Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 10:56 AM Feb 2012

Legal ruling could see introduction of airline 'fat tax'

The ruling, made today by the Court of Appeal, could also prevent passengers with a disability from seeking compensation from their airline if they receive unsatisfactory or inconsistent treatment during a flight.

In the cases of Christopher Stott v Thomas Cook and Tony Hook v British Airways, it was ruled that key elements of Britain’s disability and discrimination laws do not apply once passengers have boarded an aircraft.

The cases involved two wheelchair users who sued their airlines after they were unable to sit next to their carers on board a flight. Both subsequently suffered “embarrassing” incidents.

But both cases were dismissed after the court ruled that the Montreal Convention, a framework of international rules and regulations on air travel, should take precedence over British law.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/9066658/Legal-ruling-could-see-introduction-of-airline-fat-tax.html

Wouldn't that be true in the US as well? Don't international treaties take precedence over US laws and regulations?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Legal ruling could see in...