Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 09:01 PM Mar 2013

Rand Paul and Pat Leahy Jointly File Bill to Reform Mandatory Minimum Sentences

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/mar/21/sens_leahy_paul_introduce_federa

Sens. Leahy, Paul Introduce Federal Mandatory Minimum Reform Bill [FEATURE]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) joined Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) in introducing legislation that would give federal judges greater flexibility in sentencing in cases where mandatory minimum sentences are involved. The bill, Senate Bill 691, also known as the Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013, would expand the "safety valve" to apply to all federal crimes.

Currently, the "safety valve" allows judges to impose a sentence below the mandatory minimum only in some drug cases. Only about 25% of federal drug offenders are currently able to take advantage of the "safety valve" to earn reduced sentences.

The bill comes as the federal government faces chronic budget crises and a federal prison population that has grown nearly 10-fold in the past three decades and by 55% since 2000. In 1980, there were some 25,000 federal prisoners; now there are more than 217,000, and almost half of them are drug offenders. At more than $7 billion this year, the federal prison budget now accounts for almost one-quarter of all Justice Department spending, and is up by $2 billion in the last five years alone.

The bill also comes amidst a rising hue and cry to move away from mandatory minimums. The non-partisan Congressional Research Service issued a January report that suggested that instead of expanding federal prison construction, Congress "could consider options such as modifying mandatory minimum penalties," as well as increased resort to probation, reinstating parole in the federal system, and "repealing federal criminal statutes for some offenses."

Similarly, the US Sentencing Commission surveyed federal judges in 2010 and found that 70% of the 600 judges who responded favored expanding the "safety valve" to all mandatory minimum sentences. Rising federal prison budgets and sentencing reform have also been a continuing concern for Chairman Leahy. He held hearings last summer on the issue, and now he has sponsored legislation to do something about it.

"As a former prosecutor, I understand that criminals must be held accountable, and that long sentences are sometimes necessary to keep criminals off the street and deter those who would commit violent crime," Sen. Leahy said. "Our reliance on mandatory minimums has been a great mistake. I am not convinced it has reduced crime, but I am convinced it has imprisoned people, particularly non-violent offenders, for far longer than is just or beneficial. It is time for us to let judges go back to acting as judges and making decisions based on the individual facts before them. A one-size-fits-all approach to sentencing does not make us safer."

"Our country's mandatory minimum laws reflect a Washington-knows-best, one-size-fits-all approach, which undermines the constitutional separation of powers, violates the our bedrock principle that people should be treated as individuals, and costs the taxpayers money without making them any safer," said cosponsor Sen. Paul. "This bill is necessary to combat the explosion of new federal criminal laws, many of which carry new mandatory minimum penalties."
_____________

I will give kudos to all sponsors of this bill.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rand Paul and Pat Leahy Jointly File Bill to Reform Mandatory Minimum Sentences (Original Post) Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 OP
Good, this needs to be done Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #1
We'll see if it moves. Leahy is the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, so that helps. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #2
Am I beginning to see a pattern with Rand Paul? sadbear Mar 2013 #3
Why do you say that? Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #4
Are most Federal crimes Inter-personal and violent crimes? cthulu2016 Mar 2013 #7
Kick for the late-night crowd. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #5
Good cthulu2016 Mar 2013 #6

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
3. Am I beginning to see a pattern with Rand Paul?
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 09:21 PM
Mar 2013

Inter-personal and violent crimes don't merit strict jail sentences, but property rights crimes do. I wonder if it's true?

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
4. Why do you say that?
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 10:24 PM
Mar 2013

It seems to me that Paul thinks there is too much federal law enforcement. I agree. And Leahy thinks mandatory minimums are stupid and cruel. I also agree.

Do you remember when people used to say "You don't have to make a federal case out of it"? We did. Why is some kid who caught got with five grams of crack on the street doing five years in the federal pen? We have more than 100,000 federal drug war prisoners. And we're spending $7 billion a year...

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
7. Are most Federal crimes Inter-personal and violent crimes?
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 03:57 AM
Mar 2013

Since this would expand judicial discretion to all federal crimes it's hard to see it as favoring one sort over another.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rand Paul and Pat Leahy J...