General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScientists say remains suggest Stonehenge started as graveyard
LONDON British researchers have proposed a new theory for the origins of Stonehenge: It may have started as a giant burial ground for elite families around 3,000 B.C.
New studies of cremated human remains excavated from the site suggest that about 500 years before the Stonehenge we know today was built, a larger stone circle was erected at the same site as a community graveyard, researchers said.
"These were men, women, children, so presumably family groups," said University College London professor Mike Parker Pearson, who led the team. "We'd thought that maybe it was a place where a dynasty of kings was buried, but this seemed to be much more of a community, a different kind of power structure."
Tale of two Stonehenges
Parker Pearson said archaeologists studied the cremated bones of 63 individuals, and believed that they were buried around 3,000 B.C. The location of many of the cremated bodies was originally marked by bluestones, he said. That earlier circular enclosure, which measured around 300 feet (91 meters) across, could have been the burial ground for about 200 more people, Parker Pearson said.
http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/10/17259834-scientists-say-remains-suggest-stonehenge-started-as-graveyard?lite
muriel_volestrangler
(101,355 posts)which is thought to be why the site was chosen in the first place. This is a fairly recent discovery, but not new for this year - from a NOVA 2010 program:
It picked up a series of mysterious grooves running beneath the avenue, for more than 200 yards. Parker Pearson was convinced these grooves were the remains of a manmade structure, older than the avenue.
His team opened a shallow trench to investigate.
MIKE PARKER PEARSON: I was convinced we were going to find evidence for gullies that contained vertical timber posts, something like that, and I was bitterly disappointed, because they were entirely natural.
NARRATOR: Soil specialists determined that these grooves were formed between two natural ridges in the landscape. During the last Ice Age, these ridges funneled rainwater and snowmelt between them. Yearly freezing and thawing caused the ground to crack into long deep grooves.
What makes the grooves extraordinary is that they are aligned with the solstices. On the winter solstice, they would have pointed directly at the spot where the setting sun touches the horizon.
CLIVE RUGGLES: Think about this coincidence in the landscape, the fact that you've got these natural stripes in the landscape actually aligning with the direction where the midwinter sun goes down. Yes, to us, it's a coincidence of nature, but imagine how that seemed to people whose mindset was different. It would have made it a very sacred and powerful spot. And that, for me, provides a very plausible reason why Stonehenge was constructed where it was.
NARRATOR: Prehistoric people built Stonehenge just beyond where the grooves end. Later, they enhanced the natural ridges with massive banks and extended the avenue all the way to the River Avon. Or so it was assumed.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/secrets-stonehenge.html
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 11, 2013, 07:02 AM - Edit history (1)
or is the title coincidental ? If it was then whole video is here and the opening sequence should provide an answer :
Opening sequence should provide an answer.
Must confess I never watch PBS. Whenever they've broadcast an entire series like The Dustbowl, Prohibition whatever I've just bought the DVD set instead.
edit to add : I've concluded it must be. Very good and well worth watching.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,355 posts)Last night's was on Channel 4 - covering much the same ground, I think, but a bit more up-to-date - they've analysed the cremated bones, which shows it was men, women and children, so not just a religious community or warrior burial, and think the bones from the feats show people came from all over Britain to them - from as far as the Orkneys.
http://www.channel4.com/info/press/news/analysis-of-63-ancient-human-remains-rewrites-the-story-of-stonehenge
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)I can check that on 4oD. http://www.channel4.com/programmes/secrets-of-the-stonehenge-skeletons/4od#3493817
(probably not viewable outside of the UK)
Since you mention the Orkneys - see also from last year :
'Discovery of a lifetime': Stone Age temple found in Orkney is 800 years older than Stonehenge - and may be more important
A 5000-year-old temple in Orkney could be more important than Stonehenge, according to archaeologists.
The site, known as the Ness of Brodgar, was investigated by BBC2 documentary A History of Ancient Britain, with presenter Neil Oliver describing it as the discovery of a lifetime.
So far the remains of 14 Stone Age buildings have been excavated, but thermal geophysics technology has revealed that there are 100 altogether, forming a kind of temple precinct.
Until now Stonehenge was considered to have been the centre of Neolithic culture, but that title may now go to the Orkney site, which contains Britains earliest known wall paintings.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2081254/Stone-Age-temple-Orkney-significant-Stonehenge.html#ixzz2NEQWsWeO
There's a documentary on that too which from memory discusses the possibility that those who built that later shipped off south and then built stone henge.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)"The seeds of our destiny, are nurtured by the roots of our past." - Dru & The Ids