General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Enough with the dynasties, and the centrist dems.
msongs
(67,438 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)that would be like trying to run Paul Wellstone (may he rip) on the same ticket as Rand Paul. Don't think so.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Not for Hillary, and my prediction is that she'll be the next president. But I think Elizabeth Warren's potential presidential aspirations (which I really hope she has!) would be better served by a longer tenure as a Senator than by a stint as Veep. In addition, while it pains me to say it, I'm not at all sure a two-woman ticket would poll well. We've "come a long way, baby," (both women and the nation), but we've still a ways to go.
Brother Buzz
(36,458 posts)That being said, I could be convinced to vote the ticket in the general election.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)most impressive background. First, we women have to show the public we can do it. Unfortunately it is too soon for two women. Warren could be a real plus in Hillary's cabinet.