Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LVZ

(937 posts)
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 09:18 AM Mar 2013

Daylight Saving Time - an obsolete anachronism - why not a better way?

http://www.standardtime.com/proposal.html - ( 2 time zones, no daylight saving time )

The USA mainland is 2,700 miles wide. It has 4 time zones - Eastern, Central, Mountain, Pacific.

China is 3,200 miles wide. China has one time zone.
India is 1,900 miles wide. India has one time zone (reduced from two).

They both also seem to get along just fine without any DST adjustments.

Indonesia is 4,000 miles wide. It will change from 3 times zones to one time zone soon.
Brazil is 2,700 miles wide. Brazil is considering changing from 3 times zones to one time zone.



54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Daylight Saving Time - an obsolete anachronism - why not a better way? (Original Post) LVZ Mar 2013 OP
I love Daylight Savings Time. A time to rejuvenate. graham4anything Mar 2013 #1
I agree. Makes the summer evenings longer and JDPriestly Mar 2013 #51
(from link) two instead of four times zones and no daylight savings time - works for me. -- n/t Las Vegas Mixx Mar 2013 #2
Guessing you don't live on the east coast Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #3
I live on the East coast Tien1985 Mar 2013 #4
Actually, the east coast winter sunset/sunrise would stay at the same time muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #6
Ah - I just looked at the maps Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #7
Which would give Portland, Maine a December sunset of 3:04 pm muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #11
Leave DST alone. AngryOldDem Mar 2013 #5
So I am not the only one with a March 10 countdown? Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #8
It has been a CRUEL winter. AngryOldDem Mar 2013 #9
Well, move over and make room then... Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #20
You bet. I look forward to the time change every year. duffyduff Mar 2013 #13
Japan has no DST--and here's what happens Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2013 #37
But the "time" doesn't change dpbrown Mar 2013 #41
I should say, relative to the sunrise and sunset, time doesn't change dpbrown Mar 2013 #42
That's one thing that bothered me when I lived in Tokyo. subterranean Mar 2013 #52
I believe energy usage pipoman Mar 2013 #10
I get tired of people whining and complaining about it. duffyduff Mar 2013 #12
I'm with you dflprincess Mar 2013 #29
I'd rather have an hour in the morning dpbrown Mar 2013 #43
FYI. 'Obsolete anachronism' is terribly redundant. randome Mar 2013 #14
I fucking love it. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2013 #15
Why have any time zones? Everyone should just use UTC. ( n/t ) Make7 Mar 2013 #16
That would seem to make the most sense quakerboy Mar 2013 #46
Using UTC everywhere local hours would be more like the following... Make7 Mar 2013 #50
I can take or leave DST, but getting rid of time zones doesn't make much sense fishwax Mar 2013 #17
I agree with your point. tritsofme Mar 2013 #22
Oh, I know ... I was just drawing on the link from the OP fishwax Mar 2013 #25
I don't have a problem with the time zones. GoCubsGo Mar 2013 #18
I'm fine with the time zones, but DST is stupid. kudzu22 Mar 2013 #19
Indiana. MyshkinCommaPrince Mar 2013 #21
Personally, I wish we'd switch it to daylight savings time and Fawke Em Mar 2013 #23
Get rid of DST for the lower latitudes! burrowowl Mar 2013 #24
Standard time is the anachronism Warpy Mar 2013 #26
Energy Savings a Myth? - California Energy Commission study LVZ Mar 2013 #49
as a NY transplant to Florida HockeyMom Mar 2013 #27
I HEAR YOU HOCKEYMOM!!! Skittles Mar 2013 #53
Make DST standard. Dawson Leery Mar 2013 #28
The problem with that is... Bay Boy Mar 2013 #40
as long as the outcome is PERMANENT daylight savings time, I'm all in.... mike_c Mar 2013 #30
Keep it at four time zones, but make it DST year round. Terra Alta Mar 2013 #31
I don't quite get why DST is so terrible, but everyone COULD use GMT HereSince1628 Mar 2013 #32
Anything time related is a nightmare for big databases. Archaic Mar 2013 #33
I think it's more about northern versus southern latitudes magical thyme Mar 2013 #34
White House Petition to get rid of the time change Samjm Mar 2013 #35
China isn't "fine" with one time zone Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2013 #36
No, Russia eliminated 2 time zones in 2010 LVZ Mar 2013 #47
Keep the time zones, ditch the time change Samjm Mar 2013 #38
make it Daylight Savings Time year 'round.... chillfactor Mar 2013 #39
We don't get extra hours of daylight. Apophis Mar 2013 #48
Remember when Nixon did DST year round? LeftInTX Mar 2013 #44
I remember, a kid in my area got hit & killed by a car walking to school in the dark. nt Raine Mar 2013 #54
Sadly, this wouldn't work. AverageJoe90 Mar 2013 #45

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
3. Guessing you don't live on the east coast
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:52 AM
Mar 2013

Sorry, but 4:30 pitch black in December is fine for me. No desire to make that 3:30 while Nebraska can still see outside until 5:30.

It ain't broke, don't fix it.

Tien1985

(920 posts)
4. I live on the East coast
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:58 AM
Mar 2013

And I don't care what time they pick. Just pick a time and stay with it. I can use lights or curtains accordingly.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,320 posts)
6. Actually, the east coast winter sunset/sunrise would stay at the same time
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:07 AM
Mar 2013

because it would fix on the Eastern Standard Time.

The people affected in winter would be those in the Central and Pacific time zones. Sunrise in Bismarck, ND would be at 9:28 around Jan 1st. And 8:58 in Seattle.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
7. Ah - I just looked at the maps
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:10 AM
Mar 2013

Yeah, 9:30 in ND? While 'the world revolves around NYC' [sic], that is one good reason that isn't happening... So they drop us back an hour and everyone west suffers.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,320 posts)
11. Which would give Portland, Maine a December sunset of 3:04 pm
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:37 AM
Mar 2013

There are fairly good reasons for one hour time zones, as all this shows.

The OP talks about India and Brazil - those countries being closer to, or on, the equator, don't get short winter days (and a width measured in miles is also not so many degrees of longitude). For instance, of the 'extreme' Indian cities, all on the same time zone, Kolkata (Calcutta) in the east has an earliest sunset of 4:51, Amritsar in the north a latest sunrise of 7:30, and earliest sunset of 5:27, and Ahmadabad in the west latest sunrise of 7:20. Those are all pretty manageable.

The example of China shows what happens in a country further from the equator if you don't use time zones - Urumqi, in the north-west, has a latest sunrise of 9:44, and Harbin in the north-east an earliest sunset of 3:49.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
5. Leave DST alone.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:04 AM
Mar 2013

Dammit, I'm tired of going to work in the dark, and coming home in the dark. I'm tired of days where the light is measured in shades of gray.

This has been a particularly long and hard winter for me on many fronts. I have been looking forward to today since DST ended in November. Already the light looks different and I'm looking forward to warmer days, which to me is what DST signifies. It may not be the most scientific argument, but for some of us, it's just as valid.

I'm looking forward to maybe actually being able to do something **outside** after 5 p.m. this week.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
8. So I am not the only one with a March 10 countdown?
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:11 AM
Mar 2013

This winter has been darker than I have seen in years.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
9. It has been a CRUEL winter.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:17 AM
Mar 2013

We got spoiled by last winter, when the temperatures were more springlike, and summer started basically in March. (We paid for it during the summer with the drought, though.)

This year it's been snowier, and colder, and darker than I can remember in years. I honestly can't tell you when the last truly sunny day was. Plus, my job currently sucks, so that makes things that much harder. Any kind of hope for better days I can get right now, I'll take.

I just came back from a run, and it was the first pleasant time out I've had since before the time change in November. The light is different, things just FEEL different. It may be all in my head, but I do feel better today.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
20. Well, move over and make room then...
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 02:12 PM
Mar 2013

because its in my head today too.

Been on a massive cleaning jag today - and I don't know why. Normally Sundays I just sit and read, but today is gogogo time.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
13. You bet. I look forward to the time change every year.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 01:51 PM
Mar 2013

I just don't get the hostility by some with DST unless they are people who whine about the supposed "hour" they "lose" in the early morning.

The body gets used to the time change very quickly.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
37. Japan has no DST--and here's what happens
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 09:16 PM
Mar 2013

It starts to get light about two hours before anyone is ready to wake up, and it's pitch dark by the time you're through with dinner. Yuck.

dpbrown

(6,391 posts)
41. But the "time" doesn't change
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:27 PM
Mar 2013

People are forced by the government to get up an hour earlier. So instead of having people not 'ready to wake up' the government uses the ruse that, surprise, it's actually an hour later, so get up!

In the summer, people who wanted to get up early to enjoy the early sunrise could still do so. And it would be better for the early risers because all those people who were not 'ready' wouldn't be bothering them at tai chi or whatever.

I'm very anti-DST. Pick a time and stick with it.

dpbrown

(6,391 posts)
42. I should say, relative to the sunrise and sunset, time doesn't change
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:28 PM
Mar 2013

It's only because of the artificial interference that it seems to change.

subterranean

(3,427 posts)
52. That's one thing that bothered me when I lived in Tokyo.
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 02:13 AM
Mar 2013

Even in summer, the sun went down by 7:30, so there was usually little or no daylight left by the time I got home from work.

Every few years the Japanese government floats the idea of introducing daylight saving time, and just like their periodic proposals to relocate the capital, nothing ever comes of it.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
10. I believe energy usage
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:25 AM
Mar 2013

is a huge consideration. Times and timezones should be maximized so people use the least amount of electricity to light during waking hours. I'm not good with sunrise at 9am and sunset at 12am during the summer..If the US was going to 2 time zones, the logical choice would be central for the eastern half and mountain for the western half..

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
12. I get tired of people whining and complaining about it.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 01:50 PM
Mar 2013

I guess you don't care about the extra hour of daylight at the end of the day, but a lot of us love it.

Standard time sucks big time, especially in the winter when the days are short anyway.

dpbrown

(6,391 posts)
43. I'd rather have an hour in the morning
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:32 PM
Mar 2013

If I want to get up early, I should be able to choose that myself, instead of having the government force me to get up an hour earlier by pretending that time changed.

Make7

(8,543 posts)
16. Why have any time zones? Everyone should just use UTC. ( n/t )
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 02:00 PM
Mar 2013

[font style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ffffff;"]I'm not serious - there is a very good and logical reason for local time zones.[/font]

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
46. That would seem to make the most sense
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:49 PM
Mar 2013

Then you just adjust your operating hours to match the local needs. So where someone in nyc might work from 8 to 5, LA might instead have a work day that goes from 12-9.

But there's no conversion factor. And no need for "day light savings". Ive seen plenty of places that have seasonal hours.

Make7

(8,543 posts)
50. Using UTC everywhere local hours would be more like the following...
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 01:27 AM
Mar 2013

Last edited Mon Mar 11, 2013, 03:00 AM - Edit history (1)

... for your example of typical 8 am - 5 pm work hours:

[div style="margin-left:1em;"][div style="display:inline; font-size:1.1em; font-family:monospace; white-space:pre;"]City Typical work hours
[div style="display:inline; font-size:1.1em; font-family:monospace; white-space:pre;"]_____________________________________________

[div style="display:inline; font-size:1.1em; font-family:monospace; white-space:pre;"]London 08:00 to 17:00 ( 8 am - 5 pm)
[div style="display:inline; font-size:1.1em; font-family:monospace; white-space:pre;"]New York 13:00 to 22:00 ( 1 pm - 10 pm)
[div style="display:inline; font-size:1.1em; font-family:monospace; white-space:pre;"]Los Angeles 16:00 to 01:00 ( 4 pm - 1 am)
[div style="display:inline; font-size:1.1em; font-family:monospace; white-space:pre;"]Honolulu 18:00 to 03:00 ( 6 pm - 3 am)
[div style="display:inline; font-size:1.1em; font-family:monospace; white-space:pre;"]Tokyo 23:00 to 08:00 (11 pm - 8 am)
[div style="display:inline; font-size:1.1em; font-family:monospace; white-space:pre;"]Moscow 04:00 to 13:00 ( 4 am - 1 pm)
No time conversions necessary - everybody's clocks would be set to the same time.

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
17. I can take or leave DST, but getting rid of time zones doesn't make much sense
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 02:00 PM
Mar 2013

I see no compelling reason that Chicago, New York, and Dallas should have the same standard time, when their natural times are rather divergent.

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
25. Oh, I know ... I was just drawing on the link from the OP
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:12 PM
Mar 2013

which cites having those cities (plus Philadelphia) all on the same time as an advantage to getting rid of two time zones.

GoCubsGo

(32,084 posts)
18. I don't have a problem with the time zones.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 02:01 PM
Mar 2013

Two or four, either is fine with me. But, this switching on and off DST is bullshit. Arizona has it right, IMHO. Speaking of which, are we East Coasters 2 or 3 ahead of Arizona now? It's this kind of crap I hate, along with the time changes totally screwing up one's biological rhythms.

kudzu22

(1,273 posts)
19. I'm fine with the time zones, but DST is stupid.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 02:12 PM
Mar 2013

And even more stupid is the idea that the time we use for four months a year is called "standard time". I'd prefer to go back to the original switchovers for DST, or better yet scrap it altogether.

MyshkinCommaPrince

(611 posts)
21. Indiana.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 07:41 PM
Mar 2013

Here in Indiana, they didn't use DST until recently. Since it came into use, I've found that I prefer having more light in the evenings rather than the morning. But I'm a night person, I guess. I wouldn't mind getting rid of the DST scheme, however, if we just stopped switching back and forth and kept the evenings long. I find winters even more depressing than in the past, now that it starts getting darker an hour sooner all of a sudden, with the switchover.

I don't like the idea of getting rid of time zones, however. That just freaks me out.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
23. Personally, I wish we'd switch it to daylight savings time and
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 07:57 PM
Mar 2013

LEAVE IT THERE.

Not having much daylight at the end of the day causes depression.

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
26. Standard time is the anachronism
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:13 PM
Mar 2013

Daylight time was instituted to keep it light later in the evening, delaying energy use in households. It has worked well that way.

Want to increase global warming? Go to standard time year round.

LVZ

(937 posts)
49. Energy Savings a Myth? - California Energy Commission study
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 12:56 AM
Mar 2013
The California Energy Commission published a report, The Effect of Early Daylight Saving Time on California Electricity Consumption: A Statistical Analysis. According to the report, the extension of daylight saving time in March 2007 had little or no effect on energy consumption in California.

A California Energy Commission staff member released another report, Electricity Savings From Early Daylight Saving Time, in 2007. The report found there was no clear evidence that electricity would be saved from the earlier start to daylight saving time and that there was a chance that there could be a very small increase in electricity.
 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
27. as a NY transplant to Florida
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:16 PM
Mar 2013

the last thing I want is MORE sun and daylight. Give me the night and darkness.

Bay Boy

(1,689 posts)
40. The problem with that is...
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:04 PM
Mar 2013

...that delays sunrise to an unacceptable time, around 9am or so. And that seems unfair and possibly dangerous for school age kids.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
30. as long as the outcome is PERMANENT daylight savings time, I'm all in....
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:49 PM
Mar 2013

I love having the maximum possible number of daylight hours at the end of my work day, while also maintaining a sleep cycle connection to daylight working hours. I don't particularly care if it's dark or dawn when I start my day, but I much prefer to end it with several hours of daylight left for my own pursuits (as opposed to my boss's).

Terra Alta

(5,158 posts)
31. Keep it at four time zones, but make it DST year round.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:51 PM
Mar 2013

I get really depressed in the winter months when it starts getting dark at 5 o'clock. I'm not much of a morning person, so I don't mind the later sunrises.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
32. I don't quite get why DST is so terrible, but everyone COULD use GMT
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:54 PM
Mar 2013

A shift of 1 hour is really that devastating? Crykee, and people complained about the hypersensitivity of the pampered baby-boom

One universal time for coordinating meeting times, shift starts, train schedules etc certainly works. THe US military has coordinated global communication and activity for decades with that system.

Ya, sure, because humans seem to be diurnal people need to match their activity with regional patterns of daylight around something stable like the Zenith.

Oh SHIT!! I think just rediscovered why there are time zones!

Archaic

(273 posts)
33. Anything time related is a nightmare for big databases.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 08:58 PM
Mar 2013

It's an incredible amount of work to develop, test and deploy solutions when the time changes around.

If we're going to do it, we need to do it, and stop screwing with it. The last time we did it, extending it by two weeks on both ends was awful.

If you do anything that has time correlation in it, flipping an hour is bad enough. Did somebody go through that door at 2:00, only to have it show as 3:00AM? Did that wire transfer go through?

Pain
In
The
Butt!

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
34. I think it's more about northern versus southern latitudes
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 09:01 PM
Mar 2013

When I lived in PA, I never got the need for DST.

I first noticed this when I moved north to Mass, and now that I live in Maine, I desperately need the time changes. My body runs slightly ahead of schedule, so it's a huge relief when the clock change comes.

Without moving the clocks forward, by the summer equinox the sun would be rising at around 3am here, and would be worse, of course, for the far north. As it is, it rises around 4am and sets shortly after 9pm, enabling us to sleep a little longer in the morning and lighting the full day.

Without setting the clocks back in the fall, by the winter equinox my body would be begging to go to bed by 7pm. As it is, I struggle to stay awake. And the sun wouldn't be rising until 8am or later. A struggle to get up and head to work in a pitch black morning and a struggle to stay awake in the evening.

I seem to remember, too, that one reason for the time change in the fall is so that school kids aren't standing out in the dark to catch their school buses in the morning. They were getting hit by groggy commuters.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
36. China isn't "fine" with one time zone
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 09:12 PM
Mar 2013

Because the country should actually have three or four time zones (judging from what the neighboring countries have), people in Tibet who follow standard work schedules always have to wake up in the dark and have to go to bed while it's still light for much of the year.

All the countries you mention have wide swaths without much industrialization. It's like Alaska going to one time zone. Two of its former three time zones covered areas where hardly anyone lived: a little strip on the panhandle and Nome, a town of 500.

We'd end up more like China if we had one time zone. Imagine: even if we all went to Central Time, if you started work at 9AM, the West Coasters would be starting work at what was 7AM by the sun (before sunrise in the winter in the Pacific Northwest), and the East Coasters would start at what was 10AM by the sun. At equinox, the sun would set at 6PM for Midwesterners but at 5PM for Easterners and at 8PM for Westerners. If we didn't have a modern industrialized society, it wouldn't make any difference. If we had an interior consisting mostly of jungle like Brazil or islands that are completely non-industrialized like Indonesia, we could get away with it.

By the way, Russia is just fine with TWELVE time zones.

Samjm

(320 posts)
38. Keep the time zones, ditch the time change
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 09:30 PM
Mar 2013

I don't think we need to get rid of the 4 different time zones, it works just fine as it is. We live in such a 24 hour society today anyway that I don't think it makes much of a difference anymore. I was able to talk to both an EBay rep and a PayPal rep on the phone at 1am on Saturday morning to resolve an issue.

It's the time change twice a year that drives me insane, and is completely pointless. I grew up in a country that did not do a time change at all, and there was no issue with the time. It got dark earlier in winter, and later in summer. End of story. The idea of changing times is outdated and serves no purpose anymore.

chillfactor

(7,576 posts)
39. make it Daylight Savings Time year 'round....
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 09:59 PM
Mar 2013

I LOVE the extra hours of sunlight ... wish it for the winter months as well....I count down the days until Daylight Savings Time starts...and I so appreciated the extra hours of sunlight today..

 

Apophis

(1,407 posts)
48. We don't get extra hours of daylight.
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 12:27 AM
Mar 2013

Gah. This gets me every time. We have the same amount of daylight. The only difference is the time the sun rises and sets.

LeftInTX

(25,364 posts)
44. Remember when Nixon did DST year round?
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:47 PM
Mar 2013

Pictures in our yearbook of going to school in the dark. Sun was rising at 8:30. Little kids had to walk to school in the dark.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
45. Sadly, this wouldn't work.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:59 PM
Mar 2013

And, by the way, China does NOT get along just fine; there are many, many practical problems with this, and, in fact, was originally a purely political(and not in a good way!) measure:

http://www.wisegeek.org/why-does-china-have-only-one-time-zone.htm

It hasn't benefitted the vast majority of Chinese or Indians.....what makes you think we'll be any different?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Daylight Saving Time - an...