Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn Many Markets, Rail Beats or Competes With Air Travel
http://streetsblog.net/2013/03/22/in-many-markets-rail-beats-or-competes-with-air-travel/from StreetsBlog:
In Many Markets, Rail Beats or Competes With Air Travel
by Angie Schmitt
It can seem like the image of Amtrak as a second-rate mode a Soviet-style monopoly is so firmly ingrained that its hard to shake. Even as more people choose to ride trains.
Today at Network blog Better Institutions, Shane Phillips shares this graphic that shows how competitive Amtrak is in certain markets. Its amazing, given all the ways our political system undermines rail transportation, that it still manages to surpass air travel in some cases. But there are important reasons for that, he says:
Longer-distance intercity rail gets short shrift as a transportation mode in a lot of circles, often treated as more novelty than honest-to-god mobility solution. Air travel, on the other hand, is generally considered completely legitimate. In reality, even with relatively poor facilities by international standardsand massive federal investments in airport infrastructurerail is competitive with air travel in much of the United States, and in some cases vastly more popular as this chart illustrates.
This is good for everyone, airlines included. Air travel is an incredibly valuable and important transportation mode, but its utility is severely diminished at distances of 100-500 miles. A smaller share of total travel time is spent cruising in the plane; more is spent getting through security, waiting to board, taxiing, taking off, and landing. Rail is also easier to locate nearer the core of dense metro populations (where people usually ultimately want to go), something airlines cant really do with their huge geographical footprint and noisy planes. Where city-pair distances and populations warrant rail travel, pressure is taken off the airlines to provide these shorter, less profitable domestic routes. This then allows them to provide more international and longer-distance flights, improving airlines extremely thin profit margins and reducing overall airport congestion. Air travel is also much more polluting than railelectrified rail in particular.
Just imagine if these routes were prioritized the way highway development is.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 742 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Many Markets, Rail Beats or Competes With Air Travel (Original Post)
marmar
Mar 2013
OP
roody
(10,849 posts)1. Someone left out the time it takes to get to the airport.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)2. Du rec. Nt
Heywood J
(2,515 posts)3. Whatever happened to the auto-train?
I'd love to be able to go somewhere like California without having to put an extra 6,000 miles on the car, burn the cash in gas money, or get cavity-searched by a TSA worker.