Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReuters: FBI Interviewed One Of The Suspected Boston Marathon Bombers In 2011
Reuters: FBI Interviewed One Of The Suspected Boston Marathon Bombers In 2011
In 2011, the FBI interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the older of the two brothers suspected in the Boston Marathon bombings who was killed in a shootout with police Tursday night, Reuters reports:
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/reuters-fbi-interviewed-one-of-suspected-boston-marathon
In 2011, the FBI interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the older of the two brothers suspected in the Boston Marathon bombings who was killed in a shootout with police Tursday night, Reuters reports:
The source said the FBI's dealings two years ago with Tamerlan Tsarnaev occurred following a request from an unidentified foreign government.
The FBI did not produce any "derogatory" information on Tsarnaev and agents then put the matter "to bed," said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/reuters-fbi-interviewed-one-of-suspected-boston-marathon
Wonder if they read him his Miranda rights before that interview?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1289 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reuters: FBI Interviewed One Of The Suspected Boston Marathon Bombers In 2011 (Original Post)
ProSense
Apr 2013
OP
LisaL
(44,973 posts)1. Since he was not under arrest, why would they read him his Miranda rights?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Then maybe they could
"Since he was not under arrest, why would they read him his Miranda rights?"
...just chat with him now, and then arrest him in a couple of days.
DOJ Official: No Miranda Rights For Boston Bombing Suspect Yet
A DOJ official explains why Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzokhar Tsarnaev has not been read his Miranda rights.
"The suspect is en route to the hospital for immediate treatment," the official tells TPM's Sahil Kapur. "But we plan to invoke the public safety exception to Miranda in order to question the suspect extensively about other potential explosive devices or accomplices and to gain critical intelligence."
The public safety exception allows law enforcement officials to question suspects briefly in a legally admissable way prior to providing Miranda rights in cases of terrorism or when the public might face imminent threat.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/doj-official-no-miranda-rights-for-boston-bombing
A DOJ official explains why Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzokhar Tsarnaev has not been read his Miranda rights.
"The suspect is en route to the hospital for immediate treatment," the official tells TPM's Sahil Kapur. "But we plan to invoke the public safety exception to Miranda in order to question the suspect extensively about other potential explosive devices or accomplices and to gain critical intelligence."
The public safety exception allows law enforcement officials to question suspects briefly in a legally admissable way prior to providing Miranda rights in cases of terrorism or when the public might face imminent threat.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/doj-official-no-miranda-rights-for-boston-bombing
One thing is certain, this interview will turn out a lot different from the previous one.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)3. No. They really couldn't interview him now. He is dead.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)4. Sorry, I meant his brother.
You're right, the other brother is dead.
Still, the point stands.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)5. I don't understand why this is an issue...two words:
Zacarias Moussaoui
ProSense
(116,464 posts)6. Because
"I don't understand why this is an issue...two words:"
...now that the suspect is caught, it's time to return to proving that it's Obama who is a threat to civil liberties.
Constitutional law already permits law-enforcement officials to question a suspect in custody, without Miranda warnings, if public-safety considerations justify doing so. For at least 25 years, it has been clear that law enforcement does not have to provide Miranda warnings before asking a suspect questions that, as the Supreme Court has put it, are reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety. Thus, if the FBI captures a suspected terrorist bomber, and has grounds for concern that other attempted bombings might be in motion, the FBI can non-coercively interrogate the suspect for information about those other suspected plots without giving the suspect Miranda warnings. One crucial consequence is that any statements the suspect makes during that questioning that also incriminate himself can be used against him in a later criminal prosecution.
Yet the Court has recognized and elaborated the public-safety exception in cases unlike many of today's terrorism cases, and thus the boundaries of the exception in the terrorism context remain unclear. When the FBI or other government agencies capture a terrorist suspect, they will often want to question him or her for two related, but different kinds of purposes: (1) for information that will protect the public against any immediate security threats and (2) for more general intelligence about others who might have assisted the suspect in the (completed or attempted) act of terrorism for which he has been apprehended, about the nature and organization of the terrorist groups he or she is associated with (if any), and the like. While the public-safety exception permits pre-Miranda questioning for the first purpose, how that exception applies to this second purpose is far from clear.
- more -
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/05/should-congress-codify-public-safety.html
Yet the Court has recognized and elaborated the public-safety exception in cases unlike many of today's terrorism cases, and thus the boundaries of the exception in the terrorism context remain unclear. When the FBI or other government agencies capture a terrorist suspect, they will often want to question him or her for two related, but different kinds of purposes: (1) for information that will protect the public against any immediate security threats and (2) for more general intelligence about others who might have assisted the suspect in the (completed or attempted) act of terrorism for which he has been apprehended, about the nature and organization of the terrorist groups he or she is associated with (if any), and the like. While the public-safety exception permits pre-Miranda questioning for the first purpose, how that exception applies to this second purpose is far from clear.
- more -
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/05/should-congress-codify-public-safety.html
The first purpose is definitely how this is being applied.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2719600