Take what they print with a grain of salt, at least.

None. Not Fox News, not the New York Post. They publish crap more often than other outlets, but not always.

Individual articles should be criticized if they are crap. Good articles from generally bad sources should not be criticized.

Not to mention that right wing sources are not welcome here.

That may sound sarcastic, but I am serious. In other parts of the world, it is sometimes hard to know for certain. I wish I had an easy way to know.

is news.

are lies and sensationalism.

where are the lies ?

a real good. But as a news source - they are as you say unreliable and sensationalist - and one might add - right wing and frequently racist.

Here is one example but there are many others.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021032740

positive and when you leave a comment that is pro Obama it never gets posted. I very seldom read it any more.

Here is a thread posted by Mr Blur and some others from the UK forum in 2007. Although some of the images are no longer available, it gives the idea.

They have always been hateful toward immigrants and minority groups; but recently they have been carrying out a truly vile campaign against people on disability benefits:

http://www.daa.org.uk/index.php?mact=Blogs,cntnt01,showentry,0&cntnt01entryid=385&cntnt01returnid=98

http://www.update.org.uk/news-detail.php?page=97

In addition, they give very sensational misleading reports on science. They have been described as dividing all objects into those that cause cancer and those that cure it. They were the biggest British promoters of the 'vaccines cause autism' propaganda, and thus bear a share of the responsibility for the current measles outbreak.