Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 05:25 PM Apr 2013

After Boston, we should put Muslims under surveillance, says Rep. King

Despicable bigot, Peter King, wastes no time.

President Obama cautioned the nation not to rush to judgment about the Boston Marathon bombers. But that’s not stopping Republican Rep. Peter King.

King, who chairs the House subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, is urging authorities to beef up their surveillance of Muslims in the U.S. following Friday night’s arrest of bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

Police must “realize that the threat is coming from the Muslim community and increase surveillance there,” the New York lawmaker told National Review.

King—who spearheaded controversial hearings on the radicalization of Muslim-Americans in 2011—also told CNN that “we can’t be politically correct. I think we have to see, has radicalization extended into the Chechen community?”

<snip>

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/04/20/after-boston-we-should-put-muslims-under-surveillance-says-rep-king/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Boston, we should put Muslims under surveillance, says Rep. King (Original Post) cali Apr 2013 OP
Right atreides1 Apr 2013 #1
This is how he gets his wackadoo credentials back BeyondGeography Apr 2013 #2
That's not news, he said the same thing before Boston tularetom Apr 2013 #3
Just knowing that this idiot tomg Apr 2013 #4
Disgusting janlyn Apr 2013 #5
Why didn't we put all white males under surveillance after McVeigh? HipChick Apr 2013 #6
But why? Politicalboi Apr 2013 #7
Republican Catholic raised white males, in particular. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #12
Why don't we put all congressmen who say dumb things under surveillance? undeterred Apr 2013 #8
That's what the press is for!!! n/t Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #14
Maybe we could require Muslims to sew Moons and stars on their clothing. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2013 #9
Because they all think alike? winter is coming Apr 2013 #10
And then Wiccans. And then Buddhists. And then Unitarians. kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #11
Or maybe college students who wear $900 shoes? Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #13
and supporters of the IRA neverforget Apr 2013 #15

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
1. Right
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 05:40 PM
Apr 2013

This from the man who for years spoke in defense of the IRA...maybe he should be placed under surveillance, because I don't believe his claims of changing his mind!!!

janlyn

(735 posts)
5. Disgusting
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 06:22 PM
Apr 2013

It is sick the way he,along with Graham and McCain are using this tragedy to feed the ignorant base of their voters.
After their announcement that the youngest brother should not be tried in a court of law,nothing surprises me anymore!
I have to believe that they are aware if what is constitutional and legal. So I can only conclude that these pigs in suits are using this tragedy for their own political ends.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
9. Maybe we could require Muslims to sew Moons and stars on their clothing.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 06:57 PM
Apr 2013

Yellow is a nice color for that sort of thing. And, maybe put them in certain parts of towns to make surveillance easier...

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
11. And then Wiccans. And then Buddhists. And then Unitarians.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 07:03 PM
Apr 2013

First they came for the Muslims.........

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
13. Or maybe college students who wear $900 shoes?
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 07:05 PM
Apr 2013

And have no visible means of subsistence?

Yes, this appears to have been motivated by radical Islamic doctrine, but geeze.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After Boston, we should p...