General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Bradley Manning Nobel prize nomination letter
Birgitta Jónsdóttir posted on her blog the letter which she and her friends in The Movement and Pirate Party sent to the Nobel committee, nominating Bradley Manning for the prize
Our letter to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee
1st of February 2013
... We have the great honour of nominating Private First Class Bradley Manning for the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize ...
Sincerely,
Birgitta Jónsdóttir, Member of Parliament for the Movement, Iceland
Christian Engström, Member of the European Parliament for the Pirate Party, Sweden
Amelia Andersdottir, Member of the European Parliament for the Pirate Party, Sweden
Margrét Tryggvadóttir, Member of Parliament for the Movement, Iceland
Þór Saari, Member of Parliament for the Movement, Iceland
Slim Amamou, former Secretary of State for Sport & Youth (2011), Tunisia
Two sentences caught my eye:
(1) "... The documents made public by WikiLeaks should never have been kept from public scrutiny ..."
Hmm ... Manning released about 250K US diplomatic cables. Most nations don't want their diplomatic correspondence read by outsiders, but these folk seem to believe the diplomatic pouch has no place in the world today. Soooo ... are Jónsdóttir, Tryggvadóttir, and Saari ensuring everyone around the world can read Iceland's diplomatic correspondence, and are Engström and Andersdottir ensuring that everyone around the world can read Sweden's diplomatic correspondence? Should I be shocked and surprised to learn that Iceland and Sweden still believe in the diplomatic pouch?
(1) "... We can already be reasonably certain that Bradley Manning will not have a fair trial ..."
Yeah, well, um .. Manning just pleaded guilty to a shizzload this week, without any promises from the prosecution. And he waived his right to a jury trial some time ago, opting instead simply to leave himself at the mercy of the judge. He must think his chances with the judge better than his chances with a jury; if there were any intent by command to deny him a fair trial, then command could certainly more easily influence one person thanseveral
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Sometimes I just do not understand why people flock to someone like this.
I could see people caring about John Walker Lindh for instance.
but whatever floats ones boat I guess.
Right to a fair trial? When he voluntarily decided he wants to spend at least 20 years in jail
before a trial, makes no sense for people to scream he can't get a fair trial.
Reminds me of people who defended the corrupt cop Dorner.
Daniel Ellsberg this guy is not. No matter that Ellsberg is reaping a new 15 minutes of fame
piggybacking off this issue. But it trivializes him too, sad to say he don't realize it.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)After all, the people on the committee conduct secret deliberations on the subject of to whom to honor. I'm sure, in the spirit of transparency, they would welcome having their communications obtained and released.
Why is anyone seeking to have such an organization - that conducts secret communications - give Manning an award?