Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat should be made of the ideological peers of the attacker(s)?
Those who resort to violence obviously need to be dealt with but what about those who simply share an indeological confederacy?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1038 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What should be made of the ideological peers of the attacker(s)? (Original Post)
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
OP
Depending on the ideology. If the ideology IS hurting and killing innocent people, then they
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#1
Unless there is a direct incitement to violence I don't think there's much a free society can do.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#4
No crime has been committed ... otherwise, it will be thought police and predicted guilt.
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#5
Nothing, I guess. What would we do? Why would we do it? What purpose would it serve?
TheKentuckian
Apr 2013
#6
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)1. Depending on the ideology. If the ideology IS hurting and killing innocent people, then they
are involved in hate crimes, aren't they? But to share an ideology of anti-government is everyone's right, as long as it doesn't include the furtherance of violence as a solution or method to combat it, I guess.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)2. Nothing. nt
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)3. Dunking chair. If they survive they are innocent.
Why don't you share your view?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)4. Unless there is a direct incitement to violence I don't think there's much a free society can do.
This might sound crazy but I'm kinda keen on a free society.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)5. No crime has been committed ... otherwise, it will be thought police and predicted guilt.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)6. Nothing, I guess. What would we do? Why would we do it? What purpose would it serve?