Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sun May 12, 2013, 06:27 PM May 2013

Bombing Iran’s Nuclear Facilities would leave the Entire Gulf States Region Virtually Uninhabitable

Every Spring and Summer, during a period of low pressure over the Persian Gulf, powerful winds known as the “shamals and sharqi,” sweep down from the north and north east into Saudi Arabia, whipping up ever more grains of sand as they head south and south west across the Arabian Desert. Frequently, these sandstorms become gargantuan in size – hundreds of meters high and kilometers wide and in length of dense roiling particulate, choking the lungs of those exposed, blocking out the sun completely and, by the time they are over, burying whole towns, sometimes even large cities like Riyadh, in a meter deep or more of sand.

Fukushima is, without question, the world’s worst nuclear disaster to date. In fact, many scientists believe, and with good reason, that the Fukushima incident, which is far from over, is the world’s worst environmental catastrophe.

“While the long-term repercussions of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are yet to be fully assessed, they are far more serious than those pertaining to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine, which resulted in almost one million deaths (New Book Concludes – Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer” Global Research, September 10, 2010. For a full account of Fukushima, see “Global Research Online Interactive Reader Series, Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War, The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation (Michel Chossudovsky, editor).

Now imagine several large nuclear reactors (Iran’s Bushehr reactor output, for example, is 1000 megawatts, compared to Fukushima Daiichi’s largest reactor which had an output of 784 megawatts), along with several uranium enrichment plants, and certainly military storage sites and quite likely even uranium mines, all bombed to dust within a matter of days. Moreover, unlike the Fukushima Daiichi reactors which suffered only partial meltdowns with much of the fuel rods and spent fuel storages remaining mostly intact, “all” of Iran’s nuclear fuel would be exploded into the atmosphere. And let us not forget that the US-Israeli military ordinances employed to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities would certainly be tipped with depleted uranium, and very likely would include some mini-nukes.

Indeed, in regards nuclear disasters and environmental catastrophes, Fukushima would absolutely pale in comparison to that caused by the bombing of Iran’s nuclear sites. The nuclear fallout from such an event would be extreme, to put it mildly. Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of innocent Iranians would likely die within the first year of such a strike, while millions more would die within a decade or two of some form of radiation-induced cancer. And since a significant portion of that nuclear fallout would end up either immediately, or over the course of the next weeks and months in the Arabian Desert, where the winds, year after year, would gather it up along with the particles of sand and dust into gigantic roiling irradiated storms (remember, “hundreds” of such sand and dust storms annually), not a person living anywhere in the Gulf State region would be safe from exposure. The Persian Gulf, too, would soon be so irradiated and toxic and lifeless that it might as well be renamed the New Dead Sea.

MORE...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/good-bye-dubai-bombing-irans-nuclear-facilities-would-leave-the-entire-gulf-states-region-virtually-uninhabitable/5334737
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bombing Iran’s Nuclear Facilities would leave the Entire Gulf States Region Virtually Uninhabitable (Original Post) Purveyor May 2013 OP
In re: Global Research - Discussion of Iran's nuclear work , multi-lateral negotiations, responses, pinto May 2013 #1
I use no source as a 'primary source'...but thanks anyway. eom Purveyor May 2013 #3
Sounds like a win-win for a lot of right wingers Fumesucker May 2013 #2
They seem to have quieted down about war with Iran ... markpkessinger May 2013 #4

pinto

(106,886 posts)
1. In re: Global Research - Discussion of Iran's nuclear work , multi-lateral negotiations, responses,
Sun May 12, 2013, 06:46 PM
May 2013

etc. are much needed in the current international climate. Yet, I'd caution against using Global Research as a primary source. They are notoriously prone to inflammatory, poorly sourced conspiracy theory sensationalism.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
2. Sounds like a win-win for a lot of right wingers
Sun May 12, 2013, 06:49 PM
May 2013

They've been itching to nuke Mecca since 9/11 at least.

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
4. They seem to have quieted down about war with Iran ...
Sun May 12, 2013, 08:14 PM
May 2013

. . . in favor of banging the drum for war with Syria. They'll take either one -- they're not picky!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bombing Iran’s Nuclear Fa...