... we can be damned sure the MSM won't find space for it.

Now, about that recount in Wisconsin: what's up with Waukesha County?

thanks BradBlog

makes it sound like Colbert-Busch is supporting unverifiable election machines.
I suggest editing your text to say "Voting for Colbert's system will take place on 100% unverifiable machines," or something similar.

Since you mentioned it, I've read the headline now several times to try and read it as you did. So far, no luck. Doesn't sound like I'm suggesting she's in favor of it or against it, for that matter.)

???

"Stephen Colbert's Sister Will Run for U.S. House on 100% Unverifiable Voting Machines in SC"

A candidate doesn't run on a machine. She runs on a platform of positions and voters cast ballots on voting machines.

See your point when you explain it that way. Though, obviously, I had to have that reading of it explained to me to read it that way!

With that said, it pretty much seems like the first graf clears up any confusion on that point, no? (Along with the rest of the piece?)

It's just the beginning that isn't.

that means real success whey you reach 100%
All selections should be so easy...

you don't even need to vote. The election's already been decided.

responsible for 100% unverifiable voting machines is now our new Secretary of Defense.

.

...as nite's in the full article. The ES&S system is notorious for failure in election after election.