General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestions for an Expert on North Korean Propaganda
<snip>
To find out how the current campaign looks to an expert on North Korean propaganda, The Lede contacted B. R. Myers, a North Korea analyst at Dongseo University in the South Korean port city of Busan. Mr. Myers, who spent eight years studying the nations propaganda for his book The Cleanest Race: How North Koreans See Themselves and Why It Matters, answered questions from The Lede on Friday via Gchat. Below is a transcript of the complete conversation, edited for clarity. (The Lede also added links to some of what Mr. Myers wrote, for the benefit of readers who want to know more about the historical context.)
<snip>
The rhetoric itself has not escalated significantly over last year. And its been almost 20 years since North Korea first talked of turning Seoul into a sea of fire. I get the feeling that North Koreas long-range missile launch and the nuclear test have both lent a new force to the old rhetoric.
Q.
Is the impression we get via these Web videos similar to what they broadcast on television, and what you see in other forms, or are we in the news business guilty of hyping the most inflammatory material do you think?
A.
Thats a good question. We need to keep in mind that North and South Korea are not so much trading outright threats as trading blustering vows of how they would retaliate if attacked. The North says, If the U.S. or South Korea dare infringe on our territory we will reduce their territory to ashes, and Seoul responds by saying it will retaliate by bombing Kim Il-sung statues. And so it goes. I think the international press is distorting the reality somewhat by simply publishing the second half of all these conditional sentences. And I have to say from watching North Koreas evening news broadcasts for the past week or so, the North Korean media are not quite as wrapped up in this war mood as one might think. The announcers spend the first 10 minutes or so reporting on peaceful matters before they start ranting about the enemy.
The regime is exploiting the tension to motivate the masses to work harder on various big first-economy projects, especially the land-reclamation drive now under way on the east coast. Workers are shown with clenched fists, spluttering at the U.S. and South Korea, and vowing to work extra hard as a way of venting their rage.
<snip>
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/29/the-internet-loves-kim-jong-un-gags-but-what-does-north-koreas-propaganda-mean/
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Nice to have another point of view on this.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)The JSA. It's the front line in all of this.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)elleng
(130,956 posts)'North and South Korea are not so much trading outright threats as trading blustering vows of how they would retaliate if attacked. . .
the North Korean media are not quite as wrapped up in this war mood as one might think. The announcers spend the first 10 minutes or so reporting on peaceful matters before they start ranting about the enemy.'
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)It's like people have to reinvent the goddamn wheel every time this crap comes up again.
I thought you were talking about Spitfire!
cali
(114,904 posts)mainer
(12,022 posts)I was getting tired of all the "hey, let's put on a war!" talk.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)I thought you had questions for someone else.
Sid