Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Wed May 8, 2013, 05:20 PM May 2013

A $3.00 per year device that could help save up to 2 million lives per year.....

Every 20 seconds, a child dies from a water-related illness. A research group in India has developed a portable water filtration system that creates 10 liters of clean water in about an hour. Nanoparticles in the filter remove heavy metals and biological hazards. The device could help save up to 2 million lives per year.

More info: http://bit.ly/17KD2jc


Found on the I Love Fucking Science Facebook

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A $3.00 per year device that could help save up to 2 million lives per year..... (Original Post) Playinghardball May 2013 OP
K&R Sherman A1 May 2013 #1
The need for water purification is just going to increase siligut May 2013 #2
looks like what I have hanging on the side of our pool snooper2 May 2013 #3
Anyone from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation lurking here? KamaAina May 2013 #4
What is that supposed to mean? Buzz Clik May 2013 #5
That looks like good bang for the buck KamaAina May 2013 #7
Whew. Yes, I agree. Buzz Clik May 2013 #9
He spends 2 billion a year trying to wipe out polio. FSogol May 2013 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #22
And there are those who see him as a demigod. I figure both views are necessary, for balance. nomorenomore08 May 2013 #14
Mephistopheles not Satan MattBaggins May 2013 #21
True, but there's a resemblance. Buzz Clik May 2013 #23
ftr, read all about Gates' philanthropy. babylonsister May 2013 #13
so what will they do with the contaminated filters at the end. article ignores this issue nt msongs May 2013 #6
At least it only generates one set of 2 disposable filters a year. Kablooie May 2013 #18
The device's cost is comparable to other filtration devices. Robb May 2013 #8
You're right, in that efficiency is just as important. nomorenomore08 May 2013 #15
How about some numbers to back up your claim? GeorgeGist May 2013 #16
It does seem a merchandise "fix" to an infrastructure problem n/t Scootaloo May 2013 #24
K&R! gateley May 2013 #11
More people die from sulphurdunn May 2013 #12
That's actually why beer became popular KamaAina May 2013 #17
I saw a TED talk about a similar device Orrex May 2013 #19
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #20
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
7. That looks like good bang for the buck
Wed May 8, 2013, 05:42 PM
May 2013

they do a lot of work fighting diseases like malaria in the developing world. They could afford enough of these for everybody.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
9. Whew. Yes, I agree.
Wed May 8, 2013, 05:53 PM
May 2013

There are those who consider Gates to be the human incarnation of Satan.

This would be an excellent project for the Gates Foundation to fund.

FSogol

(45,529 posts)
10. He spends 2 billion a year trying to wipe out polio.
Wed May 8, 2013, 06:04 PM
May 2013

According to NPR, there were less than 300 cases last year. The problem areas limited to Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Nigeria.

Response to FSogol (Reply #10)

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
14. And there are those who see him as a demigod. I figure both views are necessary, for balance.
Wed May 8, 2013, 07:53 PM
May 2013

And that the truth, as usual, is somewhere in the middle.

babylonsister

(171,094 posts)
13. ftr, read all about Gates' philanthropy.
Wed May 8, 2013, 06:41 PM
May 2013

And yes, he has his critics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates



Philanthropy

Gates with Bono, Queen Rania of Jordan, former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, President Umaru Yar'Adua of Nigeria and others during the Annual Meeting 2008 of the World Economic Forum in Switzerland
Further information: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Gates began to appreciate the expectations others had of him when public opinion mounted suggesting that he could give more of his wealth to charity. Gates studied the work of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, and in 1994 sold some of his Microsoft stock to create the William H. Gates Foundation. In 2000, Gates and his wife combined three family foundations into one to create the charitable Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which is the largest transparently operated charitable foundation in the world.[76] The foundation allows benefactors access to information regarding how its money is being spent, unlike other major charitable organizations such as the Wellcome Trust.[77][78] The generosity and extensive philanthropy of David Rockefeller has been credited as a major influence. Gates and his father met with Rockefeller several times, and modeled their giving in part on the Rockefeller family's philanthropic focus, namely those global problems that are ignored by governments and other organizations.[79] As of 2007, Bill and Melinda Gates were the second-most generous philanthropists in America, having given over $28 billion to charity.[80] They plan to eventually give 95% of their wealth to charity.[81]

The foundation was at the same time criticized because it invests assets that it has not yet distributed with the exclusive goal of maximizing return on investment. As a result, its investments include companies that have been charged with worsening poverty in the same developing countries where the Foundation is attempting to relieve poverty. These include companies that pollute heavily, and pharmaceutical companies that do not sell into the developing world.[82] In response to press criticism, the foundation announced in 2007 a review of its investments, to assess social responsibility.[83] It subsequently canceled the review and stood by its policy of investing for maximum return, while using voting rights to influence company practices.[84] The Gates Millennium Scholars program has been criticized for its exclusion of Caucasian students.[85][86]

Gates's wife urged people to learn a lesson from the philanthropic efforts of the Salwen family, which had sold its home and given away half of its value, as detailed in The Power of Half.[87] Gates and his wife invited Joan Salwen to Seattle to speak about what the family had done, and on December 9, 2010, Gates, investor Warren Buffett, and Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook's CEO) signed a promise they called the "Gates-Buffet Giving Pledge", in which they promised to donate to charity at least half of their wealth over the course of time.[88][89][90]

In March 2013, Bill Gates offered a US$100,000 grant through his foundation for a condom design that "significantly preserves or enhances pleasure" to encourage more males to adopt the use of condoms for safer sex. The grant information states: “The primary drawback from the male perspective is that condoms decrease pleasure as compared to no condom, creating a trade-off that many men find unacceptable, particularly given that the decisions about use must be made just prior to intercourse. Is it possible to develop a product without this stigma, or better, one that is felt to enhance pleasure?” The project has been named the "Next Generation Condom" and anyone who can provide a "testable hypothesis" is eligible to apply.[91]

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
18. At least it only generates one set of 2 disposable filters a year.
Thu May 9, 2013, 12:22 PM
May 2013

That's not a huge amount of waste for a family of 4.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
8. The device's cost is comparable to other filtration devices.
Wed May 8, 2013, 05:49 PM
May 2013

The filter is apparently less expensive.

Most drinking water shortages stem from poor irrigation and sewage inadequacies. Shipping 30 million manufctured devices around the world has an attractive simplicity to it, but for the cost of shipping you could run a system of pumps that could transform water use in a particular area -- replacing flood and channel irrigation with pipes and pumps can cut consumption by 90%.

However, cool nanotechnology.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
15. You're right, in that efficiency is just as important.
Wed May 8, 2013, 07:58 PM
May 2013

I do wonder why more aid money isn't spent on building sewage systems, or upgrading inadequate ones. Maybe the problem simply appears too daunting?

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
17. That's actually why beer became popular
Wed May 8, 2013, 11:49 PM
May 2013

millennia ago, brewed water was safer than fresh. Not to mention tastier. And more fun.

Response to Playinghardball (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A $3.00 per year device t...