Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

David Zephyr

(22,785 posts)
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:13 PM Mar 2013

Images of Nudity on the DU. Please provide a "Warning" for me, if no one else.

I am hardly a prude and anyone who knows me since 2001 knows that.

But I really hope that overtly religious threads and threads postings of nude (male or female) photos might be done on another forum other than the General Discussion Forum. Sometimes one may need to make a point with such images, I get that. I'm cool with it. Just please post an alert so I can skip it.

Opening an OP and confronting photos of people's junk without warning is a bit much.

I'm not asking for a hard and fast rule, just some consideration, that's all.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Images of Nudity on the DU. Please provide a "Warning" for me, if no one else. (Original Post) David Zephyr Mar 2013 OP
There are potential serious workplace consequences Newsjock Mar 2013 #1
Remember that the employer has many ways of knowing what you are doing at your desk undeterred Mar 2013 #2
And generally, they don't care and they're totally cool with it Newsjock Mar 2013 #4
+1 HuckleB Mar 2013 #8
I think there are probably some employers who would not want their employees undeterred Mar 2013 #11
well you are supposed to be working while at work datasuspect Mar 2013 #32
I look at Democratic Underground on my lunch hour. IrishEyes Mar 2013 #34
What about surfing during lunch?... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2013 #35
Ah, a 'WARNING'. When I first read your subject line I thought you wanted us to send an 'alert' Tx4obama Mar 2013 #3
Thanks Tx4obama. I will edit my OP. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #6
NSFW (not safe for work) should be in the subject line. It's not worth losing one's job! freshwest Mar 2013 #22
I swore off checking DU from work back in '06... Mister Ed Mar 2013 #38
Very good suggestion, especially for a work situation. I could see in my RKP5637 Mar 2013 #5
Link? Turbineguy Mar 2013 #7
Link bahrbearian Mar 2013 #12
Me and my big mouth.... Turbineguy Mar 2013 #15
And me and my stupid clicking finger! nt Union Scribe Mar 2013 #41
Another gun show thread. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2013 #16
It is obnoxious of her not to include a warning. Renew Deal Mar 2013 #17
Well said David. Cleita Mar 2013 #9
Thanks, Cleita. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #29
Many employers now run software allowing them to view a computer screen along w/employees Melinda Mar 2013 #10
1. NSFW is standard on any forum I ever went to so that folks don't get fired Benton D Struckcheon Mar 2013 #36
You're right - and some sites (ie; reddit) actually require posting ALL nudity in the NSFW section Melinda Mar 2013 #37
It said there were nude people. Apophis Mar 2013 #13
Did it say with/pics bahrbearian Mar 2013 #18
Nope. winter is coming Mar 2013 #21
The words "naked protest" and "public nudity" should give it away. Apophis Mar 2013 #23
It could been a written article bahrbearian Mar 2013 #43
NSFW (not safe for Work) warning would be appreciated. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #28
Yeah, I'm fine with that idea. Really. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2013 #14
Right On , it cuts down on the search. bahrbearian Mar 2013 #19
Don't use your work computer for personal use and you will never have a problem. Easy. idwiyo Mar 2013 #20
I own my own businesses. My issue is common courtesy of warning people. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #26
Nothing wrong with your request. I was giving you a general advice. idwiyo Mar 2013 #27
This thread is useless without photos R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #24
You know a lot of people are going to open this topic hoping for the best. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #25
Personally I don't care nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #30
I feel the same way. Don't want to see it and won't click on a NSFW thread. forestpath Mar 2013 #31
DU threads should be assumed to not be r rated dsc Mar 2013 #33
You should turn off images in your browser. bananas Mar 2013 #39
I agree with you. Le Taz Hot Mar 2013 #40
While I agree with you, most requests for a warning are because "I'm at work". talkingmime Mar 2013 #42
Another vote for warnings in post titles. kiva Mar 2013 #44

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
1. There are potential serious workplace consequences
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:17 PM
Mar 2013

I opened up one of these threads at work today. It doesn't matter a bit what I think of nudity of any gender; it matters what HR thinks.

Someone could lose their job by reading one of these threads when it's unlabeled.

Liberation, freedom, equality, yes. But we also all know that, especially in this screwed-up economy, the employer rules.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
2. Remember that the employer has many ways of knowing what you are doing at your desk
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:19 PM
Mar 2013

other than someone walking by and seeing a picture. If you are viewing or posting on Democratic Underground during business hours on your work computer they know it.

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
4. And generally, they don't care and they're totally cool with it
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:21 PM
Mar 2013

But breasts and penis x50 are over the line. And as strongly as I might feel about liberation, it's not the battle that I want to fight when it comes to staying employed.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
11. I think there are probably some employers who would not want their employees
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:26 PM
Mar 2013

spending work time on a messageboard called "Democratic Underground".

IrishEyes

(3,275 posts)
34. I look at Democratic Underground on my lunch hour.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 11:18 PM
Mar 2013

I eat lunch at my desk. My boss doesn't care if I surf the web on my lunch hour. However, I would feel uncomfortable if someone walked by my cubicle and saw naked people. I'm careful to not open anything labeled not safe for work until I get home.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
3. Ah, a 'WARNING'. When I first read your subject line I thought you wanted us to send an 'alert'
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:20 PM
Mar 2013

... on someone's OP.

The word WARNING is a bit less confusing

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
22. NSFW (not safe for work) should be in the subject line. It's not worth losing one's job!
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:47 PM
Mar 2013

I never surfed the net at work, so didn't have that danger, but it seems that a lot of people do. We can be considerate and I don't think it's prudish or any form of censorship to ask be considered. We can do it.



Mister Ed

(5,934 posts)
38. I swore off checking DU from work back in '06...
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:21 AM
Mar 2013

...after I clicked on an innocently-titled post and got a giant, explicit hard-corn porn photo depicting fellatio. I'd have been fired if that were seen, and rightly so. An employer has a legal and moral obligation not to allow an employee to create a hostile or uncomfortable workplace for others.

So yeah, I'm long done with DU at work, whether it's my lunch hour or not. But posters should try to remember that their fellow DU'ers may have jobs - or kids - to protect.

RKP5637

(67,109 posts)
5. Very good suggestion, especially for a work situation. I could see in my
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:21 PM
Mar 2013

Last edited Sat Mar 30, 2013, 08:31 AM - Edit history (1)

career where this could have presented possibly a potential problem. Same here, I'm not even remotely a prude.

Renew Deal

(81,860 posts)
17. It is obnoxious of her not to include a warning.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:34 PM
Mar 2013

Someone could lose their job over her reckless post.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. Well said David.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:24 PM
Mar 2013

I agree. There are just some things all of us don't want to see. A warning would be nice.

Melinda

(5,465 posts)
10. Many employers now run software allowing them to view a computer screen along w/employees
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:26 PM
Mar 2013

I know mine does, and I know many here in my part of CA that do as well. Viewing anything which shows nudity can be grounds for job dismissal where I work. No doubt its the same for countless others.

A simple courtesy can make a HUGE difference - thanks for posting this thread.

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
36. 1. NSFW is standard on any forum I ever went to so that folks don't get fired
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 11:57 PM
Mar 2013

2. I actually wrote a program more than twenty years ago that allowed the owner of the company I work for to see exactly what his sales force was seeing on their screens. This has been around a LONG time. Assume it's what your employer does.

Melinda

(5,465 posts)
37. You're right - and some sites (ie; reddit) actually require posting ALL nudity in the NSFW section
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:09 AM
Mar 2013

as well as other forms of expression not necessarily suitable either.

Good post, sound advice. I hope your words are heeded by many, and thanks for the reinforcement.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
28. NSFW (not safe for Work) warning would be appreciated.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:26 PM
Mar 2013

But hey, I realize this will never happen. Next thread I will violate my own rules and alert as NSFW.

I am not a prude, I could care less, I work at home...but this could get people fired.

I guess it's ok, whatever point was not made.... :rolleyes:

David Zephyr

(22,785 posts)
26. I own my own businesses. My issue is common courtesy of warning people.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:23 PM
Mar 2013

You are free to shock, I'm not requesting a rule, just the common courtesy.

I do understand the point that others have made here regarding their work computers and it is a valid point. Why should they forfeit coming to the DU out of concern for their jobs?

Why should a parent or grandparent feel they need to hide their computer screen when they read the DU?

It's a request for a courteous notification or warning. That's all, nothing more. What's wrong with that?

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
27. Nothing wrong with your request. I was giving you a general advice.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:26 PM
Mar 2013

It's always a very bad practice to mix work with personal. Sooner or later it will backfire. YMMV.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
30. Personally I don't care
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 10:31 PM
Mar 2013

But it could get people fired, so a NSFW warning should automatically go in. Until today I never considered we needed such a warning, but in some places those photos cud be seen as soft porn.

Personally combat boots are the problem, but hey...NSFW should be like standard here.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
33. DU threads should be assumed to not be r rated
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 11:03 PM
Mar 2013

without a warning as to their r rating. That really isn't a huge thing to ask.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
39. You should turn off images in your browser.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 02:37 AM
Mar 2013

Video forum thumbnails are on the frontpage. I've posted femen videos, sometimes the thumbnails show breasts, nothing I can do about that.

LBN requires the exact title, we're not allowed to put NSFW in the subject line.

You should turn off images in your browser.

Even then, Skinner started a thread titled "FUCK", it was on the home page and greatest page.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
40. I agree with you.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 05:30 AM
Mar 2013

I find it disturbing that people have to challenge you on your simple request for courtesy.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
44. Another vote for warnings in post titles.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:06 AM
Mar 2013

And yes, I've seen lots of threads that have 'naked' or 'nude' in the title that don't have pictures and are fine to open in a public setting - work or whatever.

As for 'fuck' or other words in the title, if someone is that close to me or paying that much attention to what I'm opening, then I hope they are shocked.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Images of Nudity on the D...