Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:19 PM Feb 2012

Was Karen Handel hired to be a scapegoat for the Komen Foundation?

I was reading her resignation letter and the following stood out:

I am deeply disappointed by the gross mischaracterizations of the strategy, its rationale, and my involvement in it. I openly acknowledge my role in the matter and continue to believe our decision was the best one for Komen’s future and the women we serve. However, the decision to update our granting model was made before I joined Komen, and the controversy related to Planned Parenthood has long been a concern to the organization.


* emphasis mine

What better way to roll out a controversial decision than to hire someone staunchly anti-choice/anti-PP and when the decision to defund PP goes sideways, blame the new hire. I may be seeing a plot where there isn't one but hiring her now makes a ton of sense.
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was Karen Handel hired to be a scapegoat for the Komen Foundation? (Original Post) justiceischeap Feb 2012 OP
Considering Ari Fleischer acted as consultant to identify someone for the job? hlthe2b Feb 2012 #1
I'm certainly not shedding tears justiceischeap Feb 2012 #2
why? She shared their agenda... She wanted and was determined to destroy Planned Parenthood. hlthe2b Feb 2012 #5
Maybe I'm not making myself clear on why it's unfair and mean justiceischeap Feb 2012 #7
No I think it was more like an attempted infiltration that went bad. unapatriciated Feb 2012 #12
Sure, I could easily see it that way. Quantess Feb 2012 #13
Not an "innocent new hire" izquierdista Feb 2012 #3
I believe she was actually head-hunted by Ari Fleischer (which says enough in itself) justiceischeap Feb 2012 #6
Now you know what we put up with to live here izquierdista Feb 2012 #17
Ditto visiting Savannah! OriginalGeek Feb 2012 #23
+1 nt MADem Feb 2012 #10
I'm still not convinced she's not completely full of shit. OriginalGeek Feb 2012 #4
I acknowledge that I may be seeing something that isn't there justiceischeap Feb 2012 #8
Wasn't there an internal email or two leaked? OriginalGeek Feb 2012 #24
I think she was hired to be the lead hatchet woman. MADem Feb 2012 #9
All I'm suggesting is that if what Handel is saying is true justiceischeap Feb 2012 #11
If? izquierdista Feb 2012 #18
So she's lying to specifically throw Komen under the bus? justiceischeap Feb 2012 #19
Anyone who goes back to Komen at this point is an idiot. MADem Feb 2012 #22
I don't think so. I think they thought they'd get away with it, MineralMan Feb 2012 #14
No. I think that's an unnecessarily convoluted theory. Orangepeel Feb 2012 #15
Not really. I think they were counting on Komen's defunding combined with the House investigation... backscatter712 Feb 2012 #16
What jumped out at me was this: MicaelS Feb 2012 #20
I think as people keep digging into this, we're going to find out justiceischeap Feb 2012 #21
"...by ditching another aspect of women's health? " DCKit Feb 2012 #26
Of course, that claim is extremely self-serving... JHB Feb 2012 #27
Irrelevant. Now she's a victim of the vast left wing conspiracy. DCKit Feb 2012 #25

hlthe2b

(102,283 posts)
1. Considering Ari Fleischer acted as consultant to identify someone for the job?
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:22 PM
Feb 2012

You betcha. Though I'll shed no tears for this hateful opportunist.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
2. I'm certainly not shedding tears
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:26 PM
Feb 2012

but if there is any basis in truth to my hypothesis, that says more about Komen than Handel. I have no love for Handel but if she was used as a scapegoat, that really sucks and, honestly, is quite mean.

hlthe2b

(102,283 posts)
5. why? She shared their agenda... She wanted and was determined to destroy Planned Parenthood.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:29 PM
Feb 2012

She said as much. She may have been a patsy when things turned sour, but I fail to see why she should earn any sympathy.

(And if you don't think Fleischer clued her into why she was potentially going to be hired, think about it a bit more)

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
7. Maybe I'm not making myself clear on why it's unfair and mean
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:37 PM
Feb 2012

Take politics out of it for a moment... what if you were hired with the impression you were going to spearhead something really important to you. Then you get there and this thing you were hired to do is actually an excuse to make you the bad guy.

Again, I have absolutely NO SYMPATHY for Handel, none but I will reiterate, this says more about the Komen Foundation than Handel. We all know where Handel stood in regards to choice and PP, yet the decision by Komen obviously shocked a lot of people. So much so, their brand will be forever tarnish, if not ruined. I will repeat, yet again, that says more about Komen than Handel.

I think she got screwed, otherwise she wouldn't have thrown Komen under the bus. If she knew her role, she would have been told to play along, not point out the decision was made BEFORE she came aboard. Where's the win in that for her?

unapatriciated

(5,390 posts)
12. No I think it was more like an attempted infiltration that went bad.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:49 PM
Feb 2012
Before Handel’s hiring, Komen’s lobbying shop was staunchly Democratic — from its head to its hired guns, former Democratic aides did most of the heavy lifting on everything from the breast cancer stamp to breast cancer research to its advocacy on the health care bill. And when their lead lobbyist, former Democratic staffer Jennifer Luray, quietly left in 2010, she took with her a six-figure severance package not in keeping with an employee that just found a new job.



http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/02/komen-foundation-ousted-their-democratic-lobbyist-just-before-hiring-karen-handel/

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
13. Sure, I could easily see it that way.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:51 PM
Feb 2012

She was "on board with them", so to speak. They hired Handel knowing full well what she was about. But she ended up taking all the heat and ended up getting burned, while SGKF ducked for cover. I can see why Handel would be upset about this.

 

izquierdista

(11,689 posts)
3. Not an "innocent new hire"
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:27 PM
Feb 2012

You're obviously NOT from Georgia, or you would have know of this witch and her right-wing crusades. More likely, she found some strings to pull so she could elbow her way into the Komen organization, so she could push an agenda that she couldn't as Secretary of State. In her failed run for governor here, all of this was well known, and she got the usual Bachmann-Santorum contingent of religious crazies supporting her.

I think it is an insight into the executive level of the Komen foundation. They have now been shown to be true conservatives, willing to let the Christian crackpot demographic have their say. If they were liberal and concerned with helping women, her resume would have immediately hit the trash can.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
6. I believe she was actually head-hunted by Ari Fleischer (which says enough in itself)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:30 PM
Feb 2012

so I don't think there was string-pulling going on. I think, based on the head-hunting by Fleischer and the subsequent resignation letter pointing out the decision was made BEFORE she was hired, it's easy to conclude she is a scapegoat. I wouldn't be surprised is she sues.

And no, I'm not from Georgia, I refuse to live in another red state again (nothing against Georgia, I'd love to visit Savannah at some point).

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
23. Ditto visiting Savannah!
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:10 PM
Feb 2012

My wife's cousin used to live in Savannah and we had great times visiting him every year. I miss that guy. She has folks we love to visit near Warner Robbins too. Hell, I like some of her relatives better than mine.


I'm just waiting for the call: "Y'all come - pig's in the ground!"
and I can start to smell that BBQ before we even hit the state line...

sorry. didn't mean to sidetrack the thread - I just love visiting up there.

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
4. I'm still not convinced she's not completely full of shit.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:28 PM
Feb 2012

"The decision to update...was made before I joined..."
Ok, they decided to take a look at how and to whom they made grants.

But did they pick on PP before she was hired? She never said she was not the one who named them to be on the chopping block.
They decided to look at their process. They hired her. She said, "fuck poor women" and the rest is history...


I have a hard time believing anything she said in her resignation letter wasn't specifically designed to spin shit her way.

I think my theory can fit into OP's theory as well....at the "they hired her" part, they had to know who she was and figured she would make that move...

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
8. I acknowledge that I may be seeing something that isn't there
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:40 PM
Feb 2012

and I don't deny she doesn't hold low-income women in high regard. That said, if she was part of the larger picture, why throw Komen under the bus in the resignation letter? If you're a repub team player, you don't stab the team in the back on the way out.

For all we know, she could be lying because she's pissed for being made to resign but I don't see the logic in that if she was brought in specifically to make this decision. It just doesn't fit with the repub model of being a team player.

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
24. Wasn't there an internal email or two leaked?
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:15 PM
Feb 2012

I thought I read yesterday or the day before something on that..It would be nice if whoever leaked them would send a few more out to help clarify what is being said in private vs what she says in public...


and how did the resignation letter get to the press? Is that normal? It was addresses to Brinker right? Is that automatically a press release or did someone cc the press?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. I think she was hired to be the lead hatchet woman.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:44 PM
Feb 2012

She couldn't have done a damn thing without the express consent of Susan's sister, Miz Brinker, and the board of directors, though.

I think it was a match made in hell--and it didn't work out, so now everyone's pointing fingers.

Screw Komen--I would not give a flung bucket of poop if they started supporting progressive charities exclusively at this stage of the game. They only give twenty four cents of every dollar they take in to "the cause" and the rest goes to bloated salaries of mendacious, duplicitous asswipes.

They are permanently on my Shitlist!

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
11. All I'm suggesting is that if what Handel is saying is true
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:48 PM
Feb 2012

this should be made known to people who may go back to supporting Komen now that Handel is gone.

I think there were all kinds of machinations going on in the background... I think Handel was hired specifically to be thrown under the bus if this didn't work. I think Komen is more concerned about a political agenda than breast cancer.

I just don't want people thinking that now Handel is gone, things are hunky dory.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
19. So she's lying to specifically throw Komen under the bus?
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:05 PM
Feb 2012

Okay.

I think she's giving us a view behind the curtain, myself. Sour grapes and all. I don't think she's lying about Komen making this decision before she was brought in... I think that's why their Dem lobbyist was fired, because she didn't agree with the decision.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
22. Anyone who goes back to Komen at this point is an idiot.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:10 PM
Feb 2012

When you look at their financials, they're just full of shit. They aren't helping women, they're helping THEMSELVES. I've rarely seen a charity that puts so little of their actual "take" towards the actual cause they are touting. The main "cure" they are interested in is a cure for not being a millionaire for their board of directors and leadership.

They're rip-off artists.

Send the cash to PP. More of it will go to women who need it.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
14. I don't think so. I think they thought they'd get away with it,
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:54 PM
Feb 2012

and she'd be in charge of their "triumph." It didn't work out that way, thank goodness.

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)
15. No. I think that's an unnecessarily convoluted theory.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:57 PM
Feb 2012

She may be the fall guy for implementation of a plan they all shared, but I don't see any reason to assume she was hired to be that. They hired her because she wanted to do what they wanted done. It turned out to be a bad idea, poorly implemented, and Handel and Komen are both paying the price.

She'll fall upward, though, with some other cushy right wing job.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
16. Not really. I think they were counting on Komen's defunding combined with the House investigation...
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:57 PM
Feb 2012

to discredit Planned Parenthood and force it to go the way of ACORN, but they got a hoist with their own petard.

DAMN, Karen Handel makes the most satisfying "THUMP-THUMP" sound as she's thrown under the bus...

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
20. What jumped out at me was this:
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:06 PM
Feb 2012
However, Komen’s decision to change its granting strategy and exit the controversy surrounding Planned Parenthood and its grants was fully vetted by every appropriate level within the organization. At the November Board meeting, the Board received a detailed review of the new model and related criteria. As you will recall, the Board specifically discussed various issues, including the need to protect our mission by ensuring we were not distracted or negatively affected by any other organization’s real or perceived challenges. No objections were made to moving forward.


Was the entire board this stupid to think that a charity founded on women's health was not stepping into a firestorm by ditching another aspect of women's health?

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
21. I think as people keep digging into this, we're going to find out
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:08 PM
Feb 2012

just how deep this decision goes. There's all kinds of nastiness in her resignation, that if true, really does not bode well for Komen.

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
26. "...by ditching another aspect of women's health? "
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 07:55 AM
Feb 2012

Komen wasn't funding abortion services, and they damn well knew it.

PP also does screening, testing and organizes treatment for breast cancer. It's not Jiffy Lube.

Thousands of women who can't afford to go to a private doctor or hospital depend on PP for a majority of their healthcare. With our shitty, profit-driven system, alternatives are few and far between.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
27. Of course, that claim is extremely self-serving...
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 07:58 AM
Feb 2012

Not that I have any other real information at hand, it just reeks of martyr-posing.

Didn't someone at Komen resign over that decision?

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
25. Irrelevant. Now she's a victim of the vast left wing conspiracy.
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 07:50 AM
Feb 2012

She's going to become a barnacle on the MSM circuit until she wins either a governorship or a Congressional seat. Barring either of those, a permanent post at Faux and a regular on the Sunday talk shows.

Personally, I think she's such a hateful person, moderate (R)s will turn away from her in droves. With that kind of exposure, she won't be going to either the governors mansion or Congress.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was Karen Handel hired to...