Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSoda Industry Cashes In on Govt. Food Assistance Programs to Tune of $4 Bilion a Year
http://www.alternet.org/food/soda-industry-cashes-govt-food-assistance-programs-tune-4-bilion-year***SNIP
A sweet deal for Big Soda
Calls for an end to the soft-drink subsidy are coming from academia as well as from statehouses. A 2011 commentary last year in the Journal of the American Medical Association argued,
The government purchases millions of servings of sugar-sweetened beverages for SNAP participants each day. This practice arguably erodes diet quality and promotes chronic illness among individuals who are at increased risk of obesity-related disease because of limited financial resources.
Around the same time, a white paper from the Arizona State School of Nutrition and Health Promotion included this statement:
Restricting options for purchase of unhealthy foods can be a powerful strategy for improving diets of SNAP recipients. There is strong scientific evidence for a restrictive strategy, and there is precedence from other federal programs such as WIC [the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children and NSLP [the National School Lunch Program], which limit benefits to the purchase of foods that are considered healthy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 611 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Soda Industry Cashes In on Govt. Food Assistance Programs to Tune of $4 Bilion a Year (Original Post)
xchrom
May 2013
OP
cali
(114,904 posts)1. I have a certain reluctance to endorsing plans which tell
food stamp recipients what to eat and not eat- for several reasons.
One is that food stamp allowances hardly subsidize healthy eating. Yes, one can do it. I do, but I don't have children to feed and I'm an excellent cook who knows a lot about nutrition. I eat a lot of brown rice and beans, potatoes and other root vegetables. I don't purchase prepared foods and very few frozen foods. I have the time to shop strategically, but I still can't afford a lot of healthy options.
Another reason is that it's demeaning enough to be on food stamps without being told what you can purchase.
I'd like to see more education and cooking classes made available for food stamp recipients as well as increases in subsidies.
Not that any of that will happen.
diabeticman
(3,121 posts)2. I think that's a little too much government control.