Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Mon May 20, 2013, 11:23 AM May 2013

Supreme Court To Weigh In On Legislative Prayers


WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear a new case on the intersection of religion and government in a dispute over prayers used to open public meetings.

The justices said they will review an appeals court ruling that held that the town of Greece in suburban Rochester in upstate New York violated the Constitution by opening nearly every meeting over an 11-year span with prayers that stressed Christianity.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the town should have made a greater effort to invite people from other faiths to open its monthly board meetings.

The town says the high court already has upheld prayers at the start of legislative meetings and that private citizens offered invocations of their own choosing. The town said in court papers that the opening prayers should be found to be constitutional, "so long as the government does not act with improper motive in selecting prayer-givers." ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/supreme-court-legislative-prayers_n_3306312.html?ncid=txtlnkushpmg00000037



1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court To Weigh In On Legislative Prayers (Original Post) marmar May 2013 OP
There is a concept in Constitutional COLGATE4 May 2013 #1

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
1. There is a concept in Constitutional
Mon May 20, 2013, 11:36 AM
May 2013

Law that probably covers this activity, known as 'ceremonial deism'. Courts have held in the past that such phrases as "God save this honorable court" and similar are not violations of the First Amendment and are really not religious imprecations but rather ceremonial deism, i.e. just words without constitutional import. I would not be at all surprised to see this court go 5-4 to sustain the practice (although I personally disagree with it).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court To Weigh In...