mar 2013 #1
The repubs would move retirement GiveMeFreedom Mar 2013 #4
K&R... midnight Mar 2013 #2
Thanks for posting AceWheeler Mar 2013 #3
At DOL You Learn A Lot That The General Public Does Not Have Access To TheMastersNemesis Mar 2013 #5

AceWheeler

(55 posts)
3. Thanks for posting
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 02:32 AM
Mar 2013

I've been aware of this issue for a long time and done various online searches. There have been numerous studies about "quality of life" for older folks but couldn't find anything about health and mental status that would relate to job performance.

Of course, it does depend in part on the nature of work. It is my observation that those who've held jobs involving physical labor are the least able to continue working.

 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
5. At DOL You Learn A Lot That The General Public Does Not Have Access To
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 02:45 AM
Mar 2013

You learn a lot about occupations as an employment specialist. There is an entire field about work and labor analysis and compensation. Since Reagan all the methodologies have been scrapped and we have NO national labor policy anymore.

There used to be a Dictionary Of Occupational Titles that was scrapped. It was a job classification system that worked for over 40 years. It was used to help define training and compensation for every job in the economy. Now it is anarchy.

Careers in the Industrial and Service fields which are over 90% of the jobs in any economy are short lived by most standards. By 50 or 55 in most fields you are finished physically. In some cases it is shorter than that. Professional fields are less than 10% of the work force.

The general public does not understand that everyone will come to the time they cannot work even in professional fields. I worked in workman's compensation for 5 months and you would be surprised how many job injuries there are.

To be honest in some construction trades you cannot make it past 45. Firemen and policemen should be off the job by 55 for sure in most cases.

Finally, from where I sit the GOP has totally screwed up the entire job market and it may be now totally unrepairable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Increase SS retirement ag...