We, collectively and by agreement provide an environment, infrastructure and the manpower for those who acquire wealth to do so.

Then, wealth tells us they are the providers and job creators. They grab the bag, (and to me it is somewhat like a petulant child who won't share toys) and say, MINE! Nyah!

That works so well, ey? The problem that is brewing may be that the effects of that rather pathological, (never enough and need for control) approach is that, within the confines of their affluent denials and delusions, they can be insulated from the growing threat of the potential results, i.e,, environmental and sociological.

They, (at least those not in the very tip of the .01%) should be becoming more uncomfortable about this "libertarian", neo-Liberal amassing of wealth and inequity. That is, if they plan to continue to live and move amongst those whom are impacted by their trustifarian arrogance, hubris and ideas of manifest destiny. They may fail to see what some consider an interconnectedness; which is obvious in the sense of the environment and hypothetically true at various levels and to various degrees, socially.

The wealthier amongst us are going to have to "sequester" themselves, more and more, or change the way they are playing the game.