Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
Mon Apr 15, 2013, 09:47 PM Apr 2013

Steve Kornacki's "lean forward" ad..WTF?

"...covering things that were not safe to cover on tv before.."...

safe? what's that all about?

Somehow it WAS safe to describe in graphic detail the president's genitalia...and to show the "stain" on the "blue dress"..

It must have been unsafe to tell us details about how bankers pillaged our treasury, and drained our 401-k's/pensions.. Why was it "unsafe", Steve?

Is it safe now??? Now that the money is gone and they are going after that last leg of the stool (SS), and they are somehow above prosecution?? Is it safe now??

Melissa Harris Perry got rampaged for her innocent comment about how children "belong" to all of us, but so far no one (except maybe me) has questioned why it was "not safe" to cover some things before..

Was MSNBC afraid that bankers would storm 30-Rock and stamp them all NSF??



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steve Kornacki's "lean forward" ad..WTF? (Original Post) SoCalDem Apr 2013 OP
To take one example dsc Apr 2013 #1
Wasn't safe? Doesn't mean it wasn't covered... immoderate Apr 2013 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Steve Kornacki's "lean fo...