Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sun May 12, 2013, 05:51 PM May 2013

Leaving Bangladesh? Not an easy choice for brands

Leaving Bangladesh? Not an easy choice for brands

NEW YORK (AP) — Bangladesh offers the global garment industry something unique: Millions of workers who quickly churn out huge amounts of well-made underwear, jeans and T-shirts for the lowest wages in the world.

But since a building collapse April 24 killed at least 1,100 garment workers in Bangladesh in one of the deadliest industrial tragedies in history, the country has gone from one of the industry's greatest assets to one of its biggest liabilities.

"The risk factors have jumped off the charts," said Julie Hughes, president of the U.S. Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel, a trade group that represents retailers who import garments. "This is worse than what anyone had imagined."


...

The rising death toll may force Western brands to make a choice: Stay and work to improve conditions. Or leave and face higher costs, similar or worse worker conditions in other low-wage countries and criticism for abandoning a poor nation where per-capita income is just $1,940 per year.

Most retailers have vowed to stay and promised to work for change. Wal-Mart and the Swedish retailer H&M, the top two producers of clothing in Bangladesh, have said they have no plans to leave. Other big chains such as The Children's Place, Mango, J.C. Penney, Gap, Benetton and Sears have said the same.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/leaving-bangladesh-not-easy-choice-brands

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Leaving Bangladesh? Not an easy choice for brands (Original Post) The Straight Story May 2013 OP
The very least the retailers can do moondust May 2013 #1
The technical term for this I learned on Krugman's blog: Hoocoodanode? Fumesucker May 2013 #2
So things will basically stay the same. nt Raine May 2013 #3

moondust

(19,986 posts)
1. The very least the retailers can do
Sun May 12, 2013, 06:22 PM
May 2013

is build and maintain safe work environments so the impoverished people they are shamelessly exploiting don't have to risk their lives every day just going to work to SEW.

But then, circumventing OSHA and safe building codes in the U.S. is a big reason they are in places like Bangladesh in the first place.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
2. The technical term for this I learned on Krugman's blog: Hoocoodanode?
Sun May 12, 2013, 06:26 PM
May 2013

"This is worse than what anyone had imagined."

Slang for "Who Could Have Known?" Made mockingly, toward a situation where short term choices present an outcome that is clearly obvious - yet the claimants say the outcome could never be anticipated. There is an implicit assumption that person(s) at fault, refuse to accept responsibility for their choices. The original question (used by them) is an attempt to deflect criticism. This word is popularized on economic blogs and forums.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Leaving Bangladesh? Not a...