Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEnron's Skilling has spent $70 on legal fees.”million
There is Too Big to Jail and now there is Too Big to Keep In Jail.
This is the envelope-pushing precedent being set by the Justice Department in its dealings with convicted Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling a.k.a. one of the hucksters whose rip-off schemes were responsible for, among other things, losing more than $2 billion of retirees pension funds.
In a revised sentencing agreement announced late last week, federal prosecutors cited the extraordinary resources required to litigate Skillings appeals as justification for reducing his sentence by more than 10 years. NBC News reports that in exchange, Skilling would give up all of his remaining rights to appeal and he also would give up any claims to the $40 million he was ordered to forfeit to the Enron victims fund. Reuters notes that such a sum which will be handed over to a depleted victims fund pales in comparison to the $70 million Skilling has spent on legal fees.
In two ways, the circumstances of Skillings settlement show both the old and new double standards that plague Americas criminal justice system.
First and foremost, the case exemplifies the ancient-yet-still-deplorable double standards in how the system tends to treat rich defendants and poor defendants.
To see this particular double standard at work, consider the fact that, as Forbes reports, many of Skillings victims dont support the settlement, even if it means recovering a tiny bit amount of money they lost. Then consider the fact that, as Businessweek notes, Theres a good chance (the judge) will impose the minimum sentence under the deal in spite of victims objections. Why? Because according to Jim DeVita, the white-collar defense lawyer who defended Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski, the judge will see no threat of a repeat crime (emphasis added):
In a case of this nature, even though it involved the significant and monumental collapse of a company, 14 years is probably enough, DeVita said. For someone like Mr. Skilling, the likelihood of recidivism is nil 14 years is more than enough to deter someone from doing that again.
More:
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/our_enron_style_justice_system/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 950 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Enron's Skilling has spent $70 on legal fees.”million (Original Post)
Ichingcarpenter
May 2013
OP
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)1. That's only a tiny fraction of what he and Enron stole from the people.
I'd say release him after he forfeits every penny of his assets.
CanonRay
(14,112 posts)2. Steal millions and then buy your way out of jail
An American tradition...
Scuba
(53,475 posts)3. No threat of repeat crime by Skilling, no deterrent to the next crook who thinks of such schemes.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)4. I proposed it once, I propose it again:
1 year of mandatory jail-time for each $1,000,000 stolen, on top of all other penalties.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)5. He should have to forfeit all his wealth as restitution. nm
Mr. David
(535 posts)6. California agents should be ready to arrest him and bring him for trial
no bond, all assets forfeited to the state of California, and sentenced to life in prison without any chance of parole.
Yep, that's what he should get for screwing California and attempting (and still is) to get away with it.