Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:22 PM Mar 2013

Famed Watergate Reporter Is Losing His Marbles, Says Obama Should Threaten Iran More


Reader Supported News / By William Boardman

Famed Watergate Reporter Is Losing His Marbles, Says Obama Should Threaten Iran More
What's up with Bob Woodward's war-mongering?

March 9, 2013 |


When a veteran Navy intelligence analyst gets his knickers in a loud public twist over the number of U.S. nuclear-strike capable aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, one might first enjoy the spectacle – but then wonder: why such carryings-on to raise the military threat against Iran?

When the veteran Navy intelligence analyst turns out to be Bob Woodward, who has a national audience from his platform at the Washington Post, serious observors might well wonder what the motive for this misleading war-mongering might be (beyond apparent editorial policy at the Post).

But overt war-mongering quickly became a non-issue for most of what passes for the American journalistic intelligentsia, as twitter-heads of all persuasions were promptly distracted by the shiny objects of alleged and imaginary “threats” from the White House (gasp!). Finding the “threat” hidden in an apology failed to fool the mainstream media majority.

The actual news behind this empty-headed media kabuki about fake “intimidation” of the press was actually reported (and largely ignored) on February 6, when NBC ran with this false headline: “Navy to pull aircraft carrier from Persian Gulf over budget worries.” The text quickly revealed that the Navy wasn’t pulling an aircraft carrier from the Persian Gulf, it was simply NOT sending a second aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf, under a two-carrier policy ordered by Defense Secretary Robert Gates in 2010. ......................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/famed-watergate-reporter-losing-his-marbles-says-obama-should-threaten-iran-more



8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Famed Watergate Reporter Is Losing His Marbles, Says Obama Should Threaten Iran More (Original Post) marmar Mar 2013 OP
Well worth reading. pacalo Mar 2013 #1
I think 'losing his marbles' is, unfortunately, more likely. randome Mar 2013 #5
He’s old irrelevant and doesn’t give a shit. busterbrown Mar 2013 #7
This has always been the truth of Woodward MattBaggins Mar 2013 #2
Since when is a "reporter" a policy advocate? n/t UTUSN Mar 2013 #3
He's thinking it's his last shot at being a "war correspondent"? Ken Burch Mar 2013 #4
He isn't losing his marbles ... Zoeisright Mar 2013 #6
Exactly. Name one worthwhile or remotely useful thing Woodward has done since then BlueStreak Mar 2013 #8

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
1. Well worth reading.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:45 PM
Mar 2013

Woodward is carrying water for the neo-cons, no doubt.

The current non-deployment came just before scheduled seven-nation talks with Iran about nuclear issues.

Is the Obama administration threatening a peaceful approach to Iran?

No wonder Woodward is losing it.

MattBaggins

(7,904 posts)
2. This has always been the truth of Woodward
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:52 PM
Mar 2013

Everyone gave him a pass for supposedly "breaking" the Nixon scandals.

Bullshit. Woodward was chosen because he is such a Rube. He was the best useful idiot deepthroat could find. Just smart enough to get the story out; just dumb enough not to dig any deeper.

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
6. He isn't losing his marbles ...
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:19 PM
Mar 2013

they were lost a long, long time ago.

Plus, he rode on Bernstein's coattails. Woodward wouldn't know journalism if it bit him in the ass.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
8. Exactly. Name one worthwhile or remotely useful thing Woodward has done since then
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:44 PM
Mar 2013

Some things become perfectly obvious with the passage of time. The brains of that outfit was Carl Bernstein.

As far as I know, Bernstein has never commented on the bizarre behavior and statements made by the man who shared his by-line. I wonder what he really thinks whenever Woodward shoots off his mouth with some inane gibberish:

1) Just shut up, man. You are ruining our reputation.

2) Just keep talking. Every time you open your mouth, it makes me look that much better.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Famed Watergate Reporter ...