General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDems fear Obama Social Security cut will haunt them in 2014 races
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/293703-dems-fear-obamas-social-security-cut-will-haunt-them-in-2014Dems fear Obama Social Security cut will haunt them in 2014 races
By Mike Lillis - 04/14/13 06:00 AM ET
A growing number of House Democrats are concerned that President Obama's proposal to cut Social Security benefits will haunt the party at the polls in 2014.
Although Democrats have long-championed the retirement program, they say Obama's plan to reduce payments for future beneficiaries through a chained consumer price index (CPI) has weakened their stance and opened the door for Republicans to vilify the president.
The leader of the campaign arm for House Republicans, Rep. Greg Walden (Ore.), on Wednesday called Obamas plan a "shocking attack on seniors."
Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), the former head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said Walden's comments foreshadow a line of attack the GOP will use on the campaign trail next year. It's a reason, he added, for Democrats to worry.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)Divided government and obstruction might just fit the 1%'ers agenda nicely.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)But it would require Dems to take a more militant and left populist line. IOW, run AWAY from Obama and his neo-liberal policies in all areas, INCLUDING this Social Security cut. This would inspire, not only the base, but also the 50% or so of registered voters who don't vote because they don't think that anybody in DC actually represents them. More participation equals more Democratic voters. But it probably won't happen.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"But it would require Dems to take a more militant and left populist line. IOW, run AWAY from Obama and his neo-liberal policies in all areas, INCLUDING this Social Security cut. This would inspire, not only the base, but also the 50% or so of registered voters who don't vote because they don't think that anybody in DC actually represents them. More participation equals more Democratic voters. But it probably won't happen."
...would require "chess."
ProSense
(116,464 posts)become more toxic than it currently is?
Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), the former head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said Walden's comments foreshadow a line of attack the GOP will use on the campaign trail next year. It's a reason, he added, for Democrats to worry.
<...>
"I don't underestimate the degree to which they'll be disingenuous," Rep. Mark Takano (Calif.), a freshman Democrat who has emerged as one of the loudest critics of Social Security benefit cuts, said Friday. "It harkens back to the charge that $700 billion was taken from Medicare and put into ObamaCare, and [they] told all the seniors it was a [benefit] cut. That was very deceptive, [and] this is another instance of that."
Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), another staunch defender of Social Security, echoed that charge Friday.
"I never underestimate Republican hypocrisy," he said.
Not all Democrats fear Obama's chained CPI proposal will be a liability for the party during the midterms. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, argued that the president proposed the change, so any political fallout should be directed at him...Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), another fierce critic of chained CPI, offered another reason he thinks GOP attacks on Obama's budget wont stick: Republicans, he said, have crusaded for similar entitlement cuts for too long to reverse course convincingly.
I love this!
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)...Democratic candidates in 2014 can embrace. But "damage control" is always an admission that the likelihood of damage, if not actual damage itself, has increased. Democrats are wise to take this danger seriously and to put as much distance between the Chained CPI and themselves as possible heading into the mid term elections.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Certainly, there are damage control measures, hopefully effective ones, that..."
...I don't see this as "damage control." Like Ellison said, this is the President's proposal. They never supported it.
No one is going to hold their representatives accountable for a policy they never supported. It will be a policy suggested by the President and rejected by Congress.
Also, Republicans have no credibility on the issue. The 2010 formula is unlikely to work again.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)n/t
99Forever
(14,524 posts)This will haunt them and likely kill any chance at gains in the House and even open the possibility of losing the Senate.
It's called reality.